| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
After Jayasuriya and Atapattu they've struggled for a solid opening combination, and have among the worst first-wicket stats in the last six years
June 1, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: The best batsman in Twenty20 cricket
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of Sri Lanka
Teams:
Sri Lanka
|
|||
When Sri Lanka begin their Test series against Pakistan on June 22, one of the aspects that they'll want to set right is their opening combination. During the days of Sanath Jayasuriya and Marvan Atapattu, there wasn't much to worry about - especially in home Tests - but since their departure things have changed, as Sri Lanka have tried several options without finding a stable replacement. Their star-studded middle order of Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardene and Thilan Samaraweera has compensated with some outstanding performances - all three average more than 55 over the last six years. Thanks largely to their contribution, Sri Lanka's overall partnership average for all wickets is the third-best during this period, but that shouldn't hide the fact that their opening act has been one of the worst in world cricket in this time.
In the last six years (since the beginning of May 2006), Sri Lanka's opening pairs - there have been 15 during this period - have averaged a mere 29.83 per completed partnership, with only four century stands in 93 innings. That's a far cry from their record between 2000 and 2004: in those five years, their average opening stand was 43.01, which was the fourth-best average among all teams, next only to South Africa, Australia and England. That was a period dominated by the Jayasuriya-Atapattu pair - they opened in 75 out of 91 innings, and averaged more than 44 per stand. Sri Lanka had nine century stands for the first wicket in those five years, all of them courtesy that pair, which means the two batsmen averaged 8.33 innings per century partnership during that period, and the team had a century stand every 10.11 innings. Also, Sri Lanka's opening pair lasted, on average, 73 deliveries (12.1 overs) during that period.
In the last six years those numbers have dropped drastically. For almost the same number of innings, almost twice as many combinations have been tried, which indicates how unsettled it has been at the top. Those 15 combinations have produced, on average, an opening partnership of 29.83, lasted about 8.5 overs per partnership, and produced a century stand once every 23 innings. Whichever way you look at it, the fall in standards has been quite dramatic.
| Period | Pairs | Innings | Runs | Average | 100/ 50 stands | Balls per dism. | Inngs/100 |
| Jan 2000-Dec 2004 | 8 | 91 | 3699 | 43.01 | 9/ 15 | 73.15 | 10.11 |
| Jan 2005-Apr 2006 | 7 | 23 | 657 | 31.28 | 1/ 4 | 54.57 | 23.00 |
| May 2006 onwards | 15 | 93 | 2715 | 29.83 | 4/ 17 | 51.56 | 23.25 |
Perhaps the biggest concern will be the falling numbers in home conditions. Opening the batting overseas - especially outside the subcontinent - has always been a tough task for subcontinent teams, but the story has generally been different at home. Between 2000 and 2004, Sri Lanka's opening combinations averaged almost 48 in Sri Lanka, with five century stands in 52 innings. The Jayasuriya-Atapattu combination averaged 48.40 in 45 innings.
In the last six years, though, Sri Lanka's home numbers have fallen away considerably, to 31.46, with only two century stands in 45 innings. The comparative averages in overseas and neutral venues are 28.37 in the last six years, and 36.81 between 2000 and 2004. Clearly the greater fall has been in home conditions, which the Sri Lankans will want rectify in the three Tests against Pakistan. In the last two home series, for example, the highest opening stand in eight innings was 81. In the last 35 opening partnerships at home, spreading across seven series, there has been only one century stand, and even that barely made it past 100 - 102, against West Indies in 2010. As you'd expect, in most overseas countries the opening partnerships haven't yielded much except in the West Indies and in India, though Dilshan and Tharanga Paranavitana had a couple of memorable partnerships on the last tour to England in 2011.
