Batsmen with highest averages at each position in Tests
Analysing the greatest players at each batting position
Anantha Narayanan
25-Feb-2013
|
| Shivnarine Chanderpaul: The best at No.6 © Getty Images |
The batting average of the batsman in the relevant position is used to sequence the tables. Let us now look at the tables. Where there are more than 20 batsmen, the top-20 are shown.
Batting position: Opening (minimum 3000 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Sutcliffe H Eng 1.06 4555 83 9 4522 61.11 99.3% 8.1% ahead
2.Hutton L Eng 1.23 6971 131 12 6721 56.48 96.4%
3.Hobbs J.B Eng 1.20 5410 97 6 5130 56.37 94.8%
4.Simpson R.B Aus 2.64 4869 70 4 3664 55.52 75.3%
5.Sehwag V Ind 1.41 6691 120 5 6312 54.89 94.3%
6.Amiss D.L Eng 1.72 3612 69 8 3276 53.70 90.7%
7.Smith G.C Saf 1.26 6800 136 8 6565 51.29 96.5%
8.Hayden M.L Aus 1.00 8626 184 14 8626 50.74 100.0%
9.Gavaskar S.M Ind 1.26 10122 203 12 9607 50.30 94.9%
10.Langer J.L Aus 1.79 7696 115 9 5112 48.23 66.4%
11.Boycott G Eng 1.03 8114 191 23 8091 48.16 99.7%
12.Gibbs H.H Saf 1.89 6167 116 5 5242 47.23 85.0%
13.Lawry W.M Aus 1.00 5234 123 12 5234 47.15 100.0%
14.Saeed Anwar Pak 1.16 4052 86 2 3957 47.11 97.7%
15.Morris A.R Aus 1.13 3533 76 2 3381 45.69 95.7%
16.Vaughan M.P Eng 2.37 5719 72 4 3093 45.49 54.1%
17.Greenidge C.G Win 1.05 7558 182 16 7488 45.11 99.1%
18.Hunte C.C Win 1.00 3245 78 6 3245 45.07 100.0%
19.Stewart A.J Eng 3.58 8465 77 2 3348 44.64 39.6%
20.Edrich J.H Eng 1.76 5138 82 5 3430 44.55 66.8%
16 further entries.
England dominates with the greats, Sutcliffe, Hobbs and Hutton occupying the top-3 positions. Sehwag is in the top 5. Note also that Hayden, Lawry and Hunte in this list never did anything but open.
Batting position: # 3 (minimum 2000 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Bradman D.G Aus 3.65 6996 56 7 5078 103.63 72.6% 34.1% ahead
2.Barrington K.F Eng 4.04 6806 40 6 2626 77.24 38.6%
3.Hammond W.R Eng 3.66 7249 52 6 3440 74.78 47.5%
4.Headley G.A Win 3.60 2190 32 3 2064 71.17 94.2%
5.Richards I.V.A Win 4.16 8540 59 2 3508 61.54 41.1%
6.Lara B.C Win 3.78 11953 66 4 3749 60.47 31.4%
7.Ponting R.T Aus 3.82 11924 177 19 9417 59.60 79.0%
8.Sangakkara K.C Slk 3.03 7549 127 8 6916 58.12 91.6%
9.Dravid R Ind 3.19 11395 179 18 8970 55.71 78.7%
10.Amla H.M Saf 3.29 3261 62 6 2977 53.16 91.3%
11.Kanhai R.B Win 3.30 6227 90 1 4689 52.69 75.3%
12.Dexter E.R Eng 3.80 4502 57 3 2798 51.81 62.2%
13.Edrich W.J Eng 2.83 2440 41 1 2049 51.22 84.0%
14.Chappell I.M Aus 3.59 5345 91 7 4279 50.94 80.1%
15.Younis Khan Pak 3.62 5260 80 3 3913 50.82 74.4%
16.Kallis J.H Saf 3.81 10843 78 11 3335 49.78 30.8%
17.Gower D.I Eng 3.98 8231 56 3 2619 49.42 31.8%
18.Amarnath M Ind 3.94 4378 66 5 2907 47.66 66.4%
19.Fleming S.P Nzl 3.65 7172 69 6 2977 47.25 41.5%
20.Richardson R.B Win 2.98 5949 107 7 4711 47.11 79.2%
13 further entries.
Bradman on top is a foregone conclusion. He is ahead by over 34%. However look at the 70+ averages of Barrington and Hammond as also Headley. Then there is wide gap before Richards gets in, followed by Lara. The averages in this key position are the highest amongst all batting positions.
