Aakash Chopra
The Insider The InsiderRSS FeedFeeds
Aakash Chopra looks at various aspects of cricket from a player's perspective

Method to the Twenty20 madness

It's not all wham, bam, thank you ma'am; there's a science to batting successfully in the shortest format

Aakash Chopra

October 22, 2009

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A

Peter McGlashan employs the reverse sweep, Australia v New Zealand, ICC World Twenty20 warm-up match, The Oval, June 2, 2009
Twenty20 has given batsmen the freedom to play some of the most outrageous shots © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: David Hussey
Series/Tournaments: Champions League Twenty20

We've heard it ad nauseam: the Twenty20 format belongs to batsmen. Bowlers are more than bowling machines, serving up balls to be hit to all parts of the ground. If you go by the number of runs being scored in Twenty20, and the economy-rates of bowlers, you'd side with that opinion as well. But let's look at this game from a batsman's perspective as well. This is the first part of a mini-series on batting, bowling and team strategy in the shortest format of cricket. I shall be writing about bowling in the next article.

Does the quality of the bowling deteriorate in Twenty20?
No, it doesn't. But good and great bowlers still go for plenty because getting out, which scares the batsmen in other formats, is considered insignificant in Twenty20. In an ODI the top six or seven batsmen are supposed to bat 50 overs, so we see a conservative approach to batting, even in the Powerplay overs, but there's no such responsibility in Twenty20. In any case one decent partnership is enough to consume the major part of 20 overs, and then the rest of the batsmen can go completely berserk. It's astonishing to see the kind of shots batsmen - and in some cases even bowlers - pull off when they do not have the fear of getting out.

More time than it seems
Let's look at how batsmen prepare for and look at this format. David Hussey, a successful Twenty20 player, says that there's more time in a Twenty20 game than one thinks. When a batsman walks in to bat and knows that his team needs nine an over, the natural tendency is to become adventurous from the first ball. But it's not often that he can hit the first ball for a four or a six. Besides, attempting a big shot before he can see the ball properly would mean a greater risk of getting out and hence putting the team in further trouble. That's where Hussey's advice comes handy.

You should give yourself at least a couple of balls before exploding. You can always take a couple of singles to rotate strike, and get the blood flowing in the veins. This, in turn, might also ease the pressure and help you assess the situation objectively. There are 120 legal deliveries to be bowled in every game, and if you can reduce the number of dot balls, the pressure that comes from thinking you've been holding up the strike and need to hit a big shot is drastically reduced.

Balls at a premium
In Test cricket the batsman gets a few overs to get his eye in, in a 50-overs match he gets a few deliveries, but in Twenty20 it is only the matter of a couple of balls. That's the reason why batsmen in the dugout are always padded up and glued to the game. Information is vital in a Twenty20 game, and hence a batsman, after getting out, informs the remaining players how the track is behaving and what the par score would be. Most batsmen, while waiting for their turn to bat, also make a mental sketch of the areas they would target while facing certain bowlers.

 
 
Twelve runs an over from the last three might sound extremely difficult, but 36 off 18 scoring opportunities doesn't sound that ominous. If you can manage six hits to the fence in those 18 deliveries, you need only singles from the remaining balls
 

Since balls are at a premium, players who can hit boundary shots are valuable. You can only go so far with just rotating strike; ultimately you should be able to clear the fence.

Calculated risk
While it is good to consume a couple of balls before going big, there are certain situations that demand a different strategy. For example, if your team is chasing over 160 runs, it's imperative to go after the bowling in the first six overs. In such cases the strategy of the fielding team is to form a ring and bowl on one side of the wicket, which makes piercing the field along the ground extremely difficult. That's why players like Brendon McCullum, Matthew Hayden and Virender Sehwag, who aren't scared of taking the aerial route, are more successful in the Powerplay overs.

It's not easy to take singles when seven fielders are inside the circle; it's either a boundary or a dot ball. Batsmen who manage to play with the bowler's mind are also more successful than the rest. Gautam Gambhir does that effectively. He walks down the track regularly to get the bowler thinking, and then waits on the back foot for the short ball.

Identifying the weakest and strongest links in the opposition bowling is important. For example, if it can be avoided, you wouldn't want to go after Muralitharan or Daniel Vettori in subcontinental conditions. And in seamer-friendly conditions you'd like to play it a little safe against quick bowlers while targeting spinners.

