The real Dad's Army, and inexperienced England
Canada are the oldest team in the World Cup with an average age of over 31. They have the only two 40-plus players of the tournament.
Travis Basevi and George Binoy
06-Mar-2007
 |
|
The World Cup has reached its warm-up stage and while some of the older players are coping with weary shoulders and niggles, the young 'uns are getting acclimatised to the foreign conditions in the Caribbean. This week, we look at the overall age distribution across the World Cup squads and the reservoirs of experience, or the lack of it, they possess.
Australia have been wearing the Dad's Army label for a while now and perhaps rightly so because they have ten players on the wrong side of 30 attempting to defend their World Champion status. South Africa, who have an average age of around 30.07, are worthy contenders as well. You would have noticed that most of the better fielding sides are the ones whose players are getting on in years. Among the major Test playing nations, India and Pakistan are among the youngest squads but are arguably the worst fielders.
The minnows present an interesting contrast. Canada are the oldest team in the competition with an average age of over 31. They have the only two 40-plus players of the tournament in George Codrington and Anderson Cummins, the latter being the West Indies highest wicket-taker in the 1992 World Cup, and being only one of five players from that edition to be selected for the forthcoming tournament. Bermuda have a generation gap of sorts, with ten players in their thirties, and the other five all in their early twenties. At the other end of the spectrum is Netherlands' Alexei Kervezee, the youngest player, at the tender age of 17, whilst Zimbabwe have 13 players below the age of 25 and are overall the youngest squad in the West Indies. As a result of the chaos that has eaten away at Zimbabwe cricket over the last five years, only one player - Stuart Matsikenyeri - survives from the team that played the 2003 edition in South Africa.
Min
Max
0-25
26-29
30+
Canada
31.374
23y 31d
40y 303d
3
5
7
Australia
30.867
24y 12d
37y 25d
4
2
9
South Africa
30.078
23y 17d
33y 344d
1
7
7
Bermuda
29.851
17y 253d
37y 59d
5
0
10
Scotland
29.643
20y 299d
37y 128d
3
5
7
Sri Lanka
29.305
22y 32d
37y 249d
4
5
6
New Zealand
28.742
22y 363d
33y 339d
2
8
5
Netherlands
28.611
17y 176d
39y 40d
6
2
7
Pakistan
27.769
24y 142d
37y 3d
5
7
3
India
27.720
21y 115d
36y 140d
7
4
4
Click here for more teams.
The Asian heavyweights are miles ahead of the rest in terms of collective one-day experience and India and Sri Lanka are a fair distance ahead of Pakistan. Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Inzamam-ul-Haq and Sanath Jayasuriya are the four players in the tournament with more than 300 ODIs worth of experience.
A most eye-catching stat is England's inexperience. Eight of their players have played fewer than 25 one-day internationals and only Paul Collingwood and Andrew Flintoff have played more than 100. West Indies' Kieron Pollard and Kenya's Rajesh Bhudia are the only players with no international experience whatsoever going into the World Cup. While Pollard impressed many in the West Indies with his hard hitting during this season's Carib Beer Series, Bhudia remains an unknown quantity. He's played in just two List A matches and hasn't batted or bowled in either.
Team
Mat
0
1-49
50-99
100-199
200-299
300-399
Min
Max
India
2225
0
4
2
5
2
2
8
381
Sri Lanka
2217
0
5
1
4
4
1
14
379
Pakistan
1654
0
5
4
3
2
1
7
375
South Africa
1591
0
6
3
3
3
0
8
274
Australia
1511
0
5
4
3
3
0
4
269
New Zealand
1348
0
5
5
4
1
0
14
270
West Indies
1190
1
5
5
2
2
0
0
290
Bangladesh
717
0
8
5
2
0
0
4
112
England
622
0
10
3
2
0
0
1
115
Kenya
554
1
10
4
0
0
0
0
91
Click here for more teams.
Experience of playing in the West Indies is a rare commodity among players in this World Cup. This England squad, for example, has played fewer ODIs in West Indies than Canada, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and Bermuda. Scotland have never played ODIs in the Caribbean before but still manage to have one player with West Indies experience in Dougie Brown, who was part of the England team that lost a one-day series 4-1 there in 1997-98.
0
1-5
6-10
11+
Max
West Indies
387
2
3
1
9
82
South Africa
88
2
6
4
3
12
India
78
1
7
6
1
12
Zimbabwe
69
4
4
7
0
9
Australia
61
8
1
3
3
14
Pakistan
60
6
4
4
1
14
Canada
46
2
12
0
1
11
Bermuda
42
2
13
0
0
5
New Zealand
38
8
6
1
0
10
Bangladesh
37
1
14
0
0
5
Click here for more teams.
South Africa, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and India, who went through a makeover that didn't turn out right, have more or less the same squads that contested the 2003 World Cup. Australia, on the other hand, have just six players from the squad that won in 2003. The other nine will be making their World Cup debuts.
Team
1987
1992
1996
1999
2003
None
Mat
India
0
1
2
5
8
6
133
Sri Lanka
0
1
3
5
8
7
126
Australia
0
0
2
3
6
9
106
Kenya
0
0
3
5
7
6
84
South Africa
0
0
2
4
9
6
84
New Zealand
0
0
1
2
9
6
82
Pakistan
0
1
1
4
6
9
70
West Indies
0
1
2
2
6
9
55
Netherlands
0
0
2
0
7
8
49
Canada
0
1
0
0
6
8
35
Click here for more teams.
Travis Basevi is the man who built Statsguru. George Binoy is editorial assistant of Cricinfo