October 14, 2013

Chittagong pitch helps no one

The batsmen got some batting practice, but otherwise it was soul-sapping stuff

If it hadn't been for Brendon McCullum's bold declaration on the final day, Test No. 2097 would have been a contender for history's most drab. Once Bangladesh posted 501 in reply to New Zealand's 469, the match seemed destined for a draw. Other four-letter "d" words might suffice - dull, dire, dead. Regardless of your choice, it was going to take an extraordinary set of circumstances to extract anything but a drawn verdict. The more cynical might extend the description to "drawn out". A couple of Bangladeshi players were even captured yawning when the New Zealanders emerged for their second innings. Can you imagine that happening in the Ashes?

New Zealand laid careful plans building towards this series. Several of the Test squad participated in an A tour to India and Sri Lanka to help them adjust to the subcontinent; others opted for a training camp in Sri Lanka, while the Otago contingent played in the Champions League. A shortcoming was the solitary washed-out warm-up match, but it was still better preparation than nothing ahead of last year's calamitous series through the West Indies, India and Sri Lanka.

Regardless of pre-match circumstances, attaining a result on a placid pitch looked a tough ask. The New Zealand pace bowlers exerted themselves for little reward on lifeless soil. Conversely, batsmen could stand and deliver. Peter Fulton even donned a white floppy hat, for goodness sake, while caps were de rigueur for a number of others.

International cricketers have to be capable of playing on any surface but looking at the barren tarmac of Chittagong, the New Zealand arsenal could be forgiven for pangs of despondency.

Thud. That was the sound heard for the majority of the Test, as Doug Bracewell and Trent Boult hit the pitch sheen with a roughed-up ball and it ballooned to the wicketkeeper. They got the odd one to zing with the newer ball - particularly when they pitched up - but it resembled the "strongman game" at a fairground; backs being bent for little reward.

The spinners got little purchase either. At times it looked like they were endeavouring to rip the ball off glass. Stealth was the watchword; sneak the ball past when the batsman has played through his shot or when he hits across the line.

Like McCullum's initiative, at least Bangladesh allrounder Sohag Gazi infused a touch of the unexpected as the first player to get a maiden Test century and a hat-trick in the same Test. He and fellow centurion Mominul Haque were the antidote to any mild bowling venom generated by the visitors in the first innings. They also used their feet well to the largely ineffectual Bruce Martin and Ish Sodhi. Both spinners opted for fuller rather than shorter length deliveries (nothing could have been worse than bowling short on that wicket), but it enabled the Bangladeshis to drive at will. Matters weren't helped when Martin dropped a caught-and-bowled off Gazi on 65 when Bangladesh were 439 for 8. Gazi and Robiul Islam posted an untroubled 105-run ninth-wicket stand despite having pre-Test averages south of 15. The low, slow wickets allowed batsmen to play without fear of pace or bounce. It was a case of wait for the ball and play it late.

Still, the New Zealand lower order showed pep too, with a 127-run tenth-wicket partnership between BJ Watling and Trent Boult. Another bonus for New Zealand was the solid opening stands between Hamish Rutherford and Fulton, who acquired some of the best batting practice they will get outside the nets. Rutherford, as has become customary, played several well-timed strokes through the covers in another abridged innings. Since his century on debut in Dunedin against England, he has had ten innings, six of which have seen him dismissed between 23 and 42. He's struggling to bat time.

Williamson shone with his fourth Test century in 26 Tests (and third on the subcontinent). He seemed to relish the extra time watching the ball on to the bat and compiling at will for 114 and 74. It was a skill that proved more vital than usual as the game went into slow motion. At times it was like bullet time in The Matrix.

Pre-match, McCullum had chuckled about the prospect of playing on a pitch bereft of grass. As a result, Sodhi's debut was never in doubt. He proceeded to show promise with his rhythm, loop and speed. If he can eliminate the one or two pressure-valve release four-balls each over he'll be a genuine threat.

McCullum must hope he will one day get to use the services of Daniel Vettori again in subcontinental conditions. Martin (2 for 175) and Sodhi (3 for 169) struggled to penetrate. Six of the 13 Bangladesh wickets were taken by spin compared to 16 of New Zealand's 17. Notably, when McCullum opted for spin in the second innings he went to part-timer Williamson first, followed immediately by Martin.

Vettori is a while away from being ready for the home summer as he rehabilitates from a June Achilles tendon operation in London. He will soon play club cricket.

The bigger solution on the pitch issue is for the ICC to invest in developing more balanced wickets with bounce and carry to help the Bangladesh game.

It's not like the pitch conditions did the hosts any favours. The ground has now hosted 11 Test matches since 2006 and produced eight results (all won by Bangladesh's opposition). The flipside is Bangladesh are struggling overseas on wickets contrasting dramatically to their own. Until that changes they will be anchored at No. 10 in the world rankings.

Andrew Alderson is cricket writer at New Zealand's Herald on Sunday

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on October 18, 2013, 12:27 GMT

    It takes quite a lot to draw a test match. If Bangladesh draws a test then people like Mr. Alderson would say 'oh no! Bangladesh will never learn if they make pitches like chittagong.' And bangladesh loses a test match then the critics will take us on their sword. In fact we have nowhere to go. If we make turning pitches and earn a test win then critics will say same. Forgetting everything our boys main task should be perform well and beat the kiwis in dhaka. We don't have to listen to our so called critics. GO TIGERS!

