England news May 15, 2014

From club to country for captain Morgan

Eoin Morgan will be in England mode next week with the start of the series against Sri Lanka, but first his focus is on helping Middlesex make a double-quick start to the NatWest T20 Blast
  shares 11

Play 01:29
Captain Morgan looking forward to double-header

The refrain that England's stars have become disconnected from the county game is a familiar one. The start of the season has been a welcome exception and, before England return to the international treadmill, their stars will help to launch the NatWest T20 Blast.

And in the shortest format no current England player rivals Eoin Morgan for star quality. He will lead Middlesex when their T20 season begins against Essex at Lord's on Saturday - and then do the same against Sussex a few hours later. It is the first such double header in county history. "Saturday for us is going to be quite a huge event - not only for ourselves but for English cricket," Morgan said. "I know Middlesex are having a huge push."

The challenge of back-to-back games will be an unusual one, including quickly moving onto the next contest whatever the result of the first. "Going into the second game, we'll already have had a chance to have a bat and a bowl. But does that equalise the fact that we might be a little bit tired? We don't know."

But while Middlesex's T20 campaigns will begin rapidly, the tournament is a slow-burning affair: finals day takes place exactly 100 days after the matches begin. "The idea of the format this year is to get more bums on seats throughout the whole summer, as opposed to it being sporadic," Morgan said.

Other T20 leagues take a very different approach, being completed in a much tighter block and which has left others, including England, playing catch-up. "You could say that the IPL and Big Bash have taken the initiative and sort of raced ahead of most other countries in franchise cricket and they've reaped the rewards for it."

This year, though, the IPL is far from Morgan's mind: it is the first time he has begun the county season in England since 2009. And his county have given him the responsibility of captaining, when England commitments allow, in all limited-overs cricket.

The development feels significant, with uncertainty over the captaincy of the national side in both limited-overs formats - and a shortage of viable successors to Alastair Cook in Tests. Morgan's initial forays into captaincy have been marked by serenity and unusual tactical imagination, perhaps reflecting that he is an essentially self-taught cricketer. Few would argue with Morgan's assessment of his own captaincy: "calm" and capable of "making good decisions under pressure".

With Stuart Broad injured, Morgan will be able to showcase those attributes in the T20 international against Sri Lanka next week having previously led England five times. "The opportunity to captain the side is one that I'm looking forward to."

The expectation is that Morgan could imminently succeed Broad on a permanent basis, whose role is in doubt after disappointing performances in the World T20 tournaments. Morgan says only that "it'll be something that I think of" if offered, while, tellingly, admitting that he "was interested" in the job when Paul Collingwood's reign ended three years ago.

"It's something that I've enjoyed because I've had something to offer," Morgan said, speaking like the unusually self-assured 27-year-old that is. "Guys like Ben Stokes who have come in - I was captain when he debuted and then to watch him come through and play in the Ashes series from afar was awesome to see. You take great pride in awarding someone that - although you only play a minor part you're still involved in it."

For all the bluster about England's "new era", uncertainty provides the backdrop for the international summer ahead. Mushtaq Ahmed and Graham Gooch have already lost their jobs, and the make-up of the new set-up is in flux. "We still haven't got exact clarity on what's going on or who's doing what," Morgan admitted. "The sooner that happens the better, and the calmer and the quicker things can move on."

David Warner is your typical example - he started in T20, got into the one-day side and the broke into the Test team. And the shots he was playing in the Test matches were unbelievable

In limited-overs cricket, Morgan's blend of calculation and panache make him immune from selectorial uncertainty. But in Tests the picture is rather more complicated. It is clear England have him in mind - Morgan would not have withdrawn from this year's IPL otherwise - and a century against Lancashire was "timely".

Whether that is enough to merit inclusion against Sri Lanka at Lord's on June 12 is a thorny question. Based strictly on first-class pedigree - Morgan averages under 35, and his previous first-class hundred came in August 2011 - he should not even be under consideration. Yet the notion of Morgan replicating his limited-overs brilliance in Tests evidently retains an allure for the selectors.

