Australia v Sri Lanka, CB Series, Perth

Old-school Clarke can be vital in ODIs

Michael Clarke does not hit big sixes, or switch hits, and has a strike-rate well below 100. But in an age of two new balls and lively pitches, his conservative style could be successful in one-day cricket

Sidharth Monga at the WACA

February 11, 2012

Comments: 26 | Text size: A | A

Michael Clarke cuts on his way to a half-century, Australia v Sri Lanka, Commonwealth Bank Series, Perth, February 10, 2012
Michael Clarke's 57 at the WACA came at a strike-rate of 64.77, but helped Australia reach a fighting total © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Michael Clarke
Series/Tournaments: Commonwealth Bank Series
Teams: Australia

Michael Clarke is a bit of an old-world ODI batsman. He doesn't hit the big sixes, he doesn't even think of switch hits, he is not going to score double-centuries, he has converted only six of his 56 scores of 50 or more into centuries; but the beauty of ODI cricket is it has space for him. To be more specific, modern ODI cricket, with new balls at each end, played on bowler-friendly surfaces, has space for him; especially, when he has around him big hitters who can make up for the slow rate in Powerplay or death overs.

The 2000s and Twenty20 nearly took out of the game the middle-order batsman who fought through innings to help his side play out their 50 overs. Such batsmen scored at not more than 70-75 runs per 100 balls, but they controlled the middle part of the innings. They worked the singles and couples, they set the stage for bigger hitters towards the end. When the limits were stretched in the 2000s, though, such batsmen went out of fashion. You either added big hits, or innovation, to your game or dropped out. Mahela Jayawardene, for example, modified his game and became a superb improviser. Younis Khan added the big hits to his manoeuvring of the field. Rahul Dravid went out of the game.

Now, though, a new, exciting legislation has been added to ODI cricket. Each ball gets only 25 overs old in an ODI. It might have an adverse effect on cricket in the subcontinent, reducing the effectiveness of spinners and reverse-swing, but it has made ODI cricket on lively pitches more interesting.

The Perth ODI between Australia and Sri Lanka was an example of that. "Little bit slower than we all expected," Clarke said of the pitch. "Some balls kissed off a lot faster than others. Hard to get your timing, we saw that with both teams." Also the ball kept seaming a touch all through the 99.5 overs, asking questions of batsmen, and the defining innings of the match came at a strike-rate of 64.77, and it included only four boundaries.

Clarke played that innings. He was not fluent. He was not even going to make up for his slow strike-rate in the final overs. He may have to an extent, had he remained till the end, but he would not have converted the strike-rate of 65 into 100, which has nowadays become the accepted norm for ODI batsmen. But Clarke hung in for long enough to get Australia to a total they could fight with.

Clarke also knows that this might not work in more batsmen-friendly conditions. Jonathan Trott in the World Cup is a good example. He played similarly, he was often England's best batsman against spin, but in the absence of big hitters around him, he was criticised for his 75-ball half-centuries. In tough conditions, these innings are inconspicuous but vital, but on flat tracks they become conspicuous.

"When I think of my own performance, I was a bit disappointed with the way I batted," Clarke said. "I felt I could not time the ball. I just tried to hang in there. I have got some really good strikers around me so that might be my role a little bit. If it is difficult to score, I have got to be the one to hang in there a little bit. Just do whatever it takes to help the team. That's what everyone is doing."

Clarke has the temperament and the mindset to do it. He is primarily a Test batsman, and doesn't feel obliged, unlike other limited-over batsmen, to hit out if the runs are not coming at a run a ball. He can be an important batsman in ODIs that feature scores of less than 250. The Adelaide ODI against India might not be a less-than-250 game, and staying inconspicuous - if not noticed for a strike-rate of 125 - in such games is Clarke's big challenge.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Mitcher on (February 14, 2012, 20:42 GMT)

Some Australian fans would rather the team get bowled out for 160 off 25 overs than have a batsman sum up the conditions, play conservatively and get us to 230-250. OR, they are bitter Clarke is fulfilling his potential and are running out of pathetic reasons to attack him.

Posted by RandyOZ on (February 14, 2012, 16:44 GMT)

I was a Clarke hater but I am warming up to him. I'd still like to see him put in more consistent performances. He often gets out to single digits after triple digit scores

Posted by bobagorof on (February 13, 2012, 1:25 GMT)

And yet in the next match, Clarke scored 38 off 43 including 5 fours, a rate of 88, and bettered 3 of the other top 6 batsmen (and 4 of the top 6 from the other side). Clarke went through a period of slow scoring a few years ago, but he's been back to a strike rate of around 80 for the last 2 years, which is pretty good when coupled with an average of over 55. Maybe his 'slow' scoring is actually just knowing how to play to the conditions? Or perhaps Mr. Mongia only watches cricket on flat tracks?

Posted by Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas on (February 12, 2012, 3:59 GMT)

Clarke has it in him to play as per the situation. He indeed is a fine ODI player. Monga, I don't think you got it right this time.

Posted by popcorn on (February 12, 2012, 2:04 GMT)

Mixhael Clarke is the most brilliant batsman in World Cricket today. His batting is attacrive, and adaptable to ALL three formats.Were it not for the unfortunate loss at the T20 World Cup Finals, he may still be playing that format. Credit to him that he has focussed on the traditional way of playing cricket - which this article recognizes, and i hope many more batsman will follow suit. The Bang Bang brand of cricket is an inconsistent lottery. Keep it going,Pup!

Posted by MuhammadIqbal on (February 11, 2012, 18:45 GMT)

Clark and Misbah Ul Haq have same strategy to win the match by using any mean even through slowing the run rate and both are successful now .

Posted by   on (February 11, 2012, 17:08 GMT)

clark is so boring....quit playing cricket n start ur career as commentetor...he does not provide any entertainment to fans....

Posted by Nelly008 on (February 11, 2012, 16:59 GMT)

Sri Lanka would ideally need a captain like Clarke , It seems Angelo Mathews is getting there....

Posted by MENDIS_Forever on (February 11, 2012, 14:56 GMT)

Micheal "pup" clarke is a great player.A rare,humble, Aussie captain.I like him very much.All the best pup. -From a Lankan fan.

Posted by   on (February 11, 2012, 14:39 GMT)

@whitesXI, Anil_Joshi: Whatever said and done, Mathews's effort wasn't enough. While I agree that Clarke didn't deserve the MoM, Christian was the REAL value cricketer IMHO. He scored 33 on a two-paced pitch, took 2 wickets (and numerous edges ran away for 4 unluckily), took the winning catch under pressure and MOST importantly, he saved so many runs fielding at the boundary! He put in 3 incredible slides at the boundary in the 3 penultimate overs saving EXACTLY 5 runs - the margin of victory. I just can't imagine how Mathews can compare to that overall performance though full credit for his stunning fightback!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tournament Results
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 8, 2012
Australia won by 16 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 6, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 8 wickets (with 34 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Brisbane - Mar 4, 2012
Australia won by 15 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Mar 2, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 9 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Feb 28, 2012
India won by 7 wickets (with 80 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days