New Zealand inquiry strikes similar problems to ACU

Investigation of allegations against former New Zealand captain Martin Crowe are striking problems similar to those outlined by Anti-Corruption Unit boss Sir Paul Condon.

While Crowe and his lawyer David Howman have been very helpful to the New Zealand investigating unit, more evidence is still required and inquiry units overseas.

In a statement today, the chairman of the New Zealand unit Sir Ian Barker said:

The publication of the Report by Sir Paul Condon has not altered the focus of the New Zealand Inquiry into statements about Martin Crowe contained in the Indian CBI Report.

Sir Paul's Report demonstrates some of the difficulties experienced by his Anti-Corruption Unit in obtaining evidence.

This Inquiry is to a large degree dependent on ACU assistance in obtaining access to primary evidence overseas referrable to the statements regarding Martin Crowe.

In New Zealand considerable progress has been made in preparation for the interview of Mr Crowe and receiving other evidence. While the interview is scheduled for June, it may yet be delayed depending on current inquiries by the ACU.

New Zealand Cricket through its Board and Sir John Anderson have provided whatever resource is needed for this Inquiry, and given an unfettered discretion as to how it should be conducted. Martin Crowe and his counsel David Howman have throughout provided full co-operation.

The Panel and those parties are concerned to see this Inquiry concluded as soon as possible, but only when all relevant evidence is obtained or else a point is reached that the Inquiry must proceed without it. Any other course would be unsatisfactory to this Panel, Martin Crowe and New Zealand Cricket.

It should be emphasised again that the Panel can proceed only with co-operation. From some quarters it has had that, and is pressing hard through all available channels for further information.