  • Dummy4 on October 18, 2013, 4:25 GMT

    (cont'd)Gordon Greenidge scored 214 not out in 242 balls in that innings. Desmond Haynes, Viv Richards and Clive Lloyd were some of the batsmen to follow. If you really consider Bangladesh in the same league; undoubtedly you see something which we Bangladeshi's are not being capable to find!

  • Dummy4 on October 18, 2013, 4:15 GMT

    To say the least,this is a below par, biased report.Draw is a quite common and acceptable result in test cricket! Just the other day everybody was crying about Bangladesh's inability to even draw a match, and now when they've achieved that, the pitch and mentality of Bangladeshi's are being questioned! How many of the innumerable drawn tests were played on green-tops or rank turners, Mr. Alderson?New Zealand run rate in this test is 2.98 and 3.18 in the first and second innings; whereas the corresponding figure for Bangladesh is 3.36 and 3.57. Still it is Bangladesh who is at fault!You talk about 'bold'declaration by McCullum: if 256 in 45 overs on the fifth day is bold, I don't know what in this world is to be considered 'safe'!If I'm not wrong, West Indies (344/1)winning against England in 1984 is the only instance where a team scored at more than 5 an over(5.19 to exact) chasing more than 250 in the fourth innings.That west Indies team was regularly winning 5-0 against England!

  • Dummy4 on October 17, 2013, 16:23 GMT

    i think we can be happy if we do not make well in foreign soil. All the sub continent super power was struggling all the way. We just want to win in home soil using our best benefit pitch like spinning pitch. Why the writer of this article is too much concern about the pitch. it was the defensive strategy for BD.

  • Dik on October 17, 2013, 2:21 GMT

    The Dhaka pitch has always been a low spinning wicket. Can wait to hear these kiwi reporters' excuses then. I bet they'd cry to ICC to ban spinning pitches too.

  • Dik on October 17, 2013, 2:12 GMT

    Love, LOVE this comment section. Almost no one agrees with this typical, biased pitch bashing article that comes out after every match gets played in the Subcont. Also, bold declaration? Really? 250+, 45 overs, on a 5th day pitch, against the lowest ranked test team, is bold? In only 23 occasions a team successfully chased that sort of target. If that was a bold decision then I don't know what you'd call what I'm doing right now. I decided to take the stairs instead of the elevator as I type this on my phone, 5 floors! That's bold! That's MEGA BOLD. Bold would have been a declaration before lunch. If any body should be thanked for making that game interesting it should be Gazi, for his MoM performance. NZ's failure to stop him on either side of the ball was more pathetic than this article.

  • Dummy4 on October 16, 2013, 7:20 GMT

    Andrew Andrew Andrew...tsk tsk tsk. I think you were the one napping instead of watching this Test match which was anything *but* drab, dull, dire, dread.

    This Test was filled with intrigue. How spectacular was that catch from Shakib to help Gazi complete the hat-trick? Those moments passed by in slow motion. If that isn't enjoyable then I don't know what is.

    Sohag Gazi created *HISTORY*...this treble has *never* happened before in over ONE HUNDRED years of Test cricket. Every Bangladeshi citizen can be proud of the contributions Bangladesh cricket has made to world cricket. Lest we forget, just a year ago Abul Hasan scored a century on debut batting at number 10. This didn't happen in *110* years.

    For a nation that many think shouldn't be playing Test cricket, Bangladeshi cricketers are smashing *Test match records* left and right.

    My Ds for this Test match? Dramatic, dynamic, delightful, and downright dandy!

  • Android on October 15, 2013, 11:23 GMT

    hmm. some great comments from you guys thanks.

  • Nayeem on October 15, 2013, 8:44 GMT

    I beg to disagree with Andrew Anderson. Every country make pitches that suites the home team, we don't see Newzealand, Australia or South Africa making spin friendly low pitches at home just so that they can play better in India, Pakistan, Srilanka or Bangladesh. Then why should sub continent teams make fast, bouncy pitches? Zimbabwe, Newzealand Ireland struggle bad in spinning track, yet there is not a single low, turning tracks in those nations.. Bangladesh should create fast, bouncy track at 1-2 grounds for domestic matches only, so that the players can learn the skills for overseas tours. But BD should never create fast tracks at home while facing other test nations, this will be suicide!

  • Sarfin on October 15, 2013, 5:53 GMT

    And I think you made another mistake. This test was a really good one with lots of twists and fight backs. Here are some instances: NZ 276/3 to 342/9 (BD fight back). NZ 342/9 to 469/10 (NZ fight back). BD 8/2 to 301/4 (BD fight back). BD 301/5 to 501/10 (BD fight back). Any of those periods of the game could have gone bad for any side and cost them the match. So if you were watching it closely you could find enough fire in this match. Having said that I believe the pitch was not good enough. But the match was not dull/dead/dire at all.

  • No featured comments at the moment.