Batting position: # 4 (minimum 2000 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.EdeC Weekes Win 4.15 4455 57 4 3372 63.62 75.7% 1.7% ahead
2.Pollock R.G Saf 4.10 2256 37 4 2065 62.58 91.5%
3.Kallis J.H Saf 3.81 10843 130 18 6943 61.99 64.0%
4.Jayawardene M Slk 4.10 9123 133 11 7290 59.75 79.9%
5.Mohammad Yousuf Pak 4.65 7431 60 3 3373 59.18 45.4%
6.Barrington K.F Eng 4.04 6806 44 4 2367 59.17 34.8%
7.Chappell G.S Aus 4.04 7110 86 13 4316 59.12 60.7%
8.May P.B.H Eng 3.65 4537 49 8 2383 58.12 52.5%
9.O'Neill N.C Aus 3.84 2779 41 6 2010 57.43 72.3%
10.Tendulkar S.R Ind 4.28 13447 220 24 11239 57.34 83.6%
11.Javed Miandad Pak 4.22 8832 140 12 6925 54.10 78.4%
12.Compton D.C.S Eng 4.34 5807 86 7 4234 53.59 72.9%
13.Inzamam-ul-Haq Pak 4.65 8830 98 6 4867 52.90 55.1%
14.Lara B.C Win 3.78 11953 148 1 7535 51.26 63.0%
15.Hammond W.R Eng 3.66 7249 66 7 2997 50.80 41.3%
16.Nourse A.D Saf 4.10 2960 53 5 2400 50.00 81.1%
17.Border A.R Aus 4.70 11174 89 13 3792 49.89 33.9%
18.Pietersen K.P Eng 4.30 5074 74 2 3579 49.71 70.5%
19.Crowe M.D Nzl 4.16 5444 106 8 4841 49.40 88.9%
20.Vengsarkar D.B Ind 3.60 6868 64 10 2605 48.24 37.9%
16 further entries.
The greatest W of the three, Everton Weekes is on top here, followed by Greame Pollock, close behind. Then the moderns take over, Kallis, Jayawardene and Md Yousuf. The highest scorer in this position, Tendulkar just manages to make the top-10 with an average of 57.34.
Batting position: # 5 (minimum 2000 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Waugh S.R Aus 5.42 10927 142 22 6754 56.28 61.8% 0.1% ahead
2.Thorpe G.P Eng 4.72 6744 78 18 3373 56.22 50.0%
3.Clarke M.J Aus 5.16 4375 68 7 3416 56.00 78.1%
4.Flower A Zim 5.03 4794 82 13 3788 54.90 79.0%
5.Zaheer Abbas Pak 3.94 5062 42 4 2048 53.89 40.5%
6.Mohammad Yousuf Pak 4.65 7431 77 7 3718 53.11 50.0%
7.Samaraweera T.T Slk 5.40 3938 57 6 2706 53.06 68.7%
8.Border A.R Aus 4.70 11174 69 11 3062 52.79 27.4%
9.Chanderpaul S Win 4.80 8669 100 16 4409 52.49 50.9%
10.Inzamam-ul-Haq Pak 4.65 8830 49 7 2144 51.05 24.3%
11.Gower D.I Eng 3.98 8231 49 6 2131 49.56 25.9%
12.Cowdrey M.C Eng 3.64 7624 54 6 2377 49.52 31.2%
13.Azharuddin M Ind 5.04 6215 94 5 4346 48.83 69.9%
14.Richards I.V.A Win 4.16 8540 63 6 2720 47.72 31.9%
15.Walters K.D Aus 5.16 5357 49 4 2134 47.42 39.8%
16.Lloyd C.H Win 5.32 7515 72 6 3049 46.20 40.6%
17.Prince A.G Saf 4.68 3195 64 10 2396 44.37 75.0%
18.Collingwood P.D Eng 5.17 4058 61 6 2392 43.49 58.9%
19.Hooper C.L Win 4.83 5762 75 6 2911 42.19 50.5%
20.Astle N.J Nzl 4.89 4702 87 3 3181 37.87 67.7%
3 further entries.
Steve Waugh, the fighter extraordinary, tops here with an excellent 60+ average. A decimal point behind him is an equally intrepid English fighter, Graham Thorpe. Michael Clarke and Andy Flower post averages on either side of 55. The stylish Zaheer Abbas chips in next with a 53+ average.
Batting position: # 6 (minimum 1500 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Chanderpaul S Win 4.80 8669 42 8 2235 65.74 25.8% 15.7% ahead
2.Saleem Malik Pak 4.97 5768 36 8 1591 56.82 27.6%
3.Sobers G.St.A Win 5.04 8032 57 8 2614 53.35 32.5%
4.Border A.R Aus 4.70 11174 63 14 2556 52.16 22.9%
5.Waugh S.R Aus 5.42 10927 79 17 3165 51.05 29.0%
6.Laxman V.V.S Ind 4.52 7136 64 11 2647 49.94 37.1%
7.Ponting R.T Aus 3.82 11924 45 5 1989 49.72 16.7%
8.Lloyd C.H Win 5.32 7515 47 4 2114 49.16 28.1%
9.Walters K.D Aus 5.16 5357 45 6 1869 47.92 34.9%
10.Tillakaratne H.P Slk 5.67 4545 74 14 2843 47.38 62.6%
11.de Villiers A.B Saf 4.12 3902 38 4 1584 46.59 40.6%
12.Dilshan T.M Slk 5.46 3691 52 7 2087 46.38 56.5%
13.Coney J.V Nzl 5.65 2668 48 9 1772 45.44 66.4%
14.Asif Iqbal Pak 5.79 3575 45 5 1750 43.75 49.0%
15.Greig A.W Eng 5.85 3599 67 4 2741 43.51 76.2%
16.McMillan C.D Nzl 5.80 3116 51 5 1899 41.28 60.9%
17.Rhodes J.N Saf 5.81 2532 49 5 1813 41.20 71.6%
18.Ganguly S.C Ind 4.96 7212 47 5 1725 41.07 23.9%
19.Ranatunga A Slk 5.52 5105 54 5 1907 38.92 37.4%
20.Logie A.L Win 5.81 2470 52 5 1559 33.17 63.1%
2 further entries.
