Lodha panel confirms nine-year cap for state office bearers
The Lodha Committee has made it clear that office bearers, across the BCCI and state associations, who have completed nine years in the job cumulatively stand disqualified and cannot contest for another term
The Lodha Committee's nine-year cap on office bearers extends in full force to those governing cricket in the states as well • ESPNcricinfo Ltd
What the court order said on the nine-year cap
"We may, in conclusion, deal with two other recommendations which have also come under criticism by the BCCI and the intervening associations. The first of these recommendations proposes a cap on the number of terms for which an officer bearer can serve and the optimum period for which one can be a member of the apex council. The recommendation also provides for cooling off period between two terms…
"These recommendations come in the wake of a finding by the Committee that under the present dispensation office bearers could continue for any number of terms… Given the problems that often arise on account of individuals holding office for any number of consecutive terms, the Committee was, in our opinion, justified in recommending the length of a term in office.
"A three-year term recommended by the Committee is, in our opinion, reasonable. So also, the prescription of cooling off period between two terms cannot be faulted. Similarly, an optimum period of 9 years as a member of the apex council cannot also be termed as unreasonable."
Nagraj Gollapudi is a senior assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo