David Hopps
David Hopps David HoppsRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
UK editor, ESPNcricinfo

The Ashes 203-14

Time for Trott to seek new truths

England's vast support network provides for a player's every needs. Perhaps in a curious way that is part of the problem

David Hopps

November 26, 2013

Comments: 23 | Text size: A | A

Jonathan Trott trudges back to the pavilion , England v Australia, 3rd Investec Test, Old Trafford, 3rd day, August 3, 2013
Jonathan Trott has found few ways to escape his obsession © Getty Images
Enlarge

England could not have been more anxious to underline that they cared about the well-being of Jonathan Trott. The ECB's outgoing managing director, Hugh Morris was anxious to stress it at every opportunity. So, too, did the team director Andy Flower. There is no intention to question their good intentions because both are decent men.

But high-level sport burns people, and always will, and there was no doubt about the acrid smell in the air. Trott, as committed a cricketer as it is possible to be, has become collateral damage in an Ashes series that England's captain, Alastair Cook, had described as a war. There have been six of these wars in a little over four months and there are still four to come until early in the New Year.

This is how we like our sport: hard, unyielding, the outfield scarred with winners and losers. Failure has never been less forgiven. But as Trott flew back to the UK - and to imagine his state of mind on that endless flight is to reflect upon a heavily-curtained exhaustion, a feeling of nothingness, that we can barely contemplate - a comment by an England player last summer came to mind.

For his own sake, his identity will remain secret because his assessment went to the heart of England's approach. "It can feel as if there is no escape," he said. "It as if everything you do is being assessed, as if every little thing you do is being marked and analysed and stored away. If you are not careful, it can wear you down. It's incredibly difficult to come to terms with it."

England talk proudly of their extensive "support network", and there is no larger or more committed backroom staff in cricket. But the primary focus of England's support network, naturally enough, is to win cricket matches. Duty of Care is the fall back position if the overriding desire for victory malfunctions. The "bottom line", as Flower had it, is simply that England fight back in the second Test in Adelaide.

It was revealing that Flower compared Trott's long-term management of his illness to a player managing a long-running hamstring problem. In both cases, the top player wants to be fit to play and the management's priority is to get that player on the field. It is not entirely clear how concerned England were ahead of the first Test, but Trott's state of mind will have been carefully monitored. They patched him up and got them out there, and it is exactly what he would have wanted. You have to put yourself on the line for sporting glory and financial rewards few can dream of.

England's improved performances over the past decade have been won in a very English way: by the use of their financial muscle and superior organisation to measure the impact of everything which might impact on England's performance to a small degree. We have recently alighted on the fact that there is a 72-page England cookbook and, wondering if maybe things were getting out of proportion, and feeling frivolous, we had a laugh about it. But that is one example among many.

Michael Atherton, an England captain in a simpler age, wondered to Flower upon the news of Trott's departure if this micro-management had inadvertently become part of the problem. It was a good question. Flower responded by listing the outings organised on behalf of England's players to help them gain a perspective on life: the battlefield at Ypres, a burns unit in Dhaka, an orphanage in Kolkata and the visit ahead of the Ashes tour to a recovery unit in Surrey for injured servicemen. All of them are designed with good intentions to remind the players that playing international sport is essentially something to be cherished.

Yet even these trips have serious intent and represent just another aspect of their lives that are organised on an England cricketer's behalf, crammed from time to time into a packed international schedule. There is not much room for self-ownership, for the refreshment found in individual liberty, for encouragement for a player to broaden his mind in whatever way a person chooses as long as it does not involve cricket.

Atherton concluded in The Times: "Every whim is catered for. The impression is of a closed, institutionalised and claustrophobic world." He might have added "obsessive".

The next time an England player falls off a pedalo in the early hours of the morning it will probably emerge that it was part of a study into whether the combination of salt water and exercise could create a faster recovery from alcoholic excess.

Perhaps for their own state of mind what all England players need is the chance to find themselves once in a while, to behave as human beings not cricketers, to spend more time in any way they want to spend it, to get to 11 o'clock at night and think: "I skipped the gym today and, do you know, I'm not guilty about it."

To learn that Alastair Cook works long hours on the farm or that Graeme Swann still occasionally sings in the band is a good thing. Coping mechanisms are being quietly replenished. On spare days in summer, though, many of us grouse that they are not doing their bit by playing more county cricket.

