Pakistan v South Africa, 4th ODI, Multan October 26, 2007

Call in the pinch-hitter

Shaun Pollock suits the role of the pinch-hitter, technically competent enough to bat at various tempos and in different situations. With that in mind, it wasn't such a surprise to see him coming in one down here

Why hasn't Shaun Pollock batted up the order more often? © Getty Images

Mickey Arthur said before this match he had a plan to counter the middle-over tangle South Africa have found themselves in twice against Pakistan's spinners. It turned out to be one of the oldest modern-day ODI tactics: call in the pinch-hitter.

For intangible reasons, the use of the pinch-hitter - a lower-order batsman sent up the order - has faded in recent years. Maybe it was just a passing mid-90s fad, as opposed to a full-blown trend. Maybe the definition of a pinch-hitter has become more fluid: aren't players nowadays expected to be multi-dimensional anyway? The game has quickened up, sides are loaded with big-hitting proper batsmen, and perhaps the pinch-hitter is now expected to be a proper batsman and not just some fluke chancer.

Irfan Pathan was a recent, prolonged example of the tactic, though some might argue he has become a better batsman than bowler by the end of it. But in its time, for shock value, the promotion of a lower-order batsman to capitalise on a good start, or provide impetus to a faltering one, was often priceless. Who can forget Chetan Sharma's only hundred, against England, or Bob Woolmer's use of the sensational Lance Klusener up the order or little Romesh Kaluwitharana's 1996 madness?

Some players, allrounders particularly, are ideal for the job. Chris Cairns and Ian Harvey were good enough batsmen to occasionally pull it off. Even Abdul Razzaq did it well enough, but Pakistan's traditional problems with opening often forced him, like Imran Khan during the 1992 World Cup, to become as much a pinch-blocker at as an aggressor.

Shaun Pollock suits the role too, technically competent enough to bat at various tempos and in different situations. With that in mind, it wasn't such a surprise to see him coming in one down here. To learn, however, that it was only the fourth time he had done it in his entire career was a considerably greater one. And the other three occasions were hardly serious attempts to sway a match. Why he hasn't been used in the role more often, especially based on the evidence of this innings, is difficult to fathom.

South Africa's starts have been good during this series but it is their middle order that has pottered about against Shahid Afridi and Abdur Rehman, not scoring enough runs and eventually losing their wickets. Pollock came in just as spin did, another good start already banked.

"Today we made some decisions and I am very grateful they came off," explained Graeme Smith later. "As captain you're happy that those gambles come off. Shaun came in and played superbly. Earlier in the year he got a hundred, which was great to see, and he's been craving the opportunity to get up the order, especially in these conditions. Today, with his experience, and Albie Morkel at the end of the innings, it allows us to do it. It was a superb knock."

That Pollock wasn't going to go the way of his middle-order men became immediately clear, and the manner in which he did it - a delicious, late cut off the last ball of the over for a boundary - set up the blueprint for the rest of his innings. This was no slog, for Pollock is no slogger.

Most of his subsequent strokeplay was composed of proper cricket shots; lofted drives straight down the ground, inside out drives over extra cover, solid pulls, and one near-perfect sweep. Among current batsmen Pollock's bat-swing is perhaps the one that comes closest to Brian Lara's in terms of beauty. At its top, before it swoops down for contact, it could be the swing of a golfer, coiled yet languid. His long arms also provide a useful, rubbery whip to his shots. The feet, and those long graceful strides in particular, were well employed to nullify the spin, not only reducing its threat, but turning it into a weakness for Pakistan.

Perhaps only the bat swing of Brian Lara compares to Pollock's in terms of beauty. At its top, before it swoops down for contact, it could be the swing of a golfer, coiled yet languid. His long arms also provide a useful rubbery whip to his shots

Eighty-four balls were enough to make you wonder why he is so much more acclaimed as a bowler. Alternatively, it tells you just how good a bowler he actually is, as a fantastic opening spell earlier in the day also made perfectly clear. But a batting average of 26 in nearly 300 matches, only one hundred, and now 13 fifties, does scant justice to a rare gift. This was his highest ODI score in South African colours, his solitary hundred coming for the Africa XI earlier this year.

"I enjoyed it today," Pollock said. "Graeme and Herschelle [Gibbs] got us off to a flier and my aim was to take advantage of the Powerplays. I enjoyed it, but there are some fantastic cricketers up there who normally do the job."

