Tufnell's Turn
Cricket was the winner is the usual platitude trotted out when you have just lost a great game, but I think it might be apt in the case of the NatWest Series final at Lord's last Saturday
Phil Tufnell
17-Jul-2002
Cricket was the winner is the usual platitude trotted out when you have just
lost a great game, but I think it might be apt in the case of the NatWest
Series final at Lord's last Saturday. It's never good to lose matches like
that, but I reckon it has to be said that India won it rather than England
losing and, as a result, it was a fantastic game to watch. So India won,
cricket won, and the England boys will be pig-sick that they didn't win
having put 325 on the board.
It has to be said that England had got into a great position to win, but
then were undone by that partnership between Yuvraj Singh and Mohammad Kaif.
England might be a bit worried that they couldn't defend that huge total but
sometimes it's just the way the game goes. You'd like to think that we could
defend 325 so perhaps there are one or two things to be looked at but in
general I thought England put in a good performance throughout the series.
There have been a lot of good qualities to be seen. England's fielding has
been great, Ronnie Irani has come in and done well, the batting has always
looked as if it was going to get runs, so I think we can take a bit of
comfort from the last couple of weeks. If there is a little cause for
concern it's getting the right balance and formula on the bowling side.
What really impressed me about the Indians in that match was the fact that
they did it without a major contribution from Sachin Tendulkar. It was a lot
of runs to get without a ton from the little genius, but they kept their
belief right down the order. I did like the look of Yuvraj Singh. I was glad
it wasn't my bowling he was smacking around because he looks a real find for
them.
Now attention turns to the Test series where I think it will be the same old
story. I think we can get plenty of runs against India but it's just a
question as to whether we can break down a very strong batting line-up. I
think it should be a good series with the bat prevailing. Four high-scoring
draws could be the order of the day unless there's a little flash of
inspiration from someone to unlock the door.
England have claimed a powerful batting line-up for some time but now it's
performing well on a regular basis. You've got the likes of Mark Butcher and
Graham Thorpe to come back in, so it's shaping up rather promisingly.
Hopefully those who have done well during the NatWest will be able to take
form and confidence with them to the different type of cricket.
I know it's always said that there is little connection between the two
forms of the game, but in some ways I reckon the gap is getting smaller. And
I don't think there'll be much of a gap between the two sides. We should win
at Headingley, they might start favourites at The Oval; Trent Bridge and
Lord's will likely be flat. But it should be a great spectacle to watch with
the batting power around, meaning that the bowlers could take a bit of a
pounding.
I always enjoy watching the Indian batsmen, apart from when I'm bowling at
them, because there's something really appealing about their wristy
strokeplay. England's bowlers will have a real test on their hands to combat
them but, as I say, someone nips in with a five for 30 out of the blue and
suddenly we could be in the guinea seats.