Trott can be assured of committed professional support. The experience provided by Marcus Trescothick's illness changed English cricket forever. "We have spent a lot of time and effort making sure we have the best possible support services in place," Morris said. "We have an outstanding medical team. They have access to a network of consultants in various medical disciplines and whether a player is physically injured or has a mental illness they will be provided with the best possible care. It is something we take very seriously in conjunction with the PCA."

Stress-related illness, depression, call it what you will - because it is a generic description for conditions which are finally being recognised, but which are far from understood - can strike anywhere. Statistics from the Mental Health Foundation suggest that 9 per cent of people in the UK reach the criteria for medical diagnosis in any one year. Crudely put, that equates to one per cricket team.

Trott should draw strength from the fact that stress-related depression has been referred to as the Carers' Illness: often suffered by those with high standards and aspirations, those who seek to fulfil their potential and when they meet obstacles do not give up but fight ever harder, ever more obsessively, often finally to their own detriment. If he proves to have played his last for England, he has given his all. There is no shame whatsoever in that.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: David Hopps

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Srini9 on (November 30, 2013, 22:14 GMT)

add on to my last post. I think it is best to send a travell ticket to J. Trot to travel back to Aus, ask him to bat at as one down batsman as he is, he will deliver better at that, rather than thinking about whether Root, Bell or KP should be at that one down. Aus team think they chased the J. Trot, but give that ticket to Trot, he will chase them all, just one good innings, Trot is been selected as top oder batsman, nobody selects if a player is incapable of playing at top 6. Mr. Andy Flower, tell Austailians J. Trot forgotten his track suit. he is coming for second test, you still have three days to ask the player to travel back and joing the team and playing for Eng.

No need to shy for anything.....Srini

Posted by Srini9 on (November 30, 2013, 20:07 GMT)

Lot of people talking about Mr. J Trot has stress related illness, but I think Eng cricket management poorly handled this matter, if you keep on ask players to pack up back bags with wrong reasons, then you better ask to pack the bags of whole team. A Sport is Sport, if somebody trying to expose you, you need to cover it. The best thing that should have been done by Andy Flower, was even if Trot said I am not feeling confident, They should have given full support, not to pack bags, but stay on the tour. What do you do Aus team in their den keep doing that acts to all your playing 11? ask them to pack the bags or what? poor management...sending a player back means, you showing the back of your, thats as simple as that, Eng Managemnt trying take excuse, it in iteself Managemnt in stress related illness

Srini

Posted by millsy24 on (November 28, 2013, 10:43 GMT)

Paul Rone-Clarke, when the England team is out here, do the players' families not come out for Christmas? They used to. I am starting to come around to this. England are being micro-managed. The ridiculous dietary requirements said it. To tell catering companies what and how to prepare to the absolute letter is a little over the top and nothing else will suffice? What? Watson is another example. Finished the season here, played in India and had his first child, straight on to England for the Champion's Trophy and then Ashes, back to India for the IPL, Champion's League and ODI series and now back here for these Ashes. The Aussie team are under fairly tough restrictions, but nowhere near what it seems the England team are. Another post said they only play something like 65 days a year for tests, true, but even still all sportsmen and women need some down time.

Posted by   on (November 28, 2013, 9:38 GMT)

England tour for far too long. They also don't allow families on tour. It's no surprise that those affected most had young families (babies) 100% of them Harmison, Trerscothick, Yardy, Flintoff, Trott, Hoggard all fell ill on tour - all had young families at home - all were asked to be away form 3 months plus without seeing them. If people like Jeremy Snape can't see the pattern here he needs to take a close look at how he's analysing these things

Posted by pestonji on (November 27, 2013, 18:26 GMT)

Try spending five days dawdling on a filed doing nothing most of the time. Multiply that by five test matches and several warm up matches. Multiply that by about two or three times a year. Add the fact that none of the matches mean anything since there is no world championship in test cricket or a points system. And by the way most of this is happening when you are five thousand miles away from home and family. AND, test cricket is not really what pays your bills-its T20. Stress, what stress????

Posted by cooljack_143 on (November 27, 2013, 18:12 GMT)

Author mentions here as the WAR between two teams, for me "war" means huge huge thing.Oh come on this is a simple sport why do you want to use such words. That itself feels stressful, forget about players there!!!

Posted by Brahams on (November 27, 2013, 16:01 GMT)

@C.Gull, Sorry mate, this article is about handling stress. J. Trott is a case study, and so is Tendulkar and Trescothick.

Obviously, we need such comparisons to appreciate and understand the pressures of 21st century cricket.

Posted by C.Gull on (November 27, 2013, 11:04 GMT)

Really good article with an angle I haven't seen elsewhere. Speaking as an introvert, I know I need proper solo downtime on a regular basis or else stress simply accumulates, whether I've been at work, amongst friends, whatever. It's hard to imagine living in such a micro-managed system as the English cricket team - it must feel like living in the international space station at times.

PS. This article has nothing to do with Tendulkar.

Posted by   on (November 27, 2013, 0:57 GMT)

These stress breakdown of good players even more shows greatness of Tendulkar. there could be quite a few guys who can go past Sachin, but that needs them to endure all these for a minimum of 15 years, and we are already seeing a great guy like Trott unable to cope up with it only after 5 years of International cricket

Posted by guesswhat555 on (November 26, 2013, 23:49 GMT)

Most people play cricket cuz they are in love with this game. There has to be something really wrong when something you love is stressing you out. Unfortunately it looks like something is not right with how the english players are managed (may be I'm wrong) .4-5 players in last few years out due to stress related issues are pretty big warning signs in my opinion.

Posted by   on (November 26, 2013, 21:03 GMT)

This proves beyond doubt how great one Mr. Sachin Tendulkar is. He absorbed all presures of a ever so demanding and unapologetic India, still survived and performed for more than two decades.

Posted by   on (November 26, 2013, 12:39 GMT)

Seen on the TV that Marcus Trescothick, Jeremy Snape and others claiming that cricket is no different to any other sport. I would say it is. Trescothick, Yardy and Trott all succumbed while TOURING. When Harmison and Flintoff were on TV about a year ago , the clear and oft repeated issue was TOURING. Unlike most other sports, cricket tours are long. A Football World cup comes once every 4 years and a team that make the final might be out of their country for a month. Most cricket tours England are 2-3 months and England often have more than one a year. From October to the following April some England players are away 5 and a half out of 7 months. I don't think it's any coincidence that the high profile players fell ill while on tour and those are the issues that Flintoff, Hoggard and Harmison had as well. Being away from home and loved ones, essp with babies and young children at home can be extremely hard. England need a larger group to call on or tour a little less.

Posted by sparth on (November 26, 2013, 12:28 GMT)

hmm... bit disappointed at the ECB here. If someone is getting stressed at work then they should have addressed it earlier. Clearly Trott's form has not been the best and they shouldn't have picked him.

Posted by   on (November 26, 2013, 11:30 GMT)

Excellent article. Not just Jonathan Trott, the entire England team are not enjoying their cricket due to the stifling environment that has been created by the team management. If they want to give the players more perspective let them go out and smell the roses as it were and have some fun, not just organised trips to visit those less fortunate then themselves. You need to view both ends of the spectrum to have a more rounded view on life.

Posted by WheresTheEmpire on (November 26, 2013, 10:53 GMT)

An interesting article that gets beyond the superficial. Top level sport burns people (primarily coaches and players) due to the, sometimes inadvertent, pressure for success from administrators, media and fans. Perhaps, most at risk are those coaches and players who already have a tendency towards being obsessive.

The problem can affect anyone or any team, however the change in the Aussies (enjoyment levels + success) from under Arthur to under the seemingly less obsessive Lehmann may provide lessons for anyone interested best practice team leadership.

Posted by Narkovian on (November 26, 2013, 10:38 GMT)

@TheGimp. I am not just referring to Tests. These guys are on the go about 10 months a year, basically with the same group of people. So many pointless ODIs, T20s etc as well as Tests. Even during the Domestic Season they don't go back to their counties, they just basically stay together as a Group. At least on IPL they see different people ! Many of us probably played Club Cricket in our day. can you imagine having to be with those guys we played with 24/7 for months on end? !! It would send me stark raving bonkers.

Posted by   on (November 26, 2013, 10:06 GMT)

The truth is that England in their attempt not to recreated their past when players were picked and left on their own have done the opposite but with the same consequences. It has created an ivy league set up and removed their players from he real world. Taking them to visit hosipitals means nothing to ...hollywood stars do it all the time. They are protected even then from the true horrors. Sorry to say but Endland is the only team where this happens and im affraid that they have made the players too soft in the head.

Posted by Thegimp on (November 26, 2013, 9:42 GMT)

Narkovian, just a few years ago players were complaining about too much cricket. The respective boards started reacting and organised shorter tours with three test series and seperate one day series so that players could be rotated through. Just when they thought they had it right IPL starts and players jump at the chance to fill their pockets in a six week dash for cash. So no, they can play less if they wish by either opting out of T20 or 50/50, they can stop playing tests and just play the other two. No-one is holding a gun to their head. Realistically Australia have played 3 tests in India, 5 in England and 5 in Australia this year. I would hardly call that onerous, 65 days of test cricket!!!!

Posted by   on (November 26, 2013, 9:40 GMT)

Nice article. The 'England Management' need to realize that scientific management of players, which seems to involve thinking that rational prescriptions of desired behavior mediated by a diverse range of experts (e.g. to micro-schedule, surveil (often called monitor), ensure optimal diets, etc, etc..) is the same as supporting the players. Supporting players and scientifically managing their performance are two quite different things that are not always mutually reinforcing. Over the past few weeks there are two bits of evidence, which suggest to me that 'England Management' has completely lost perspective and are practicing an extreme form of Taylorism in running their team (1) was the Flower's defensive comment in response to Michael Atherton's thoughtful question about England's management approach being part of the problem, 'Flower responded by listing the outings organized on behalf of England's players to help them gain a perspective on life'. (2) was the ridiculously peda

Posted by Nutcutlet on (November 26, 2013, 9:37 GMT)

Although I've been a supporter of the fastidious planning (and planning implies care) of the Fletcher/Flower years, this article has brought my thoughts on this into sharper focus. Overall, the benefits have been undeniable: with the odd glitch, England wins Tests, wins series. That's fine & well done. Professional sport is increasingly intolerant of failure; heads roll quickly without success. Planning insures against failure. There's been great emphasis on nurturing the team ethic & the very stuctured approach that reflects the mangement's desire to keep everyone bonding through sharing, even in down-time. The catalogue of extra-curricular sorties given here are all subtly related to the main agenda suggesting that the team ethic has morphed into something close to where one size-fits-all & this is precisely the flaw in the system. Myers- Briggs tests (MBTI) will tell them that. It's worth revisiting that to provide the best nurturing for each team member. It's not ALL about Team.

Posted by Rowayton on (November 26, 2013, 9:32 GMT)

I agree with Narkovian about the excess of international cricket - and Rugby come to that. However one wonders if the players are willing to earn less, which would have to be the result of playing less. And yes, the English 'support network' do sound like a bunch of control freaks.

Posted by Narkovian on (November 26, 2013, 8:57 GMT)

Interesting article. But one over-riding thing springs to mind... We must have LESS International cricket. Give players much more time away from the treadmill. Get away from the environment of constant hotels/travel/same old 15 people/same old jokes/ same old opposition . If its getting to their heads, I can assure you its also getting to mine.. and I only watch it.!

Posted by vswami on (November 26, 2013, 7:47 GMT)

Sportsmen have to feel the joy of playing. Thats why they took up the profession in the first place. If the whole process is mechanised to the nth degree, its obvious they will feel they are being treated like machines. When emotions collide with machines, its emotions that will get crushed.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
David HoppsClose
David Hopps David Hopps joined ESPNcricinfo as UK editor early in 2012. For the previous 20 years he was a senior cricket writer for the Guardian and covered England extensively during that time in all Test-playing nations. He also covered four Olympic Games and has written several cricket books, including collections of cricket quotations. He has been an avid amateur cricketer since he was 12, and so knows the pain of repeated failure only too well. The pile of untouched novels he plans to read, but rarely gets around to, is now almost touching the ceiling. He divides his time between the ESPNcricinfo office in Hammersmith and his beloved Yorkshire.

'Chanderpaul was always out to prove himself'

Modern Masters: Playing in a weak team, his single-minded focus is to be the best he can be

    The Bangladesh album

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at the side's international highlights: from shocking Pakistan in 1999 to whitewashing New Zealand

South Africa's domestic spinners eye their chance

Firdose Moonda: Ahead of the first-class season, we look at the players the selectors will be watching closely

    Catch dodgy actions early

Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level

Four Pakistan women to watch in the Asian Games

Ahmer Naqvi: A look at two bowlers and two batsmen who could be crucial to their campaign in Incheon

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

85 Tests, 70 defeats

Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

News | Features Last 7 days