ICC World Twenty20 2009

Flintoff ruled out of World Twenty20

Andrew Miller

May 27, 2009

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A
Andrew Flintoff prepares to send one down, Cape Town, April 16, 2009
Andrew Flintoff: ruled out of the World Twenty20 © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

Yorkshire's legspinner Adil Rashid has been called into England's ICC World Twenty20 squad as a replacement for Andrew Flintoff, after the England management conceded that Flintoff would not be fit following his recent bout of knee surgery.

Flintoff, 31, sustained a tear to the meniscus in his right knee while playing for Chennai Super Kings in the recent Indian Premier League. Though he was named in England's squad for the Twenty20 tournament that gets underway against Holland at Lord's on June 5, the likelihood of him recovering in time was always slim.

"Andrew is making excellent progress and there is no swelling or pain now in the knee," said England's chief medical officer, Nick Peirce. "He has been putting in some extremely hard training with Lancashire and should start running and practicing this week. After discussions with his surgeon we have decided that he should continue the remainder of his rehabilitation with physio Dave Roberts, who has overseen his previous rehabilitations."

Having missed all of this season's Tests and ODIs against West Indies, Flintoff will now aim to regain his fitness ahead of the Ashes opener at Cardiff on July 8. The intention is for him to begin his comeback in Lancashire's County Championship fixture against Hampshire at Liverpool on June 17.

The ECB confirmed they had approached the World Twenty20 technical committee for permission to add Rashid to the squad that was originally named on May 1.

"We had to name Andrew in the 15 because we hoped he would be fit," said England's national selector, Geoff Miller. "But in reality the timescale was always optimistic. We have now obtained permission from ICC to name Yorkshire's Adil Rashid as a replacement. There is a lot of cricket still to play this year and it is important Andrew is fully fit for it."

Rashid, who made his first appearance in a senior England squad during the winter tours of India and West Indies, has been drafted in as an extra spinner to support Graeme Swann even though he has been omitted from Yorkshire's first two Twenty20 Cup matches. He was preferred ahead of his seam-bowling team-mate Tim Bresnan, as well as the Nottinghamshire allrounder, Samit Patel, who was controversially overlooked for the original squad because of his failure to meet the team's fitness standards.

"It is an exciting opportunity for Rashid, who was in the original 30 we named in early April," said Miller. "He has impressed the England management after being a part of the Test tour to India and the subsequent Caribbean tour and deserves his chance."

For Rashid, 21, the call-up is another big step in his rapid rise to prominence in English cricket. In addition to his legspin, he is also a genuine batting prospect with two first-class hundreds to his name. Last week, he told Cricinfo that his primary goal this summer had been to get involved in England's Ashes set-up, and that his ultimate ambition is to play Test cricket.

The shortest format can be a cruel game to bowlers, Rashid conceded. "When you're coming on for two overs then coming off again, it is difficult to get the pace and rhythm right," he told Cricinfo. "But Twenty20 does teach you where to bowl, how to bowl and when to bowl, and if a batter gets after you, what to bowl.

"You've got to be looked after," said Rashid. "If you get hit for a six and a four, the captain must accept that a legspinner is also a 'risk' spinner. He goes for runs but he's there to take wickets as well. It shouldn't be a bad thing if he gets hit for a six or a four, he shouldn't be taken off in the next over."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 14 
Posted by SamRoy on (May 28 2009, 16:05 PM GMT)

Well I dont think England has a bad team for limited overs (be it 20-20 or ODIs.) It's the team decisions and their general approach that has left a lot to be desired. For example Matt Prior is no permanent No.3 as he is not the best batsmen in the side but in every limited overs game he either comes to open the batting or at No. 3. I remember Ian Bell opening the innings and wasting ball after ball when they required a high run-rate recently.

Posted by butterhandsfingers on (May 28 2009, 13:10 PM GMT)

Glad they're not forcing him back to play in this. Would certainly be a larf OM3GA if England got taught a lesson by the mighty Netherlands, sooner we can get knocked out of this waste of time the better in my opinion

Posted by Abid_Khan14 on (May 28 2009, 11:12 AM GMT)

Yeah completely agree with OM3GA

Posted by umairhuda on (May 28 2009, 10:26 AM GMT)

He is out because of IPL and cost him... Money Money Money,,, Good and bright future waiting for the players who prefer country first,,not the people looking for money in IPL or ICL...

Posted by pardo on (May 28 2009, 10:07 AM GMT)

OM3GA - "I would be surprised to see them in super 8." Are you saying you expect the Netherlands to beat England, and go through on net run rate? I've heard some gloomy predictions in my time but that is going a bit far!

Posted by jerward1987 on (May 28 2009, 09:05 AM GMT)

wgtnpom is right, what has anyone done wrong in the current test line up to be dropped?? the only person who could be dropped really is bresnan but he bowled brilliantly with anderson in the last test match. England Ashes 11 first test- COOK, STRAUSS, BOPARA, PIETERSEN, COLLINGWOOD, PRIOR, BROAD, SWANN, ANDERSON, ONIONS tricky one putting the 11TH in could be FLINTOFF,BRESNAN,PANESAR(ONLY IN BECAUSE OF CARDIFF WICKET SPINS SIDEWAYS!!), or do you play the extra batsman?? not shah or bell mind.

Posted by ed.dixon on (May 28 2009, 08:55 AM GMT)

There is too much cricket going on here and the players simply can't handle it physically. The national boards either have to cut down on the number of matches or increase the number of players. As is their normal practice, England have rushed Andrew Flintoff back again. He'll play his heart out every time, but what good does it do him in the long run if he keeps getting injured. Personally I think that they should have given him the winter off and had him playing 4 day matches only in the run up to the Ashes as it seems to be their priority. Additionally they should free him from the shackles of batting responsibility and let him bat at 9 or 10. That way you can have six specialist batsmen and four bowlers, with a couple of batsmen who can bowl, and a couple of bowlers who can bat. After all a tail made up of Swann, Flintoff and Broad might not be too bad!

Posted by kirankerai on (May 28 2009, 08:38 AM GMT)

actaully englands t-20 record is better when he is not playing.

Posted by Balmey-Matt on (May 28 2009, 07:18 AM GMT)

Will Freddie play ashes? If he does he'll be running in on one leg!

Posted by amrutjoshi on (May 28 2009, 06:51 AM GMT)

Clearly, the cricketing community is now being pushed into a situation where certain "marquee" events are not going to have "big-name" players because of injuries sustained by them in the course of a packed and strenuous cricketing calendar. Will viewer interest in the World T20 be the same if all the "star" players were missing in action?

Is Rashid the right addition to England's squad?
Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tournament Results
Pakistan v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jun 21, 2009
Pakistan won by 8 wickets (with 8 balls remaining)
Sri Lanka v West Indies at The Oval - Jun 19, 2009
Sri Lanka won by 57 runs
Pakistan v South Africa at Nottingham - Jun 18, 2009
Pakistan won by 7 runs
India v South Africa at Nottingham - Jun 16, 2009
South Africa won by 12 runs
New Zealand v Sri Lanka at Nottingham - Jun 16, 2009
Sri Lanka won by 48 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • Cricinfo Widgets
Sponsored Links

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.

At Cricshop.com