A stable base, and staying away from the ball
Keeping a stable base is extremely important when hitting a long ball. Kieron Pollard, Andrew Symonds and Rohit Sharma are good examples of keeping a stable base and head while hitting the ball in the air. Most batsmen, including myself, are guilty of losing the shape of the shot when we try to manufacture shots or slog, which eventually end up looking ugly.


Hampshire players John Crawley, Simon Katich, Shaun Udal, Lawrence Prittipaul and Alan Mullally wait in the dugout during the Twenty20 Cup match between Hampshire and Sussex, Southampton, June 13, 2003
Since there isn't much time in Twenty20, batsmen in the dugout are always padded up and glued to the game © Getty Images
Enlarge

Unlike Test cricket, where the batsman is supposed to use his feet to get close to the ball, the batsman is better placed if he stays away from the ball in Twenty20 cricket. Staying away from the ball allows him to free his arms and also get under the ball to get elevation.

Go-to areas
Every batsman must identify his "go-to" areas and shots, at least one each on both sides of the wicket. Once you have mastered these strokes, which could be over covers on the off and over midwicket on the on side, you either wait for the ball that can be hit in those areas or make room or walk inside the line to create that shot. Hussey says that one should back oneself, especially when it comes to hitting balls in his go-to areas. The idea is that if the first ball is bowled in your area you shouldn't be afraid to go for it.

Thinking in balls, not overs
Another thing that batsmen agree on is thinking in terms of the balls remaining, not overs. One must try to break it down even further. For example, 12 runs an over from the last three might sound extremely difficult, but 36 off 18 scoring opportunities doesn't sound that ominous. If you can manage six hits to the fence in those 18 deliveries, you'll only need singles from the remaining balls. Putting it that way makes it sound easier, yet we all know it isn't; but it surely is slightly less difficult than thinking in terms of scoring two runs per ball.

Twenty20 has also taught the batsmen to never give up. Even if the asking rate is 15 runs an over in the last five overs, batsmen have started to believe that it can be achieved.

There can be a number of theories when it comes to batting in Twenty20 format, but it boils down to how an individual reacts to the situation when he walks in to bat.

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Beyond the Blues, an account of the 2007-08 Ranji Trophy season. His website is here

RSS Feeds: Aakash Chopra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by SuryaPrakashDama on (October 24, 2009, 18:15 GMT)

Its indeed a very good article. The view of thinking in balls rather than overs is absolute spot on (especially when you are chasing big scores).The batting team should look at chasing something like 170 as get run a ball with wickets in hand always giving that one odd boundary rather looking at it as 8.5 runs an over and messing it up.

Another view as ShinSplit pointed is batsmen losing fear for fast bowlers. But the other side of it is it demands the bowler to be more accurate in line and length and keep varying the pace and bounce consistently.Hope Akash will touch more on this in his article about bowlers in T20.

All in all its a well articulated and must read article. Keep rocking Aakash..

Posted by the_cooz on (October 22, 2009, 23:16 GMT)

@ Sheky, yes he can play some pretty outlandish shots. He'll often play the sweep against the quicks or even sometimes the reverse sweep, and I've seen him do the Dilscoop on at least one occasion. That being said, he's also got some pretty good orthodox cricket shots, and his Twenty20 strike rate is more than acceptable. If he gets an extended chance in the NZ squad, I reckon he'll do quite well. He's a slick keeper too.

Posted by Wookiee on (October 22, 2009, 20:06 GMT)

Nice article. Peter McGlashan will sometimes come down the wicket to a pace bowler and sweep them. :)

Posted by Mythsmoke on (October 22, 2009, 19:59 GMT)

an insightful article....one thing that author however misses out is the quality of the players involved. the champion's league, and perhaps the IPL (to a much lesser degree) do not boast the best players consistently. Players like David Hussey or heck even Dave Warner they are struggling to get in to their national teams...so they might have valuable perspective, but its only worth something when it comes off against the best...not necessarily when you are playing for a club team against against an equally rated club team

Posted by ajaysinha on (October 22, 2009, 17:40 GMT)

A brilliant article on strategy and technique, coming from someone who can boast of having quiet a sound technique himself! What better than that?! Your articles Aakash, are something my son & I watch out for.. Quite an insight for aspiring cricketers & cricket buffs alike. My son has even asked u questions on your website. Thanks for being his guide. Do u also have a coaching academy?

