© Satish Acharya

Satish Acharya is a cartoonist in Mumbai

Tell us what you think. Send us your feedback

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 13 
Posted by SangakaraFan on (September 10, 2012, 14:42 GMT)

@LifeOFjoy : You hit the nail at the right spot. Ajmal's just one good series against England does not qualify him for nominations. Please see his performance against Sri Lanka, which Pakistan lost the series in spinner freindly conditions, his performance was mediocore. I agree with Philander's nomination and he should be getting the ICC award.

Posted by Bilal_Choudry on (September 10, 2012, 6:55 GMT)

@LifeOfJoy Ajmal should be the player of the year .. since he was the most consistent across all formats ... as for test performances if u think that he didnt have an impact u need to understand the kind of lifeless surfaces he plays on

Posted by   on (September 9, 2012, 16:10 GMT)

@LifeOFjoy: u r genius, impressed by ur analysis, why don't u join analyst panel on ESPN, or join the 32 members panel for ICC awards, u seems to be 1 of them ;))

Posted by   on (September 9, 2012, 3:39 GMT)

im amazed by some comments from ignorant who even dont care about statsguru option here.Dude Ajmal got better run per wicket everage than philinder and more wickets than anyone and he ws the reason why English men destroyed in UAE and Srilanka Hardly managed to ger1-0 win in 3 test matches.and Bangladehs lost to 2-0.So make sure to use statsguru option its really easy.

Posted by   on (September 8, 2012, 19:29 GMT)

@LifeOFjoy: You said Ajmal was a part of few lost series. For your kind information, in the qualifying period for the award, Pakistan's win-loss ratio was 7-1 with a 'series win-loss ratio' of 3-1, all due to Ajmal's devastating bowling. Against England, Philander took 5 wickets in 2 matches during qualification period, while Ajmal took 24 wickets in 3 matches against England in the same period. Seriously dude, you need to try out Cricinfo's Statsguru!

Posted by Bilal_Choudry on (September 8, 2012, 9:45 GMT)

@LifeOfJoy mate Ajmal was good across all formats ... the next bowler is a good 40 wickets behind in the calendar year under consideration ... as for match winner .. i think if that is the criteria than please check out who took the most MOM awards last year ... u will b surprised :)

Posted by godofall123 on (September 8, 2012, 5:17 GMT)

Should Ajmal be a lock for the award...no. Should he be in the shortlist-probably. Should Pakistan boycott the ICC awards. Most likely.

Posted by Raiyan24r on (September 7, 2012, 15:46 GMT)

awesome.'oversight' lolz

Posted by   on (September 7, 2012, 14:00 GMT)

@ LifeOFjoyDude: Ajmal's average was 14.5 per wicket. And what losses are you talking about? Pak beat England 3-0

Posted by mahicricbug on (September 7, 2012, 13:23 GMT)

Good one. I'm waiting if anybody starts holding BCCI responsible for Ajmal's omission..

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email this page to a friend Email Feedback Feedback Print Print
More in Cartoons

The laundry

The drop

Hand of god

The gift

The toss

Don't resign

The bolt

The zinger

The teesra

No World T20, thanks

The paying guest

Miss you, Biff

No shame

My excuses

Who do you think you are?

Five-fingered

The positives

The Johnson machine

The envelope

The new best friend

The scapegoat

The investment

Please watch

Tiers

We don't want no official rule

No Faulkner

Head-hunter

Humble pie

Not forgotten

Not Santa

Missing you

Boo him

Not a bowler's dismissal

Urinating

Mind games

Rather fortunate

Scaredy cats

The share

The question

Turn off the mikes

  • Crunch time for Sehwag and Gambhir
    Numbers Game: The Indian T20 tournament presents an opportunity to both to show their class once again
  • The rise of the Associates
    Firdose Moonda: Cricket below the international top tier is well structured. It's a pity the Test-playing world doesn't take a leaf out of their book
  • The choking problem
    Martin Crowe: If they are to live up to their potential in next year's World Cup at home, New Zealand need to look within
  • Impressing Viv and Greg
    Five Firsts: Former Pakistan batsman Haroon Rasheed on the compliments he received, and his admiration for Gavaskar
  • Still plenty of ifs for Butt
    Rob Steen: Salman Butt insists players should refrain from "wrongdoing" but that shouldn't gain him back the trust of those he duped
  • ESPN
  • ESPNF1
  • Scrum
  • Soccernet