Not guilty, this time (29 January 1999)
West Indies captain Brian Lara found himself in the middle of a minor controversy in Durban on Wednesday when his appeal led to umpire Dave Orchard ruling Daryll Cullinan out handled ball
29-Jan-1999
29 January 1999
Not guilty, this time
Tony Becca
West Indies captain Brian Lara found himself in the middle of a minor
controversy in Durban on Wednesday when his appeal led to umpire Dave
Orchard ruling Daryll Cullinan out handled ball.
Although Law 36 states that "either batsman is out handled ball if he
touches it while in play with his hands, unless it be done at the
request of the opposite side", only one other batsman in the history
of one-day internationals has been dismissed for handling the ball,
and although there are those who support his action, there are many
who believe what Lara did was not cricket and that once again he has
embarrassed West Indies cricket.
As far as those fans are concerned, law or no law, Lara should not
have appealed - for the simple reason that it is common practice, at
every level of the game, for batsmen, including West Indians, to play
the ball, pick it up and lob it to a fielder without anyone
appealing.
On those occasions, however, certainly the ones I have seen, the ball
came to a stop harmlessly before the batsmen picked it up. That was
not the case with Cullinan.
In Durban on Wednesday, Cullinan cut a delivery from left-arm spinner
Keith Arthurton, the ball hit the pitch, bounced and he caught it.
The ball had not come to a stop, it is possible that if it had been
allowed to drop it could have spun on to the wicket and although the
batsman's action in catching it may have been instinctive and not
designed to prevent it from dropping, bouncing and rolling on to the
stumps, Lara had every right to appeal.
In condemning Lara, fans say he should have remembered the Durban
Test match when Franklyn Rose was run out and Hansie Cronje called
him back. That was indeed noble of the South African captain, but
although Rose was out, Cronje's conscience probably would have
bothered him had he not reacted in that way - for the simple reason
that Rose, the non-striker, was knocked to the ground as he took off
for the run by the bowler who bounced into him while going for the
ball.
There is hardly a captain who would not have called back Rose, or one
who would not have appealed against Cullinan. Although Lara would
have been protected by the law, although it is time batsmen stop
handling the ball, it would have been a different story had Cullinan
allowed the ball to drop and stop, picked it up, tossed it to a
fielder and was dismissed on the appeal of the West Indies captain.
That, because it has become the norm, would have been an
embarrassment - not what happened in Durban. In fact, if anyone
deserves to be chastised, it is Cullinan. Had a West Indian batsman
done what he did, hardly anyone in the West Indies would forgive him.
Source :: The Jamaica Gleaner (https://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/)