Posted by ShinSplint on (October 22, 2009, 12:51 GMT)

It is an excellent article. Undoubtedly Akash is turning out to be an excellent writer. I like all formats of the game but I feel really sorry for a couple of things while watching 20/20.

There is hardly any fear factor in 20/20. There is no story buildup. We all know that from the word go the batsmen will start hitting. Mistimed shots, snicks, Chinese-cuts going to boundary will be appreciated. But even worse is to see the plight of the bowlers. No one fears them. I wonder how Lillee, Hadlee, Holding or even Waqar, Wasim would have felt seeing their toe-crushing inswinging yorkers getting less appreciated than the resultant legbye going to the boundary. No scene of 3 slips and 2 gullies, no scene of of silly point and other close in fielders. Thank god we still have bowlers like Dirk Nennes. I can vouch good fast bowlers are going to be extinct soon due to 20/20.

Posted by insightfulcricketer on (October 22, 2009, 12:31 GMT)

Like most things in life which are going fast-food . 20/20 is akin to a burger put together with a powerplay on top (oops relish) .While 5 day matches is like a slow roast in a barbeque pit. We all know which one we will savor the most and keep talking about for months on end and who remembers his last burger? Long may the two formats live but not at the cost of the other. A joy of beholding a perfect cover drive or a searing yorker on a sunny balmy day(night) is the same irrespective of the format .correct guys! May our favorite game thrive forever.

Posted by drinks.break on (October 22, 2009, 11:13 GMT)

@markmansour04, you obviously didn't watch Warner's innings against Somerset the other night. Aakash talks about how difficult it is to pierce the infield along the ground in the powerplay overs, but Warner threaded the needle with unbelievable precision time and again. He scored 40 from just 16 balls at an incredible strike rate of 250, setting up NSW's easy victory with not a single slog or agricultural stroke in the innings - it was nothing but the purest cricket. Yes, the game didn't have the sense of uncertainty and intrigue that can build up over 5 days of a test, but it was an enormously satisfying sporting cameo. We don't always want to watch a full-length feature; a short film well done can be just as stimulating. Warner's innings was a short film masterpiece.

Posted by virology on (October 22, 2009, 9:29 GMT)

Another Very good article Aakash. I believe you are a very good reporter. People from all the country will love to read all your articles. They are not biased (to name a few Ian Chappel) and based only on cricket. Zulash dude, why so much venom against Indians?

Posted by zulash on (October 22, 2009, 7:50 GMT)

An excellent view point considering all the recent bashing that been done towards T20 as a game and (at times the pitches on which it is played - ref: Gambhir's whining). It is good to read something of this kind from some one like Aakash, an Indian who has played cricket. Hope the rest of the current Indian fraternity gets to read it too!!!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Aakash ChopraClose
Aakash Chopra Aakash Chopra is the 245th Indian to represent India in Test cricket. A batsman in the traditional mould, he played 10 Tests for India in 2003-04, and has played over 120 first-class matches. He currently plays for Delhi in the Ranji Trophy; his book Beyond the Blues was an account of the 2007-08 season. Chopra made a formidable opening combination with Virender Sehwag, which was believed to be one of the reasons for India's success in Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04. He is considered one of the best close-in fielders India has produced after Eknath Solkar.

    'We did not drop a single catch in 1971'

Couch Talk: Former India captain Ajit Wadekar recalls the dream tours of West Indies and England, and coaching India

Sachin to bat for life, Lara for the joy of batting

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss the impact of Lara's batting

    Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Ricky Ponting: Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane

    Why punish the WI players when the administration is to blame?

Michael Holding: As ever, the WICB has refused to recognise its own incompetence

What cricket can take from darts

Jon Hotten: It's simple, it's TV-friendly and it has a promoter who can tailor the product for its audience

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

India's attack: rare intensity before regular inanity

For the first hour on day three, despite the heat and the largely unhelpful pitch, India's fast bowlers showed a level of intensity and penetration rarely seen from them; in the second hour, things mostly reverted to type

News | Features Last 7 days