Decade review December 19, 2009

Highlights of the decade - Part 1


The duo who made Australia tearfully phone their mummies © AFP

Welcome to the official Confectionery Stall year-by-year highlights of the Test Match decade, covering the years 2000, 2001 and 2002. These are my personal selections, and should not be used as unarguable evidence of the greatest cricketing moments of the selected years in any legal cases or political dispute.

Apologies, therefore, if there is an English bias – but not only am I English, most of the cricket I have watched this millennium (especially in the first half of the decade) involved England. And England are, have always been, and will always be, the most exciting cricket side in the universe. I am sure all of you, deep down, would much rather watch Alistair Cook than Brian Lara, Ashley Giles ahead of Shane Warne, and Alan Mullally rather than Wasim Akram.

I am equally sure you all have your own favourite moments of the last 10 years. Maybe some of you are hardcore Boeta Dippenaar fans who insist that the unbeaten 177 against Bangladesh in Chittagong was not merely the highlight of 2003, but also the single greatest achievement in the history of all sport. Maybe there was a particular shot, delivery, catch, umpiring signal, appeal, use of the heavy roller, mispronunciation of player’s name by a stadium announcer, or helmet-kissing, that particularly spoke to your cricketing soul. If so, please share it with us.

2000: England beat West Indies by two wickets at Lord’s In a decade that became notable for mammoth run-scoring on featherbed pitches, sending even the most fanatical cricketing insomniac into a catatonic snooze, this three-day thriller had “19th century” written all over it in gold-plated calligraphy.

Twenty-one wickets fell on the second day, with West Indies skittled for 54 in two hours of maniacal mayhem, with Andy Caddick returning the positively Victorian-era analysis of 13-8-16-5. There followed a nail-nibbling third-day finish as England inched to their first major victory of the Hussain-Fletcher era, against the last remnants of the great West Indian fast bowling dynasty.

Honourable mention: England winning in almost pitch-black darkness in Karachi - Hussain and Thorpe wrapping up victory batting with miner’s lamps strapped to their helmets, wearing glow-in-the-dark safety tabards, and using their innate bat-like sonar to locate the ball. Towards the end, as Moin Khan complained that his fielders could no longer see the ball, and he could no longer see his fielders, Steve Bucknor responded with an admonitory, schoolmasterly look that screamed, “Well, you should have thought of that before you started slowing the over-rate down to 4.3 per hour.”

2001: India’s follow-on victory in the Kolkata Test against Australia This was one of my favourite matches of all time, even though I followed it only by periodically checking the scores on the internet, and had never seen VVS Laxman bat or Harbhajan Singh bowl. This had everything a cricket fan could want in a game – great bowling, great batting, great drama, a historic comeback, and an Australian defeat (for the sake of balance in the world game, of course).

Steve Waugh’s Australians had seemed invincible. Annoyingly invincible. The first Test had resulted in the kind of steamrollering now expected as routine. The second Kolkata Test began as if it would consist of little more than the steamroller reversing back over what it had squished in the first Test, to make sure it was fully flat.

When Laxman walked out to bat after India had followed on, his team were in enormous trouble. When SS Das and Sachin Tendulkar were then out in quick succession, trouble ballooned still further. It seemed a question of whether Australia would have the mercy to wait for a priest to arrive before switching off the Indian life-support machine. A day-and-a-half later, one more wicket had fallen, Laxman, aided by Dravid, had dynamited his name into cricketing immortality, and Australia were tearfully asking the umpires if they could phone their mummies to come and pick them up.

This was perhaps – maybe even probably − the greatest innings ever played. Without question, it was the greatest innings ever played by a batsman who walked to the crease boasting a career average of 27 (it is hard to imagine today’s high-mid-20s averagers such as Dinesh Karthik, Salman Butt, or Daniel Flynn, playing such an innings, even on a computer game, or in their wildest dreams).

Harbhajan spun India to an immortal victory, the baggy greens bagged even baggier, the mystique of Waugh’s men was crushed, and Australia have not won another Test series since. The last bit is not factually true, but still. What a game. If this match is not in your list of highlights of the decade, you are clinically dead inside.

