8 December 1997
'Cricketland' enters the realms of fantasy
Christopher Martin-Jenkins
THE plan for a major international tournament next September at
a spectacular new cricket stadium at Disney World in Florida,
confidently announced by the International Cricket Council in
June, has foundered, writes Christopher Martin-Jenkins.
At the meeting of the ICC's management board in Calcutta today
and tomorrow, a decision to scrap the plan or move it to a
different country appears inevitable. The grandiose idea,
intended to raise badly needed funds for the development of the
game in Europe, Asia and North America, has been delayed by a
wasteful political wrangle in the United States and the threat
of legal action against the world's governing body.
An extraordinary saga began with a meeting in October 1995 in
Orlando between David Richards, the ICC's chief executive, and
Mike Millay, the director of Sports Development at Disney World.
The Barbados consul-general in New York was present at the
meeting and so was Richard Craig, a vice-president of the USA
Cricket Association. Ambitious plans were discussed, including
not just international tournaments but such matches as the US v
Canada, the US v Barbados, pre-season training camps for English
counties and use of the proposed new centre as one of the venues
for a future World Cup in the Caribbean region.
Richards was unaware at the time how unrepresentative the USACA
were of the cricket clubs scattered throughout North America.
The game there faded during the Civil War though it has never
died. The US v Canada match, although lapsed between 1912 and
1962, was first played in New York in 1844, pre-dating England v
Australia. There has been a renaissance in the last 10 years,
with festivals, tours and new leagues, but although the USACA
claimed to represent 160 clubs, examination of their accounts
shows the truer figure to be around 50.
In February last year, a group of concerned Americans met at
Haverford College in Philadelphia, a place with historic
cricketing links, and set up the US Cricket Federation (USCF) to
promote the game throughout the States, develop a proper youth
development programme and ensure that national teams were
properly selected and genuinely representative. In a submission
to the ICC in July 1996, the USCF claimed more than 170 paid-up
clubs as members and asked to be the de facto representative
body in the US.
Their case, thoroughly documenting the failure of the USACA, not
least in financial matters, appears unanswerable now, but the
ICC's reaction was to try to get the two bodies together, using
Julian Hunte, the vice-president of the West Indies Cricket
Board, as the main arbitrator. Apparent breakthroughs since have
proved a delusion. The USCF accuse representatives of the rival
body of ignoring properly constituted agreements, the last of
which was agreed in writing at a meeting in New Jersey in June,
brokered by Hunte. In the meantime, the performance of the US
team in the ICC Trophy in Malaysia was an expensive failure.
They finished 12th out of 22 and 12 players recommended for
possible selection by the USCF were rejected "for dubious
reasons" by the USACA, who had obtained a loan from World Tel,
run by the Indian businessman Mark Mascarenhas, the major figure
in the hugely profitable televising of the last World Cup.
IN a second submission to the ICC in May this year, the USCF
accuse the USACA of "deliberately deceiving the ICC and the West
Indies Cricket Board as to their intentions to make any
meaningful agreement with the USCF". They added that their
rivals had gambled heavily on a good showing in Malaysia, and
spent profligately to impress and win supporters while doing
nothing for grass-roots cricket or promotion of the game.
A single US cricket authority became an urgent requirement this
year as the Disney plan began to take shape, with both the ICC
and the USCF blissfully unaware of the legal threat about to hit
them as a result of a commercial agreement relating to cricket
at Orlando between the USACA, Mascarenhas and the American Billy
Packer, principal of a company called Time Out.
The ICC pressed on with the Disney idea through discussions with
Ali Bacher, chairman of the development committee, and Reggie
Williams, vice-president of Walt Disney World Sports. By July,
Bacher was confident that a fabulous new cricket stadium would
be up and running in time for a major tournament involving Test
nations next September. ICC would run the show and the
development fund would take the proceeds but the quid pro quo
for Disney would be enormous publicity and a big audience both
in Orlando and on television.
For once, Bacher's optimism was not justified. Only a month
after the meeting at Lord's last June, Richards received a
letter from the president of the USACA, Akhtar 'Masood' Syed,
politely demanding an explanation for an article in The Daily
Telegraph reporting the ICC-Disney discussions "which has now
appeared through Reuters all over the world". On July 9, a much
sharper letter followed, expressing "deep concern with respect
to the failure to properly observe USACA's legitimate role in
the Disney negotiations" and "further concern, of a very serious
nature, regarding the position these discussions create for us
with regard to contractual obligations we have to our designated
representative, Time Out Inc".
The legal threat followed. "If immediate steps are not taken to
right the matter and properly include the USACA and its
representatives in all negotiations with Disney, Time Out's
feeling will be that it is left with little choice but to
commence legal action against those involved for breach of
and/or interference with its contractual rights."
ON the same day, July 9, a letter was received by Williams at
Disney from Time Out's lawyers, Kornstein, Veisz and Wexler of
New York, mentioning The Daily Telegraph report of June 18 (my
report of the ICC's handshake deal with Disney) and claiming
that the seed of 'cricket's field of dreams' had been sown by
Packer and Mascarenhas at a meeting with Williams in August
1995, before the ICC became involved. The threat of legal action
against the ICC was extended to Disney "if the reported
agreement is concluded on the current basis, i.e. without the
due participation of the USACA and Time Out, its "exclusive
media and marketing representative".
Richards responded quickly. Writing to Syed on July 11, he
pointed out that at the ICC meeting the previous month, he had
explained the plan for a special series of matches at Disney
World in 1998 during a meeting with Syed and two other USACA
officials in the Long Room. He reassured Syed in the letter that
"it is not the intention of ICC to proceed with cricket
development in the USA without an appropriate involvement of the
governing body . . . once the process of establishing a proper
constitution has been finalised and elections held".
Richards stressed that the ICC were not party to the contract
between the USACA and Time Out, that the threat of legal action
was extremely unhelpful and that it should be withdrawn if the
Disney cricket centre was to get off the ground. He added that
the rights to the international matches planned there would be
owned and controlled by ICC Development (International) Ltd, the
company set up to raise funds for the development programme in
which both Richards and Bacher have set such store.
Richards flew to New York that week with a lawyer to meet Hunte
and two other USACA officials, Gladstone Dainty and Rick Craig.
He had a separate meeting with Packer of Time Out, but failed to
persuade Packer to withdraw his legal threat. Mascarenhas was in
India at the time. On July 18, Richards wrote to Williams,
trying to keep the negotiations going but in a memorandum three
days later to the USA Interim Management Committee, the body now
supposed to be properly representative of US cricket, he
admitted: "The Disney negotiations are in suspense. Unless they
can be reactivated soon, the 1998 window will close." He added:
"We all have an obligation to the game of cricket not to miss
this opportunity."
There, apparently, the matter rests. The ICC's director of
administration, Clive Hitchcock, confirmed yesterday that as far
as he was aware, the legal action had not been lifted and no
further progress had been made. He added: "Our prime concern is
to establish once and for all a single body representative of
cricket in the USA so we can move the game forward there."
The Calcutta meeting is likely to advance the idea of a rolling
world championship for Test cricket, with a league table updated
after each series, but nothing will be finally decided on this
until summer's annual conference at Lord's. Greater hope for the
development of the game in new areas had been invested in the
exciting plan for the purpose-built stadium at Disney World but
for the forseeable future, it seems destined to remain only a
Technicolor dream.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)