| Host country | 2000-04: Inngs | Ave stand | 100/ 50 stands | May 2006 onwards: Inngs | Ave stand | 100/ 50 stands |
| Sri Lanka | 52 | 47.69 | 5/ 12 | 45 | 31.46 | 2/ 10 |
| England | 7 | 42.67 | 0/ 1 | 12 | 32.08 | 1/ 1 |
| West Indies | 4 | 69.33 | 1/ 0 | 4 | 59.25 | 1/ 1 |
| India | - | - | - | 5 | 41.80 | 0/ 2 |
| South Africa | 10 | 13.30 | 0/ 0 | 6 | 23.83 | 0/ 1 |
| Australia | 4 | 16.50 | 0/ 0 | 4 | 29.00 | 0/ 1 |
| Bangladesh | - | - | - | 4 | 24.00 | 0/ 1 |
| UAE | - | - | - | 6 | 13.67 | 0/ 0 |
| New Zealand | - | - | - | 4 | 18.25 | 0/ 0 |
| Pakistan | 12 | 26.50 | 1/ 2 | 3 | 7.00 | 0/ 0 |
| Zimbabwe | 2 | 190.50 | 2/ 0 | - | - | - |
Sri Lanka's overall poor numbers for the first wicket during the last six years mean they're second from bottom in the table of average opening stands during this period - only New Zealand have done worse, with an average of 24.97. Sri Lanka's average is about 20 short of India's, who're on top of the table with an average of 49.80. (India's numbers are a fine example of how they've exploited home conditions - they average 62 at home, and 43 abroad. The surprise packet in terms of away opening stands is Bangladesh - they've had some superb partnerships for the first wicket in England and New Zealand, and average 47.76 overseas, but only 18.64 at home.)
Not surprisingly, Sri Lanka's balls-per-completed-partnership is among the poorest too, at 51.56 - only 0.01 better than New Zealand's.
| Team | Pairs | Innings | Runs | Average | 100/ 50 stands | Balls per dism. | Inngs/100 |
| India | 13 | 125 | 5977 | 49.80 | 19/ 24 | 70.96 | 6.58 |
| Australia | 11 | 114 | 5384 | 48.50 | 12/ 30 | 81.68 | 9.50 |
| England | 5 | 135 | 5797 | 43.58 | 15/ 25 | 83.20 | 9.00 |
| South Africa | 13 | 100 | 4222 | 43.52 | 8/ 25 | 76.34 | 12.50 |
| Zimbabwe | 2 | 8 | 304 | 38.00 | 1/ 2 | 76.13 | 8.00 |
| Pakistan | 15 | 91 | 3092 | 35.13 | 7/ 14 | 72.63 | 13.00 |
| Bangladesh | 5 | 57 | 1820 | 31.92 | 3/ 7 | 52.09 | 19.00 |
| West Indies | 19 | 99 | 3011 | 30.72 | 6/ 15 | 53.83 | 16.50 |
| Sri Lanka | 15 | 93 | 2715 | 29.83 | 4/ 17 | 51.56 | 23.25 |
| New Zealand | 15 | 81 | 1998 | 24.97 | 3/ 8 | 51.55 | 27.00 |
And now a look at the pairs who have opened for Sri Lanka during this period. There are 15 in all, but seven who've done so at least five times. Among them, the best stats, by a long way, belong to the Dilshan-Paranavitana combination: in 32 innings they average 41.80, with a best of 207 against England at Lord's last year. Since then, though, the pair has slumped, adding only 157 runs in their next ten partnerships, which led to Paranavitana being dropped in favour of Lahiru Thirimanne for the home series against England. In fact, Sri Lanka have tried various combinations among Dilshan, Paranavitana, Thirimanne, Michael Vandort and Malinda Warnapura, but they haven't yet settled on a consistent combination. In terms of batting averages of these openers, Dilshan is the only one with an average of 40. Some of the others have averages in the 30s, but Thirimanne has disappointed so far, averaging 19.84 in 14 innings. A couple of them will probably get more chances against Pakistan - all of Sri Lanka will be hoping they finally get the combination right this time.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Ave stand | 100/ 50 stands | Run rate | Balls per dism. |
| Dilshan-Paranavitana | 32 | 1296 | 41.80 | 2/ 10 | 3.92 | 63.94 |
| Vandort-Warnapura | 13 | 359 | 27.61 | 1/ 1 | 3.15 | 52.46 |
| Paranavitana-Thirimanne | 8 | 184 | 26.28 | 0/ 1 | 1.95 | 80.57 |
| Paravitana-Warnapura | 8 | 195 | 24.37 | 0/ 2 | 3.83 | 38.12 |
| Dilshan-Thirimanne | 5 | 118 | 23.60 | 0/ 1 | 4.34 | 32.60 |
| Tharanga-Vandort | 7 | 114 | 16.28 | 0/ 0 | 3.33 | 29.29 |
| Jayasuriya-Tharanga | 7 | 107 | 15.28 | 0/ 0 | 5.13 | 17.86 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (81)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
I think it's high time we look beyond Dilshan & get 2 yougsters for the opening slot. Thirimanne should be given more chances, he is proving to be a gutsy player & playing in the top order in Test cricket will do a world of good to him. Why not try Chandimal? For me, these 2 are the most talented out of the lot & an opportunity to bat together will help them create a bond like Sanga & Mahela. Dilshan can move down the order & he can combat the 2nd new ball when the bowlers are tired & the pitch is old. With a Strong middle order with Sanga, Mahela, Thilan, Dilshan & Angelo/Prasanna, we can look forward for a good 3-4 years.