It has been 830 days since Morgan last played Test cricket. His 16 Tests, thus far, did not end happily: he mustered only 82 runs in six innings against Pakistan in the UAE before beginning ignominiously dumped. "It's professional sport - you're out of form or you're not performing you get dropped." With a middling career average of 30, Morgan did not have enough credit to fall back onto with the selectors: "I don't think it was harsh, looking back on it."

"If I played the series again I might have played a little bit differently. I could have been a lot smarter about how I played," he said. "Since I've played my last Test I'm a better cricketer for the fact that I've played more games and I've made more mistakes." He evidently believes that class transfers between formats, suggesting that Ian Bell could replicate Mahela Jayawardene's success in the shortest format if he returns to England's T20 side.

But it is an Australian that Morgan cites to show that cricketers can thrive in Test matches despite games that seem more suited to the short formats. "David Warner is your typical example - he started in T20, got into the one-day side and then broke into the Test team. And the shots he was playing in the Test matches were unbelievable."

If Morgan is able to imitate Warner's success dovetailing the demands of the three formats of the game, it will leave Ireland lamenting once more that they could have retained his talents. In theory, the ICC's new Test Challenge should help prevent a future Morgan from making the same decision. The reality, with a lack of scheduling space for any new Test nation, may be rather different. "Given the aspirations that I had as a kid, I'd probably still make the move."

Eoin Morgan was speaking at the launch of Yorkshire Tea National Cricket Week. On 2-6 June thousands of Chance to Shine schools all over the country will enjoy a week of cricket-themed activities in the classroom and playground. Visit www.chancetoshine.org to find out more.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY RovinAl on | May 18, 2014, 10:21 GMT

    Despite his less than stellar first class average, I think Eoin Morgan has definitely something to offer the England Test team and that his previous experience will stand him in good stead. For those bemoaning a perceived inability to build a long FC inning, it should be remembered that he did score two centuries in his 16 tests.

  • POSTED BY RovinAl on | May 18, 2014, 9:17 GMT

    Despite his less than stellar first class average, I think Eoin Morgan has definitely something to offer the England Test team and that his previous experience will stand him in good stead. For those bemoaning a perceived inability to build a long FC inning, it should be remembered that he did score two centuries in his 16 tests.

  • POSTED BY vmaxjude on | May 16, 2014, 13:18 GMT

    Much as I like most of Broad's attributes, he can be quick-tempered, petulant, and prone to over-exhuberant appealing and making poorly judged referrals. Albeit all this is usually on the pitch. Morgan's general demeanour is far better suited to English captaincy.

  • POSTED BY SamWintson92 on | May 16, 2014, 11:27 GMT

    I feel Morgan should be the permanent T20I & ODI captain of England & the test captain should be Ian Bell.

  • POSTED BY anver777 on | May 16, 2014, 9:50 GMT

    Morgan is the best choice for Eng T20's captaincy !!!!! Injury prone Broad comes & goes, so the best thing is to make Morgan a permanent captain & give him the much needed BOOST for betterment of EngT20 !!!!

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | May 16, 2014, 8:57 GMT

    I wouldn't have him anywhere near the test side. I'd put the likes of Taylor, Ballance, Vince, Root all ahead of him.

    I agree with @landl47 that Morgan should take over from Broad. I'd have him captaining all white-ball matches because: 1.He is an automatic selection 2.A good leader and well respected 3.Has some experience and should get some more this summer 4. Not playing test matches will allow him to focus on the white-ball formats and would mean there is no schedule burden therefore he would not need to be rested from ODI or T20I matches like Cook

  • POSTED BY jmcilhinney on | May 16, 2014, 8:55 GMT

    I'm not as critical of Broad as a captain as some but I think that idea that batsmen generally make better captains than bowlers because of the fact that they don't have the extra responsibility while in the field holds more true for limited-overs formats than long-form. I think that Broad will be a better bowler if he's not the captain and I certainly don't think that Morgan would be a worse captain. They'll be loathe to apparently demote Broad but now would be the time to do it if they are considering a change, with a new coach coming on and lots of other changes occurring.

  • POSTED BY jackiethepen on | May 16, 2014, 8:47 GMT

    David Warner is not a typical example. Few have done it. Morgan has to show he can build an innings and succeed over five days. He could practice that in County cricket.