The unfancied Chanderpaul is on top, that too by a mile, with an average of 65+. Saleem Malik and Sobers are in the next two positions. Steve Waugh and Laxman complete the top-5.
Batting position: # 7 (minimum 1500 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Gilchrist A.C Aus 6.72 5570 100 15 3948 46.45 70.9% 5.5% ahead
2.Cairns C.L Nzl 7.06 3320 40 0 1761 44.03 53.0%
3.Knott A.P.E Eng 6.85 4389 81 11 2870 41.00 65.4%
4.McCullum B.B Nzl 6.52 2862 46 3 1730 40.23 60.4%
5.Imran Khan Pak 7.06 3807 63 10 1845 34.81 48.5%
6.Dujon P.J.L Win 6.61 3322 69 6 2113 33.54 63.6%
7.Flintoff A Eng 6.48 3845 54 3 1645 32.25 42.8%
8.Jacobs R.D Win 7.05 2579 86 19 2087 31.15 80.9%
9.Kapil Dev N Ind 7.23 5248 98 6 2861 31.10 54.5%
10.Healy I.A Aus 7.09 4356 121 11 3041 27.65 69.8%
11.Boucher M.V Saf 7.18 5068 111 9 2746 26.92 54.2%
12.Marsh R.W Aus 6.91 3633 123 9 3009 26.39 82.8%
In addition to scoring quickly Gilchrist posted an outstanding 46+ average in this key position dominated by wicket-keepers and all-rounders. Chris Cairns comes in next, followed by two top-class wk-batsmen, Knott and McCullum. Imran Khan completes the top 5.
Batting position: # 8 (minimum 1000 runs)
No Batsman Cty BPA Total Inns No Runs Avge % of
Runs Total
1.Vettori D.L Nzl 8.22 3962 60 11 2072 42.29 52.3% 17.9% ahead
2.Boucher M.V Saf 7.18 5068 41 9 1148 35.88 22.7%
3.Kapil Dev N Ind 7.23 5248 58 5 1777 33.53 33.9%
4.Pollock S.M Saf 7.70 3781 79 21 1796 30.97 47.5%
5.Kirmani S.M.H Ind 7.73 2759 43 7 1030 28.61 37.3%
6.Hadlee R.J Nzl 7.81 3124 53 8 1235 27.44 39.5%
7.Vaas WPUJC Slk 8.09 3087 98 22 1913 25.17 62.0%
8.Wasim Akram Pak 8.14 2898 63 6 1353 23.74 46.7%
9.Marshall M.D Win 8.03 1810 75 10 1365 21.00 75.4%
10.Kumble A Ind 8.33 2506 80 15 1265 19.46 50.5%
11.Warne S.K Aus 8.29 3154 113 8 2005 19.10 63.6%
The growing stature of Vettori not just as an all-rounder but a batsmen who would not have been out of place at # 6 is confirmed by this placement. He is ahead of Boucher by a huge 18%. Kapil Dev and Pollock come in next, followed by Kirmani.
The batsmen with the highest average for each batting position are given below. This is not a bad side with a batting average of 64.75. Chanderpaul has earned his position here. I know readers are waiting to say "how can you not have xyz", "how stupid are you are to ignore abc", "are you mad" etc. I have merely compiled the top batsmen for each batting position, that is all.
Still, just for the sake of argument, if you add Warne/Marshall/Hadlee/Barnes or Murali/Holding/Lillee/Garner or Akram/Grimmett/Ambrose/McGrath to this collection of 7, this team will take some beating.
1.Sutcliffe H Eng 4522 61.11 2.Hutton L Eng 6721 56.48 (??? Hobbs with 5130 @ 56.37) 3.Bradman D.G Aus 5078 103.63 4.EdeC Weekes Win 3372 63.62 5.Waugh S.R Aus 6754 56.28 6.Chanderpaul S Win 2235 65.74 (??? Sobers with 2614 @ 53.35) 7.Gilchrist A.C Aus 3948 46.45Since I felt that nos 9-10-11 analysis would not lead to anything significant I have not done the analysis for these positions.
There is no equivalent of the ODI Index for Test matches. Balls faced has to be extrapolated and that seems inappropriate for this analysis.
To view/down-load the complete tables, please click/right-click here.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems