RESULT
Group A, Worcester, April 25, 2010, Clydesdale Bank 40
144/9
(23.1/40 ov, T:145) 145/5
Sussex won by 5 wickets (with 101 balls remaining)
Ovs | Worcs | Sussex |
---|---|---|
1 | 1/0(1 run, 0 wkt) • • • • 1 • RR: 1.00 | 14/0(14 runs, 0 wkt) 1 1lb 4 • 4 4 RR: 14.00 • RRR:
3.35 • Runs req: 131 • Balls rem: 234 |
2 | 4/0(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 21/0(7 runs, 0 wkt) |
3 | 10/0(6 runs, 0 wkt) | 27/0(6 runs, 0 wkt) |
4 | 12/0(2 runs, 0 wkt) | 32/0(5 runs, 0 wkt) |
5 | 17/0(5 runs, 0 wkt) | 33/0(1 run, 0 wkt) |
6 | 23/0(6 runs, 0 wkt) | 40/0(7 runs, 0 wkt) |
7 | 28/0(5 runs, 0 wkt) | 45/1(5 runs, 1 wkt) |
8 | 29/1(1 run, 1 wkt) | 49/1(4 runs, 0 wkt) |
9 | 32/1(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 59/1(10 runs, 0 wkt) |
10 | 41/1(9 runs, 0 wkt) | 63/1(4 runs, 0 wkt) |
11 | 47/1(6 runs, 0 wkt) | 67/1(4 runs, 0 wkt) |
12 | 62/1(15 runs, 0 wkt) | 77/1(10 runs, 0 wkt) |
13 | 62/4(0 runs, 3 wkts) | 86/2(9 runs, 1 wkt) |
14 | 65/4(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 91/5(5 runs, 3 wkts) |
15 | 67/4(2 runs, 0 wkt) | 96/5(5 runs, 0 wkt) |
16 | 68/4(1 run, 0 wkt) | 97/5(1 run, 0 wkt) |
17 | 69/4(1 run, 0 wkt) | 99/5(2 runs, 0 wkt) |
18 | 72/4(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 113/5(14 runs, 0 wkt) |
19 | 74/4(2 runs, 0 wkt) | 120/5(7 runs, 0 wkt) |
20 | 77/5(3 runs, 1 wkt) | 124/5(4 runs, 0 wkt) |
21 | 79/5(2 runs, 0 wkt) | 129/5(5 runs, 0 wkt) |
22 | 82/5(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 137/5(8 runs, 0 wkt) |
23 | 85/5(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 143/5(6 runs, 0 wkt) |
24 | 88/5(3 runs, 0 wkt) | 145/5(2 runs, 0 wkt) |
25 | 90/5(2 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
26 | 91/5(1 run, 0 wkt) | - |
27 | 95/5(4 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
28 | 100/6(5 runs, 1 wkt) | - |
29 | 100/6(0 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
30 | 101/6(1 run, 0 wkt) | - |
31 | 105/6(4 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
32 | 108/6(3 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
33 | 111/6(3 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
34 | 113/7(2 runs, 1 wkt) | - |
35 | 118/7(5 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
36 | 127/7(9 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
37 | 131/7(4 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
38 | 134/8(3 runs, 1 wkt) | - |
39 | 137/9(3 runs, 1 wkt) | - |
40 | 144/9(7 runs, 0 wkt) | - |
Clydesdale Bank 40 News
Instant answers to T20 questions
Sussex Innings
<1 / 3>