  • POSTED BY NWorsn on | May 16, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    Difference is, Warner averages 50 at FC level, not 35..

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | May 16, 2014, 6:09 GMT

    Agree with landl47. There is little evidence that Eoin Morgan can cut it in the longer format, even at county level. Stuart Broad does not convince as a captain and Alistair Cook has yet to convince as a captain at any level, let alone to be good enough to justify the a place in the ODI side on the strength of his batting.

    Morgan may well be the best solution as T20 and ODI captain - it's a pity that Graeme Swann did not get more opportunities because I think that he would have shown himself to be a fine leader *in the short formats*. Hopefully the captaincy will help him to play with the freedom that he showed when he first came into the side and which he has tended to lose at times.

  • POSTED BY RovinAl on | May 18, 2014, 10:21 GMT

    Despite his less than stellar first class average, I think Eoin Morgan has definitely something to offer the England Test team and that his previous experience will stand him in good stead. For those bemoaning a perceived inability to build a long FC inning, it should be remembered that he did score two centuries in his 16 tests.

  • POSTED BY RovinAl on | May 18, 2014, 9:17 GMT

    Despite his less than stellar first class average, I think Eoin Morgan has definitely something to offer the England Test team and that his previous experience will stand him in good stead. For those bemoaning a perceived inability to build a long FC inning, it should be remembered that he did score two centuries in his 16 tests.

  • POSTED BY vmaxjude on | May 16, 2014, 13:18 GMT

    Much as I like most of Broad's attributes, he can be quick-tempered, petulant, and prone to over-exhuberant appealing and making poorly judged referrals. Albeit all this is usually on the pitch. Morgan's general demeanour is far better suited to English captaincy.

  • POSTED BY SamWintson92 on | May 16, 2014, 11:27 GMT

    I feel Morgan should be the permanent T20I & ODI captain of England & the test captain should be Ian Bell.

  • POSTED BY anver777 on | May 16, 2014, 9:50 GMT

    Morgan is the best choice for Eng T20's captaincy !!!!! Injury prone Broad comes & goes, so the best thing is to make Morgan a permanent captain & give him the much needed BOOST for betterment of EngT20 !!!!

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | May 16, 2014, 8:57 GMT

    I wouldn't have him anywhere near the test side. I'd put the likes of Taylor, Ballance, Vince, Root all ahead of him.

    I agree with @landl47 that Morgan should take over from Broad. I'd have him captaining all white-ball matches because: 1.He is an automatic selection 2.A good leader and well respected 3.Has some experience and should get some more this summer 4. Not playing test matches will allow him to focus on the white-ball formats and would mean there is no schedule burden therefore he would not need to be rested from ODI or T20I matches like Cook

  • POSTED BY jmcilhinney on | May 16, 2014, 8:55 GMT

    I'm not as critical of Broad as a captain as some but I think that idea that batsmen generally make better captains than bowlers because of the fact that they don't have the extra responsibility while in the field holds more true for limited-overs formats than long-form. I think that Broad will be a better bowler if he's not the captain and I certainly don't think that Morgan would be a worse captain. They'll be loathe to apparently demote Broad but now would be the time to do it if they are considering a change, with a new coach coming on and lots of other changes occurring.

  • POSTED BY jackiethepen on | May 16, 2014, 8:47 GMT

    David Warner is not a typical example. Few have done it. Morgan has to show he can build an innings and succeed over five days. He could practice that in County cricket.

  • POSTED BY NWorsn on | May 16, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    Difference is, Warner averages 50 at FC level, not 35..

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | May 16, 2014, 6:09 GMT

    Agree with landl47. There is little evidence that Eoin Morgan can cut it in the longer format, even at county level. Stuart Broad does not convince as a captain and Alistair Cook has yet to convince as a captain at any level, let alone to be good enough to justify the a place in the ODI side on the strength of his batting.

    Morgan may well be the best solution as T20 and ODI captain - it's a pity that Graeme Swann did not get more opportunities because I think that he would have shown himself to be a fine leader *in the short formats*. Hopefully the captaincy will help him to play with the freedom that he showed when he first came into the side and which he has tended to lose at times.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | May 15, 2014, 23:18 GMT

    I hope Morgan does take over from Broad as captain in T20 and maybe ultimately from Cook in ODIs. Broad has looked completely out of his depth as a captain and it has affected his own play. Cook is basically not a short-format player and he'd be better off focusing on tests.

