CMJ: Two-day future looms for counties (12 May 1997)
IT is a nice coincidence that on the very morning of the arrival of the 1997 Australians, the England and Wales Cricket Board are considering for county cricket a form of the game which has been the bedrock of Australian success:
12-May-1997
Monday 12 May 1997
Two-day future looms for counties
Christopher Martin-Jenkins
IT is a nice coincidence that on the very morning of the  arrival
of the 1997 Australians, the England  and Wales Cricket Board are
considering for county  cricket a form of  the  game   which  has
been   the   bedrock   of  Australian  success:  two-day cricket,
writes Christopher Martin-Jenkins.
Already there is a growing move at under-17 and  under- 19 levels
towards   two-day   matches   of   the   kind   played   by   all
Australian grade cricketers.
Essentially  they   are   one-innings   matches   which encourage
orthodox  batting,  the  art  of  building  an innings, attacking
bowling and field-settings designed  to take  wickets.  There are
extra    points,    however,    for   the  side   who   can   bat
positively, bowl the other  one  out  twice  and  gain  what  the
Aussies call "an outright".
It is the type of cricket which   has   produced   in   the  best
players  in   Australia  and  South  Africa,  where  such matches
are the staple diet  for   the   best   amateur   leagues,   that
mixture  of  controlled   aggression,   teamwork,   toughness and
technical rectitude which makes for success in Test cricket.
John Carr, the cricket operations manager of  the  ECB, confirmed
this  weekend  that  two-day matches in county cricket are on the
agenda: "We generally feel that this  is   an   idea  well  worth
considering  at first-class level," he said.  Tim Lamb, the ECB`s
chief executive, agrees: "If this form  of cricket  is  going  to
be  encouraged  for our best junior and league  cricket, it seems
logical for the  professionals  to  be  playing  it  too,   as  a
prototype for the rest."
This is not a  definite  proposal  yet,  but,  as  with  regional
cricket  and  a  two-division  championship,  it  is part  of the
debate which is still going on at  Lord`s  and  in  the counties.
Two-day  cricket will be one  of  several possibilities discussed
by the First Class Forum when they meet tomorrow. These are still
sensitive  issues  and Carr, the former  Middlesex batsman now in
his first full season as  the administrator  at the sharp end  of
county    cricket,    is    wary  about   stating   his  personal
preferences.
He experienced grade cricket at first  hand  in  Sydney  and  New
South  Wales,  however,  and  is  far  from  alone   in believing
that it would be the best formula both for the   top  leagues  in
the  38  counties  and  for the proposed competition between  the
minor counties and  second   elevens   of   the   18  first-class
clubs.
That the  format  might  be  extended  to  professional  cricket,
too,  is  a  new  and  interesting  proposal. A certain amount of
first-class two-day matches would meet the one serious  objection
to  the  idea  that  the   best  England-qualified players should
concentrate  in  future  on   a   new   competition  between  six
regional sides distilled from county cricket.
Some county officials are worried  that  this   relatively  elite
group  would spend too little time with  the  clubs  who nurtured
them. If they were to play not just   in   each   county`s  major
one-day  games  but  also  in  two-day  matches,  those anxieties
would  be  eased  and  it  should   be   feasible   to   have   a
championship comprising a mixture of two and four-day games.  The
alternative,   as   already    discussed,    is    a    three-day
competition on uncovered pitches.
Not until the end of the season will  the  counties  be asked  to
vote  for  a revised format, based on a  blueprint  which will be
identified with Lord MacLaurin, chairman  of  the  ECB, but which
will  initially be the product of teamwork by the full management
committee,  working   on   recommendations   by  Lamb,  Carr  and
director  of  coaching  Micky  Stewart.  The  overall plan, to be
finalised by the end of August,  will  include junior,  club  and
minor county cricket as well as the professional level.
I KNOW what my colleague Michael Parkinson  was   saying  in  his
comments  about  the way cricket seasons  begin  in  this country
(Telegraph, May 5). It is true that the season tends to creep  in
almost  unnoticed  by  some,   albeit   not  the  overall cricket
readership of six million.
True, too, that cricket has to  sell  itself  and   compete  with
other  sports both for  its  spectators  and  its  young players.
But I cannot agree that the  season  should  come   in   with   a
blaring  of  trumpets  and  a television advertising campaign, if
only because typical  early-season  weather   would   often  lead
to embarrassing anti-climax.
Marketing is actually one area  where   English   cricket  works.
The game is turning over about 60  million  and  making  a profit
of  some    20   million   from    the    Tests    and    one-day
internationals.
It is true that by introducing the Premier  League  the  football
authorities have generated far greater profits for  the top clubs
but in cricket, even in Australia, the  more  the `big`  occasion
is  sold,  the  harder  it  is   to   get   people   to watch the
essential bread and butter  games.  There  have   to   be  lowerkey, preparatory events too.
In other words,  the  striving  to  be   competitive,   which  is
healthy    and    cannot    be   avoided,   should    not    mean
traditions have to   be   thrown   away.   The   long-established
fixtures  between Oxford or Cambridge and the counties are a case
in point.
If they are anachronisms, they are harmless ones which  sometimes
hasten   the    progress    of    promising undergraduate players
and often that of talented  youngsters  on  county  staffs,  like
Stephen   Peters   of   Essex,   who   will have  lost nothing in
self-esteem by scoring  a  hundred  last week  against Cambridge.
The  Cambridge   side   have  three first-class  centurymakers,
and their second eleven, the Crusaders, are competing   with  the
Oxford  Authentics  and  the  major  provincial teams in a newlyconstituted British university tournament.
There are those who think  that  Oxford  and  Cambridge should be
replaced   for   the  purposes  of  first-class  matches  by  the
representative British University side, but that   would  present
huge logistical  problems  for  students  studying  for exams.
At  least  one  county  coach  is   unhappy   as   it   is   that
university players contracted to counties should be able  to play
against their own teams in the Benson and Hedges.
That competition, by the way, will be  doomed   if   this  week`s
Queen`s   Speech   contains   a  ban  on  all  forms  of  tobacco
advertising. The 50-over format is guaranteed  for   the  future,
but for B and H it looks like a case of thank  you  and farewell.
Source :: The Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/)