Honourable mention: Brian Lara in Sri Lanka. In the 2000s, as in the 1990s, Lara swung between untouchable mastery and perplexing vulnerability, like a champion trapeze artist trying to impress two women sitting on opposite sides of a circus tent, a career pendulum that made him the most fascinating, compelling cricketer of the modern age.

In Sri Lanka late in 2001, against Murali and Vaas at their peak, he swung the right way. As his team sank to a 0-3 whitewash, Lara scored 688 runs at 114.66, in one of the greatest displays of sustained excellence in defeat that cricket has witnessed. The rest of the West Indies between them managed 852 at 15.77. Take out Sarwan, and that average drops to 11.12. Seldom can the margins of defeats have been reduced with such individual, defiant brilliance.

2002 I have already outlined my 2002 highlight in my latest podcast, involving a very silly crowd at Lord’s and the numbers on the jackets of two stewards. It was what cricket is all about.

Clearly, no actual cricket could match the splendour of that sun-smooched afternoon at Headquarters, but the on-field highlight of the year was:

Nathan Astle’s H-bomb of a double-hundred against England in Christchurch. Two hundred and twenty-two off 168 balls sounds spectacular enough. But Astle had pootled to his hundred off a relatively pedestrian 114 balls. Then, with the match all but lost, kaboom. 121 more runs off 54 more balls, including 12 fours and nine sixes. All this from a man who a year previously had scored 141 off 408 in nine hours. Against Zimbabwe. This was an innings that redefined what was possible in a Test match. England’s bowlers wore the expressions of scared teenagers in a low-budget horror film, as the prospect of the most spectacular defeat in Test history loomed.

As a curious footnote, having hit those nine sixes in 54 balls (and 11 in total in the innings), Astle faced another 3107 balls in four more years of Test cricket, of which he sent only four over the ropes, and none of the last 2736 balls spread over his last 26-and-a-half Tests. But, in mitigation, Neil Armstrong did not reach any particularly impressive altitudes post-1969, and no one complains about how his career tailed off. “Oh well done, Neil, you’ve climbed a tree. You’ve lost your edge.”

Honourable mentions to: Shoaib Akhtar’s spell in the Colombo Test when he demolished Ponting, two Waughs, Gilchrist and Warne in 15 balls, all without having to resort to fielders: three bowled, two leg before wicket. Not even Shoaib’s most ardent fans would claim he has consistently made the most of his prodigious natural gifts. But if he’d bowled those 15 balls at Bradman, he would have got him out at least three times. That is not a fact, but it must be close to being a fact.

Michael Vaughan’s batting. For six glorious months he batted as if Hobbs, Hammond and Hutton had been reincarnated in one player. For the rest of his injury-blotched batting career, there were flashes of majesty, interspersed with periods of striking mediocrity, like a Mozart reduced to writing advertising jingles. Melodious advertising jingles, admittedly.

Next time: 2003 up to however far I get up to. I’m nipping off to France with the family for a couple of days, where I would imagine the potentially gripping denouement to the South Africa v England first Test is headline news, and crowds of feverishly excitable cricket fans are gathered in bars, drinking absinthe, smoking Gitanes, and arguing in an agitatedly gesticulative manner about whether or not Paul Harris is an unheralded genius trapped in the bowling action of a village trundler.

Finally, here’s a stat for you: the highest Test innings played by Virender Sehwag in which he has scored at slower than a run every other ball is... wait for it... 13. Only 19 times in his 123 Test innings has Sehwag scored at less than 50 runs per 100 balls – 10 ducks, eight single-figure scores, and that mind-numbingly tedious 13 off 29 against South Africa in his second Test, in 2001-02. I used to be quite satisfied if I reached double figures in the first 10 overs of a village match. I am honoured to be a member of the same species.

(And as a footnote, regarding some feedback comments on when the decade ends, I am aware that, technically, the millennium began in 2001 and the decade ends at the conclusion of 2010, but no one would claim that the year 1990 was in the 1980s. Would they?)