Those lower down are no less fantastic.

Osman Samiuddin is the Pakistan editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Kid on October 28, 2007, 4:40 GMT

    It makes you wonder if all those games against Australia (during his long Career) had of worked out differently if had of batted higher up the order.

  • tariq on October 27, 2007, 18:33 GMT

    hello its me tariq from swat i love southafrician team so much that when they los i begun to weep and pollock is my best player along with rhodes and oter at that time when gibbs got out i was also thinking that they should send morkel or pollock and when pollock came i was very happy i could also understand feelings of rhodes when pollock got out at 90 and he kicked i was laso litle bit sad that he should made it but its happen and he is great player

  • Mark on October 27, 2007, 14:06 GMT

    Batting matures later in life than fast bowling because the value of EXPERIENCE is marginally greater for the batsman whilst peak physical condition is more crucial for the fast bowler. Many genuine international allrounders were selected in their early twenties as bowlers who could bat a bit at 8 or 9, but later became genuine allrounders batting at six or seven, and finished as batsmen with reduced bowling workload (Kallis, these days ?). The greatest of all, Sobers, began as a bowler; world-class batsmanship came a little later. Keith Miller is another. Even "rabbit" batsmen become more durable rabbits at the end of their careers - McGrath ? Pollocks late-flowering batsmanship is unsurprising, one saw the same with Warne, Giles and Gillespie in recent times. And England has a young man - Broad - who NOW, at age 22, is a specialist bowler who everyone knows can hold his bat the right way up, but, WATCH - when he's 27 he will have replaced Flintoff and be making hundreds at 6 or 7.

  • amit on October 27, 2007, 9:52 GMT

    I think Pollock should be sent up the order more often.Pollock can contributr more with the bat now that his bowling is on the wane.

  • Kunal on October 27, 2007, 8:43 GMT

    Although the rest of the teams have not used pinch hitters of late, i think India have been regulary making use of them, what with Irfan Pathan and M S Dhoni both being promoted up the order every now and then.

  • Dinesh on October 27, 2007, 5:55 GMT

    The concept of a pinch hitter was first tried out by the indian great M L Jaisimha in a first class match in Cochin in the 70s. It so happened that the opposing team batting first made a mammoth score in 25 overs and when his teams turn came Jaisimha asked his no 10 and 11 batsmen to open the innings, shuffled the batting order completely, send in the bowlers to bat first, and asked them to swing at each and every ball. It worked and they broght down the asking rate and subsequently won the match.

  • Soham on October 27, 2007, 3:50 GMT

    MS Dhoni was used at no. 3 to up the ante during Greg Chappell's stint, during which he cracked a memorable 183* against Sri Lanka at Jaipur. Phil Defraitus was also sent up the order in the early 90's. Nicky Boje did the job with distinction in a series against New Zealand, cracking 2 hundreds in 3 matches from the no.3 slot. Matt Prior was used by England in recent series against India as an opener, though his performances can hardly be called memorable. Javagal Srinath, in his early days, was sent in at no.3 as India's version of the pinch-hitter, and he once made a breezy fifty (it ws actually from 69 balls) against South Africa. Wasim Akram was sent in twice at no.3 in 89/90 and made a total of 73 runs in 53 balls.

  • Kenny on October 27, 2007, 3:36 GMT

    A fantastic ploy by SA to counter-attack the Pak spin duo. Shaun Pollock is enjoying his batting a lot these days, while at the end of his glorious career. It seems like a trait these days that some bowlers, after bagging a ton of wickets through their career, tend to bat beautifully as they come closer to the end of their stint, maybe they are looking for greater challenges by then. Would like to see the Cricinfo staff pull out stats for greats like Wasim Akram, Kapil Dev, Shaun Pollock, Daniel Vettori, Shane Warne, etc, I'm sure there will be a parallel.

  • Kishore on October 27, 2007, 0:10 GMT

    I always said, Pollock should bat up the order .. Ian Chappel mentioned it many time .. May be Arthur and Smith getting the things right lately but they should have used Pollock up the order long time ago or maybe very often .. kinda waste of his batting talent .. Thumbs up for Pollock for this Performance...

  • Animesh on October 26, 2007, 22:19 GMT

    [Quote]Perhaps only the bat swing of Brian Lara compares to Pollock's in terms of beauty.[/Quote]

    What a comparison? Now Pollock is matching Lara? Dumb comment.

  • No featured comments at the moment.