The Surfer

Nothing worse than a poor draw

Patrick Smith takes up the opposite position to his fellow Australian journalist Malcolm Conn in defending England's tactics in the dying stages in Cardiff

Brydon Coverdale
Brydon Coverdale
25-Feb-2013
Patrick Smith takes up the opposite position to his fellow Australian journalist Malcolm Conn in defending England's tactics in the dying stages in Cardiff. Smith argues that it was perfectly understandable for England to want to face the minimum amount of overs required.
That they did it so shamelessly and without a skerrick of panache took it from scheming to the bleeding obvious. Ham-fisted yes, but hardly cheating or in poor spirit. That is what worried the England commentators - not the motive but the method. To be critical of England for not playing in the spirit of the game is to be precious.
...
As time becomes more precious, wickets imperative, it is just as important to hold your nerve as your catches. To look to accuse England of bad sportsmanship when more than enough time existed for Australia to get rid of the rabbit end of the home side's batting line-up is to whinge and sound mean-spirited. And there's nothing worse than a poor drawer.
Full post
Time for England to do some serious thinking

England may have hung on to a draw at Cardiff but they will need to do some serious thinking about their game if they are to challenge Australia in the remaining Tests

Ashwin Achal
25-Feb-2013
Each bowler let England down in his own way. Jimmy Anderson forgot that he is at his best pitching the ball up. Stuart Broad unaccountably spoon-fed Phillip Hughes. Andrew Flintoff briefly rode a wave of popular raucousness, then reverted to unpenetrative type and is now injured once more. Graeme Swann overpitched; Monty Panesar lacked verve - and both spinners bowled too fast. They probably didn't go into this game thinking they would learn anything off Hauritz, but Ashes cricket evidently retains its capacity to surprise.
Kevin Mitchell, in the same paper, doesn't think too much of Andrew Strauss's captaincy, and feels that the draw cannot hide his inadequacies as captain. He compares Strauss and Michael Vaughan, calling the retired batsman the 'near perfect captain of recent times'.
Strauss's field placings, meanwhile, ranged between unimaginative and puzzling and his bowling changes asked few hard questions. He was not helped by some ordinary bowling and idiot batting, but there was none the less a palpable sense of drift. Occasionally Strauss looked to the skies for the promised rain, the equivalent of a beaten boxer going to the ropes with his gloves around his head hoping the referee will rescue him from his torment. Muhammad Ali, as fine a boxer as he was, won many a bout with what might best be described as the power of his intellect, an intangible magic that drained his opponents of rational response. Vaughan did it to Ponting in 2005. If Strauss is to have even a chance of emulating him, he has to find sorcery from somewhere.
Full post
England can do without Flintoff

Michael Atherton, in the Times , feels that Flintoff will not be missed by England too much if the allrounder is declared unfit for the second Test

Ashwin Achal
25-Feb-2013
Michael Atherton, in the Times, feels that Flintoff will not be missed by England too much if the allrounder is declared unfit for the second Test. Atherton thinks that Steve Harmison could be a good replacement, and it isn't blasphemy anymore to argue that England can do without Flintoff.
Like a second-hand car with plenty of miles on the clock, Flintoff's body has become unreliable. You can give it as many MOTs as you like - and an MOT for Flintoff is another bout of rehabilitation with his physiotherapist and great friend, Dave Roberts - but it is a truism that when you set off on a long journey, you are just not quite sure whether you will reach the destination.
Full post
Is Border better than Ponting?

Judhajit
25-Feb-2013
Border averaged 50 in a side which went three years without winning a series – in an era in which every team seemed to have at least one outstanding bowler – was quite special at a time where boundaries were longer, wickets spicier, bats inferior and attacks better credentialled than they are today.
Full post
Cynical Strauss deserves contempt

Andrew Strauss is either a weak leader or he has no idea about the spirit of cricket, writes Malcolm Conn in the Australian