    Whether Morgan can make the grade as a test cricketer is more doubtful. He hasn't shown the ability to build big innings at FC, let alone test, level and it's that ability to bat on for big scores which separates the test players from the rest. Robson, Root, Ballance, Taylor and Vince all look more likely candidates- and all of them are between 2-4 years younger than Morgan.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | May 15, 2014, 23:18 GMT

    I hope Morgan does take over from Broad as captain in T20 and maybe ultimately from Cook in ODIs. Broad has looked completely out of his depth as a captain and it has affected his own play. Cook is basically not a short-format player and he'd be better off focusing on tests.

    Whether Morgan can make the grade as a test cricketer is more doubtful. He hasn't shown the ability to build big innings at FC, let alone test, level and it's that ability to bat on for big scores which separates the test players from the rest. Robson, Root, Ballance, Taylor and Vince all look more likely candidates- and all of them are between 2-4 years younger than Morgan.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | May 16, 2014, 6:09 GMT

    Agree with landl47. There is little evidence that Eoin Morgan can cut it in the longer format, even at county level. Stuart Broad does not convince as a captain and Alistair Cook has yet to convince as a captain at any level, let alone to be good enough to justify the a place in the ODI side on the strength of his batting.

    Morgan may well be the best solution as T20 and ODI captain - it's a pity that Graeme Swann did not get more opportunities because I think that he would have shown himself to be a fine leader *in the short formats*. Hopefully the captaincy will help him to play with the freedom that he showed when he first came into the side and which he has tended to lose at times.

  • POSTED BY NWorsn on | May 16, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    Difference is, Warner averages 50 at FC level, not 35..

  • POSTED BY jackiethepen on | May 16, 2014, 8:47 GMT

    David Warner is not a typical example. Few have done it. Morgan has to show he can build an innings and succeed over five days. He could practice that in County cricket.

  • POSTED BY jmcilhinney on | May 16, 2014, 8:55 GMT

    I'm not as critical of Broad as a captain as some but I think that idea that batsmen generally make better captains than bowlers because of the fact that they don't have the extra responsibility while in the field holds more true for limited-overs formats than long-form. I think that Broad will be a better bowler if he's not the captain and I certainly don't think that Morgan would be a worse captain. They'll be loathe to apparently demote Broad but now would be the time to do it if they are considering a change, with a new coach coming on and lots of other changes occurring.

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | May 16, 2014, 8:57 GMT

    I wouldn't have him anywhere near the test side. I'd put the likes of Taylor, Ballance, Vince, Root all ahead of him.

    I agree with @landl47 that Morgan should take over from Broad. I'd have him captaining all white-ball matches because: 1.He is an automatic selection 2.A good leader and well respected 3.Has some experience and should get some more this summer 4. Not playing test matches will allow him to focus on the white-ball formats and would mean there is no schedule burden therefore he would not need to be rested from ODI or T20I matches like Cook

  • POSTED BY anver777 on | May 16, 2014, 9:50 GMT

    Morgan is the best choice for Eng T20's captaincy !!!!! Injury prone Broad comes & goes, so the best thing is to make Morgan a permanent captain & give him the much needed BOOST for betterment of EngT20 !!!!

  • POSTED BY SamWintson92 on | May 16, 2014, 11:27 GMT

    I feel Morgan should be the permanent T20I & ODI captain of England & the test captain should be Ian Bell.

  • POSTED BY vmaxjude on | May 16, 2014, 13:18 GMT

    Much as I like most of Broad's attributes, he can be quick-tempered, petulant, and prone to over-exhuberant appealing and making poorly judged referrals. Albeit all this is usually on the pitch. Morgan's general demeanour is far better suited to English captaincy.

  • POSTED BY RovinAl on | May 18, 2014, 9:17 GMT

    Despite his less than stellar first class average, I think Eoin Morgan has definitely something to offer the England Test team and that his previous experience will stand him in good stead. For those bemoaning a perceived inability to build a long FC inning, it should be remembered that he did score two centuries in his 16 tests.