Satish Acharya is a cartoonist in Mumbai

Tell us what you think. Send us your feedback

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 9 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 18, 2013, 14:18 GMT)

Let the players decide everything in the spirit of the game . No need for the umpires or DRS I suppose

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 18, 2013, 0:05 GMT)

@Kumar Wasnani - Agree that there is no rule that the batsman should walk, but why are the fielders seen as villains when they claim bump catches? Shouldnt the same rule apply for batsmen as well? So when the decision is left to the umpire (although the batsman clearly knows that he nicked it), why do they cry foul when the umpire delivers a wrong decision? Plenty of loop holes in the rules eh?

Posted by Tony on (July 17, 2013, 8:28 GMT)

The walking should be seen in the light of the event that Brads dad banned ramdin for claiming a false catch. Well, if it is left to the umpire to find whether its an edge then well, it is the same for the umpire to find whether its a good catch or not. Dont ask the fielder or let the batsman walk.

Posted by sabir on (July 16, 2013, 11:15 GMT)

Broad should walk in spirit of game.

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 16, 2013, 10:41 GMT)

As if OZs will walk !!! Broad is a tail ender at least. You dont have any right to talk about walking when legend like Ponting or current capt Clarke are not good walkers. there is no need to point out an occasion as there are so many!!!

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 14, 2013, 18:16 GMT)

Oh come on...there is no law stating that a batsman should walk!! The umpires are here to do a job. There are numerous times when batsmen are wrongly given out, does that mean that the batsman should neglect the decision and remain at the crease!!!???

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 13, 2013, 23:44 GMT)

Good one. Michael Holding had a valid point in comparing the Ramdin's incident with that of Broad's. Both of them are guilty of acting against the spirit of the game.

Posted by Dummy4 on (July 13, 2013, 21:55 GMT)

this is supposed to be a gentlemen's game, huh....even the english guys who invented the game could not keep the spirit of the game ....Broad should have walked away coz it ws so evident dat it was a edge...

Posted by Naveed on (July 13, 2013, 10:12 GMT)

It was a shocker of a decision from Dar but Broad should have walked off in the spirit of game that would have been great and could have made the game more exciting....

Email this page to a friend Email Feedback Feedback Print Print
More in Cartoons

Return to cricket?

Logistical issues

The student

Mind the airspace

Change the rules

The best bowler

Hectic travel

Aussie prediction

How to beat England in Test cricket

The veterans

The raining champion

We need dancers

Senior citizen

The drop

The other Ajmal

The silence

The test

Afridi's return

Evacuation notice

The Stuart factor

Progressive England

The comeback bid

Media gag?

The replacement

Gayle retweet

Team united

No mind games

The account

Plenty of positives

Fit-again Clarke?

More time

Four letters

The teacher

Defending champions




The scoreline

Black hair

The record

  • ESPN
  • ESPNF1
  • Scrum
  • Soccernet