Jamie Alter
Jamie Alter
25-Feb-2013
Andrew Strauss is either a weak leader or he has no idea about the spirit of cricket, writes Malcolm Conn in the Australian. Conn is scathing in his criticism of England's decision to send an acting 12th man and physiotherapist on to the field in the dying minutes of the tensely drawn first Test, terming it "disgraceful".
As captain, Strauss is responsible for the fundamental fabric of the game, which has been tarnished as a result of his appalling cynicism. While players do not make reading the Laws of Cricket a high priority, Strauss should be well aware of the preamble that reinforces the spirit of the game.
In the Sydney Morning Herald Peter Roebuck says Australia looked united and solid, and the captain himself had a splendid match, both with the bat and as the side's driving force. In Roebuck's view Ponting deserves credit for choosing Ben Hilfenhaus and Nathan Hauritz, the two best bowlers in the match. That is not to say he is a master tactician, however.
The two places you never want your opponent to get to are, in your head and under your skin. And England, with their stunning Test match salvage operation, have done both to Ricky Ponting, writes Robert Craddock in his blog on the Courier-Mail website.
Cricket has only itself to blame for the deeply cynical English tactic that so got up Ricky Ponting's nose in the tense final moments of a ripping Test.The rot set in years ago, when the 12th man carrying the traditional tray of fizzy drinks (real glasses, real ice) was replaced by a motorised advertising cart with sundry support staff. Patrick Smithers in the Age is of the opinion that there are too many people on the field, too often.
Full post
From hopeless to expensive

The situation in the West Indies is past ridiculous and beyond mockery

Judhajit
25-Feb-2013
The West Indies Cricket Board, not content with having the worst cricket team in the world, last week sent a second string worst team in the world to play Bangladesh. That’s like deciding to send Salman Rushdie on a goodwill tour of Iran but, at the last minute, replacing him with George Dubya Bush.
Full post
Don't gloat, England

Having saved the first Test, England can now go to Lord's for the second Test in better heart than might have been, although they would be wise not to gloat, writes Mike Selvey in the Guardian .

Nishi Narayanan
25-Feb-2013
Here, on a pitch that emasculated pace bowlers and spinners alike once the ball had lost its hardness, England were given a batting lesson by Australia's four centurions, one absorbed only by Paul Collingwood among the top order. They need to think long and hard about the disciplines required, the selection of shots according to the conditions and the bowling.
Pietersen has run into real trouble in this Test. Ritual defiance will not protect him from the suspicion that his lone wolf tendencies are now hurting the team, writes Paul Hayward in the same paper.
Full post
Mature North ensures Symonds quickly forgotten

Marcus North's resolute and unbeaten century on Ashes debut showed that he is made of the right stuff for a battle of that magnitude, and confidently shut out any notions that Andrew Symonds deserved to be there

Jamie Alter
Jamie Alter
25-Feb-2013
Marcus North's resolute and unbeaten century on Ashes debut showed that he is made of the right stuff for a battle of that magnitude, and confidently shut out any notions that Andrew Symonds deserved to be there. As explosive as Symonds was as a batsman who could bowl useful medium pace and spin when fit, Australia is far better off with North in the team than the troubled Queenslander, writes Malcolm Conn in the Australian.
North's quiet maturity and wealth of first-class experience is a stabilising influence on a young and developing team largely devoid of the stars who carried Australia for a decade or more. The importance of North, the captain of Western Australia, is far more significant than his modest international profile.
And it's difficult to imagine him arguing with Michael Clarke, let along throwing wine in his national vice-captain's face, as Symonds did on last year's tour of the West Indies. Increasingly, Symonds was a distraction who was bad for a young side building its own culture and identity.
In the Sydney Morning Herald Peter Roebuck says all the hype about 2005 has led England astray.
Take their hairy-chested batting on the opening day. Here was an attempt to recapture the epic spirit. To that end, the batsmen played a wider range of shots than the pitch permitted. Sophia Gardens had provided an all-too familiar pitch, slow and low and hardly changing as the days went by. It was a time for application, even attrition. Yet the locals batted in a gung-ho style, with vivid drives, edges onto the stumps and so forth. The focus on Kevin Pietersen's dismissal was overdone. Was his ill-advised sweep the only poor shot of the innings?
Full post

Showing 4521 - 4530 of 9201