Posted by muski on (June 2, 2012, 16:21 GMT)This is the making of SLCB. Somehow down the line they went the BCCI way of get politicised. Marvan was shown the door when he had enough and more years in him. They are yet to recover from Murali's retirement.With Sanga, Mahela and Dilshan on the wrong side of thirties, things dont look too rosy for Lankan Test Cricket.
Posted by Ultra_Sl_Cricket on (June 2, 2012, 14:00 GMT)Hey yo, why have everybody forgotten how good Upul Tharanga and T.Dilshan were?
Posted byJonothinjosephs: One of the most hilarious suggestions! Sanath is a proper recognized batsman not an outright slogger. He came to SL squad in 1989 Aus tour on the merit of two double hundreds in SL A tour of Pakistan. He made his test debut against NZ in 1990/91 tour because Mahanama got injured in first test and took no further part in that tour. Although Haturu was flown in as replacement opener to make his debut Sri Lanka decided to play an extra batsman and Sanath got opportunity and scored 35 batting at No. 6 ahead of Arjuna who was not well. After that Sanath did score runs but could not find a permanent slot in an established line-up. First attempt to open with him against Pak failed badly and it was only after he opened and scored maiden hundred against Aus in 1996 he started opening regularly. Still on few occasions he was forced to move down the order. So how can Thisara with no real technique succeed as an opener when even a recognized batsman found it difficult in tests?
Posted by sea620 on (June 2, 2012, 4:53 GMT)Chandimal also can be used as an opener.
Posted bywhy we are not trying with bhanuka rajapaksha? Left hander with handy legspiner
Posted by johnathonjosephs on (June 1, 2012, 20:52 GMT)Thissara Perera needs to open with Dilshan. Remember when Jayasuriya (thought to be a spinner) was promoted from 7th position to opening? Revolutionized Sri Lankan cricket
Posted by SLGirl on (June 1, 2012, 19:12 GMT)All of you don't understand...this is not statistcs about SL openers. It is: how bad the SL selection is? Dilshan-Paranavitana has the best record. Why can't they stick with it. Para is getting better at it? SL selection is to blame. Para including Vandort and Warnapura were good. But they never got a good run.
Posted by DaDaL0G on (June 1, 2012, 17:17 GMT)@kavum if Tamim is that good then why he was dropped for a long time ?? and why Bangladesh isnt at the top of ranking table if he can put 100 Partnership with everyone ?
Posted byLasitha, I agree wth you fully. The senior opener should set the example. Sanath Jayasuriya did have a weakness outside the off stump throughout his career. But he did put his head down in test cricket and played some really long innings. Dilshan is just playing reckless shots and getting out. It is like playing to the gallery. Test cricket is not IPL. Bowlers can afford to have plenty of catchers behind the wicket and risk been hit for few boundaries.He adds value to the team through his outstanding fielding and part time bowling. But that alone cannot keep him in the team. Even Jonty Rhodes could not seal a permanent spot in SA test team because he was not scoring enough runs on a consistent basis. If you are selected to open you should perform that job. We need to find a solid opening pair, even if they are not aggressive it does not matter. Certainly Dilshan is not the answer.