Andy Zaltzman is a stand-up comedian, a regular on the BBC Radio 4, and a writer

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • testli5504537 on February 16, 2010, 13:02 GMT

    "I used to be quite satisfied if I reached double figures in the first 10 overs of a village match. I am honoured to be a member of the same species" :) nice one andy

  • testli5504537 on February 1, 2010, 22:14 GMT

    Andy, how about an etude of The World's Most Injured XI? You'd have a Bond, a Flintoff, for certain. A spinner would be tricky to identify. Jesse Ryder should be a shoo-in. Any supporting statistics on specific players, once selected, missing the entire 5 Test match series would be a special bonus.

  • testli5504537 on December 28, 2009, 14:58 GMT

    Can't argue with your selections for 2000 and 2001. Kolkata is made even better for what followed in Chennai: a two-wicket win for India in the decider.

    I think it must be English bias that prohibited you from mentioning the NatWest final for 2002. Even though we lost, this remains one of the best ODIs I've ever seen.

    Guesses for subsequent years:

    2003: The Oval Test v SA: Thorpe's return, Tres's 219 and Fred's 95. Perhaps you won't mention the Bevan/Bichel World Cup match... 2004: So much to choose from for an England fan, but hard not to settle on Harmison at Sabina Park. 2005: rather obviously, Edgbaston. Though I'd pick day 3 over day 4: the best day's Test cricket in England since 1981. 2006: SA v Aus ODI at Johannesburg, surely. 2007: Gilchrist at the World Cup? 2008: Australia losing at home to SA. Or maybe the Chennai Test 2 weeks after Mumbai (even though we lost). 2009: Anything you like as long as it doesn't involve Flintoff.

  • testli5504537 on December 26, 2009, 7:46 GMT

    Hey Andy, this was a superb read, really funny. Agreed with you on everything you wrote. Would've liked to see the inclusion of Pakistan vs India test match played in National Stadium, Karachi. Where Irfan Pathan took a hatrick of the first three bowls of the first over of the test, a counter attack 100 from Akmal and India ended up losing, some brilliant spells from Asif and Shoaib Akhtar in that match.

  • testli5504537 on December 24, 2009, 4:53 GMT

    My only regret regarding Laxman is that he only added 6 to his overnight score of 275. Had he gone on to a triple, that would have been even better.

  • testli5504537 on December 23, 2009, 14:16 GMT


    Phenomenal stuff man! I am in stiches. So many "Laughed my guts out" stuff - Moin Khan, Neil Armstrong et al..But behind all the loads of comic writing at its zenith, there shines an astute analysis.

    Waiting for more stuff Andy!!!

  • testli5504537 on December 22, 2009, 21:00 GMT

    @Siriam: Except there was no year 0, So the beginning of 2001 actually marked the end of the 2000th year!

  • testli5504537 on December 22, 2009, 18:45 GMT

    Bravo Andy! Bravo! nice piece...

    I remember the Kolkata test very fondly. I listened to every ball on ABC 702am. India were dead and burried but VVS put his hand up and what an innings...that was EPIC...i will never forget that innings.

  • testli5504537 on December 22, 2009, 7:22 GMT

    Cheers Andy,

    Man are u related to a certain 'Bill Bryson' ?! When was the last time we read any humour in sports journalism, it is usually all about acerbic criticism or eulagatory. That spell of fast bowling by Akhtar, pure and raw, on a sub-continental surface, must be treasured bcoz it is a dying art and fast bowlers and their ilk are declared endangered species. But the big defining moment in world cricket, not just Indian cricket, is the test win by India at Kolkata. It had not only put a stop to the rampaging Aussies, but has opened up the No.1 position eer since. While Nathan Astle innings was a burst of inspired savagery, what VVS did was sublime, calculated, spread over two days, in the true spirit and tradiion of batsmanship . I remember , while watching the match,had difficulty going to the loo, had all my meals in front of the TV. Mr. Kailasham got it wrong. It wasnt Dravid, but Laxman battin at No.3. He dint get too many chances after that still scored @51!

  • testli5504537 on December 22, 2009, 6:12 GMT

    The Eden Test...aah, stuff dreams are made of! I WAS THERE AT THE EDEN ON ALL FIVE DAYS...and i never get tired of letting people know!! :D

  • No featured comments at the moment.