The Investec Ashes 2013 June 27, 2013

Players 'too scared' under Arthur - Ponting


Ricky Ponting believes Australia's new coach Darren Lehmann will bring calm to the squad and instil the players with confidence after they appeared "too scared" under Mickey Arthur. Lehmann has now spent three days in charge of the squad after the surprise sacking of Arthur on Monday and he has less than two weeks to prepare the Australians for the first Investec Ashes Test, which begins at Trent Bridge on July 10.

The first opportunity for the batsmen under Lehmann's mentorship will come in Taunton on Thursday, when the Australians bat against Somerset in their ongoing tour match, and men like Phillip Hughes and Shane Watson will be desperate for big runs after struggling on the previous Test tour of India. Writing in the Daily Mail on Thursday, Ponting said it appeared as an outside observer that the pressure on the players had become too great under Arthur.

"The bottom line for me is that maybe the players had been put under too much pressure by the previous regime and that pressure needs to be released now," Ponting wrote. "It's hard to judge from afar but they seem to have been too scared to play the way they can. It's not a question of trying to live up to the great names of Australia's past, it's a question of the current group playing as well as they can."

Ponting played under Arthur for a year before his Test retirement in December and he has now spent seven months away from international cricket, watching as the Australians struggled in India and the Champions Trophy. He said that if a change of coach had to be made then there was no point waiting until after the series, and he believed that Lehmann would bring a sense of fun to the group.

"'Boof' has had a lot of success as a coach and even though I have never played under him I know exactly what he'll be like around the Australia team," Ponting wrote. "He will bring calmness to the group, make sure they try to have fun and enjoy the experience of playing for Australia. Above all, he will instil confidence into the young guys in the team who seem to be lacking it at the moment.

"Will this decision affect the outcome of the Ashes? Well, only time will tell. Australia could have won the first Test under Mickey Arthur and equally they could win it under Darren Lehmann. What I do know is that they need to be aggressive and take England on now. They will under Boof."

Ponting said it was his belief that Arthur's axing was the result mostly of Australia's on-field struggles over the past few months, although the off-field turmoil - the homework saga in India and David Warner's punch at Joe Root in England - had not helped. Ponting said he did not believe there was anything more Arthur could have done to prevent the Warner incident occurring, and he said the players needed to take some responsibility for the on-field failures as well.

"Everybody involved has to take responsibility for this and that includes the players," Ponting said. "There is only so much the coach can do. Once the players step over that line it is down to them and our displays clearly haven't been up to scratch."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Alnot on June 29, 2013, 18:43 GMT

    With the appointment of Darren Lehmann we are likely to witness a much closer Ashes contest. Lehmann was the appointment that the players and management craved and for Michael Clarke the kindred spirit to share his ambitions.

    Darren Lehmann is likely to become one of the best coach/managers any international cricket team has had. His hands on and motivational approach were evident when Yorkshire's overseas player. He is confident, enjoys his cricket and wants to win.

    This appointement is very good for cricket. Let us enjoy a riveting and sporting Ashes summer.

  • Dummy4 on June 28, 2013, 11:58 GMT

    Hughes is fantastic batsman when he is offered long hops wide of the off stump Anything straight with a hint of swing or spin of high quality he is all at sea and struggles embarassingly.

  • Mahbubur on June 28, 2013, 9:35 GMT

    Hope Lehmann will change Aussie's recent records.

  • Hanson on June 28, 2013, 8:03 GMT

    @ Red_Drag0n Hard to argue a case in favour of Khawaja over Hughes.

    Hughes earned his spot by hitting a bunch of hundreds at Shield and County level. He was a clear standout on the lower rung. Kwahaja, not so much.

    Although there's certainly a case for dropping Hughes on the basis of fragile Test performance, what has Khawaja done to demonstrate he's the heir apparent?

    Can anyone explain the hype surrounding Khawaja? It's not like he's Matthew Hayden when he was averaging over 100 for the season. He's not even averaging 50.

  • Dummy4 on June 28, 2013, 6:28 GMT

    The problem is lack of guardians. Like what Steve Waugh did to Ponting. How he took care of him. Talent was never a problem for Australia. It's the attitude and dedication to the game is lacking.

  • David on June 28, 2013, 5:24 GMT

    If one player fails to do his homework that reflects badly on the player. If four do it reflects badly on players and coach - the coach has failed to communicate, or failed establish his authority, certainly something is wrong.

    I suspect Lehmann for Arthur is a good change, but there are big problems in selection too and I'm not sure if those are fixed yet. I think Ponting, with his strong interest in young players, would make a great selector.

  • David on June 28, 2013, 1:26 GMT

    I don't think there is a lack of talent (apart from Phillip Hughes). Main thing needs to be worked out is the right combination of batsmen. Bowling combination doesn't seem to be the problem. Should give more chances to Khawaja. He is any day better batsman than Hughes.

  • Leigh on June 27, 2013, 23:58 GMT

    It's interesting to compare iPL and test cricket. . But not really valid. Test is the key word. .to play test cricket requires mental toughness. ..physical toughness and strong leadership. .. Australia is lacking in all of these areas from the administration to on-field captaincy. Australia will have a lean time of it for a few years yet. This is similar to the pre Alan Border era. We have NO leaders nor any toughness in the team.

  • Chandresh on June 27, 2013, 23:22 GMT

    The best first aid that Lehmann can do, in the short time he has, is to instill into the Aussie team to put national pride over any personal issues. Ego's are big on both sides - it's the nature of modern sports with well paid stars. With England, stars such as KP know exactly where they will stand if a boundary is crossed. To win for your country should be the ultimate goal -I don't know, maybe I'm old fashioned. Having said all that, KP would do ok even if he falls out of favour with the England establishment.....because he has the BIG, FAT IPL!

  • Charles on June 27, 2013, 17:06 GMT

    A number of unperforming Aussie players such as Hughes did not seem at all scared under Mickey as it did not matter how few runs they scored they were always selected because they were mates with the captain.

    The telling thing has been that Clarke has "resigned " as a selector - that tells you everything about the crazy Aussie selections ( Katich / Maxwell / Hughes etc )