The question of the captaincy of the Barbados cricket team
for next year's Busta Cup seems to be a big talking point
but it makes you wonder why there's a debate in the first
place.
The incumbent Sherwin Campbell was only appointed this
season and Barbados won the Cup even though it is a fact
that Ian Bradshaw who deputised while Campbell was on tour
with the West Indies also played his part in the overall
triumph.
Why in heaven's name would there be any suggestion that the
selection panel might recommend his removal?
The only logical reason would be that they feel it would be
better to relieve him of the pressure that goes with being
captain so that he can concentrate primarily on his batting
now with renewed vigour in his quest to regain his place at
the top of the West Indies batting order.
Even so, I believe that if these were Campbell's own
thoughts he would have been keen to give up the captaincy
voluntarily.
That there has been no indication of this from him means
that he is still very interested in doing the job. And if he
is, he should retain the reins.
Leadership is nothing new to Campbell and as a youth player
he was a prolific scorer while at the helm of both the
Barbados and West Indies teams.
Responsibility has helped him rather than burdened him
therefore I see no reason why this outlook should change.
Besides, like everyone else, Campbell would have recognised
that events in Sri Lanka recently may have made it possible
for him or any other aspirant to open the innings sooner
than they had imagined.
A renewed focus could reap great rewards and if Campbell
scores big in the Busta Cup he could be back in business by
the time the Indians reach the Caribbean.
Of course, at this stage, too, it is clear that he needs to
regain lost confidence.
To relieve him of the captaincy now could only dent his self
esteem and embroil him in more self doubt than he currently
needs. The selectors must by all means keep Campbell
captain.