The tributes have been flowing thick and fast for Lala
Amarnath. Although reading of any cricketing folklore informs one
about the kind of man Amarnath was, I have not had the pleasure of
watching even video footage of his cricket. From a layman's viewpoint,
the death of Lala Amarnath has been put in perspective by the
responses that have poured in.
As would only be expected, reports in newspapers and websites alike
are littered with a couple of cliches. Lala Amarnath is referred to
almost exclusively as 'the stormy petrel of Indian cricket' or as 'the
original rebel.' I would claim ignorance on either count. I also
hastily add that these cliches might be used solely for the reason
that they are so apt.
However a person's death means so many different things to different
people. The use of a cliche puts all those responses under one
blanket. Cricket, and its following, has always had a healthy amount
of subjectivity involved.
What makes the responses of various cricketers ring less than true is
a report that suggests that only three former Test cricketers attended
Lala Amarnath's funeral. Cricketnext.com reports that R Surendranath,
Yashpal Sharma and Gursharan Singh were the only three Test players in
attendance. Everyone who is involved with Indian cricket knows that a
sizable number of former Test cricketers live in Delhi. What everyone
also knows is the number of former cricketers that turned out for the
release of those controversial tapes by Manoj Prabhakar and
tehelka.com. The number was considerably more than three.
At a time when journalism seems to focus so much on responses of
celebrities to an event, it is sad that even a death has been reduced
to this level. Although a group of former Test cricketers were keen to
express their deepest sadness to televison programmes, websites and
newspapers, only three thought it necessary to attend the funeral of
Lala Amarnath.
What tribute could be more fitting than spending a couple of quiet
moments at the man's funeral with head bowed in respect?