No changes at the top, Stirling and Mortaza lead the rest
An analysis of performances in the first eight games of the World Cup
Sean Williams came up with a match-winning performance against the UAE • Getty Images
This analysis will be done at suitable points during the World Cup 2015 so that the readers can see the way the Performance tables evolve. As more matches get played the top performance mosaic changes and readers can identify with what happened in the past few days. The qualifying bar for inclusion moves higher as more matches get played.
The second round of matches proved quite different to the first-four "Score big and win big" type of matches. A fancied team scored 300 but this was chased down by a team from the lower echelons quite comfortably. Then a sub-150 total proved tricky for a top team. A comfortable win followed next and then a near-300 total was chased, with some bumps on the way. All in all, we were back in typical World Cup territory.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 397 | 2015 | 3601 | DA Miller | South Africa | Zim | 138* | 92 |
2 | 386 | 2015 | 3600 | JWA Taylor | England | Aus | 98* | 90 |
3 | 370 | 2015 | 3600 | AJ Finch | Australia | Eng | 135 | 128 |
4 | 314 | 2015 | 3601 | JP Duminy | South Africa | Zim | 115* | 100 |
5 | 290 | 2015 | 3602 | V Kohli | India | Pak | 107 | 126 |
6 | 242 | 2015 | 3603 | PR Stirling | Ireland | Win | 92 | 84 |
7 | 238 | 2015 | 3603 | LMP Simmons | West Indies | Ire | 102 | 84 |
8 | 238 | 2015 | 3603 | NJ O'Brien | Ireland | Win | 79* | 60 |
9 | 227 | 2015 | 3603 | EC Joyce | Ireland | Win | 84 | 67 |
10 | 223 | 2015 | 3602 | Misbah-ul-Haq | Pakistan | Ind | 76 | 84 |
The top five batting performances stayed at the top. Then come Paul Stirling's innings which led the trio of match-winning innings for Ireland, Lendl Simmons' losing hundred for West Indies, Niall O'Brien's lovely finishing act and Ed Joyce's support act. The other winning fifty, by Sean Williams, just missed the cut. The lack of quality in UAE bowling was a major reason. As we cover more matches, the fifties would disappear and it would take an exceptional score below 100 to break into the top ten.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 458 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 5 |
2 | 427 | 2015 | 3602 | Sohail Khan | Pakistan | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 55 - 5 |
3 | 311 | 2015 | 3600 | ST Finn | England | Aus | 10.0 - 0 - 71 - 5 |
4 | 287 | 2015 | 3602 | Mohammed Shami | India | Pak | 9.0 - 1 - 35 - 4 |
5 | 220 | 2015 | 3605 | Mashrafe Mortaza | Bangladesh | Afg | 9.0 - 2 - 20 - 3 |
6 | 210 | 2015 | 3603 | GH Dockrell | Ireland | Win | 10.0 - 0 - 50 - 3 |
7 | 202 | 2015 | 3604 | JH Davey | Scotland | Nzl | 7.0 - 0 - 40 - 3 |
Same thing happens in bowling also. Mashrafe Mortaza, George Dockrell and Josh Davey come in at the later part of the table. It is understandable as no one even captured four wickets in this quartet of matches.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 510 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 23 | 20 | 9.0-0-33-5 |
2 | 281 | 2015 | 3599 | CJ Anderson | New Zealand | Slk | 75 | 46 | 3.1-0-18-2 |
3 | 278 | 2015 | 3606 | SC Williams | Zimbabwe | Uae | 76* | 65 | 8.0-0-43-2 |
4 | 251 | 2015 | 3605 | Shakib Al Hasan | Bangladesh | Afg | 63 | 51 | 8.5-0-43-2 |
The trend continues here also. At least we have two all-round performances making the cut. Sean Williams' truly match-winning innings of 76 was well supported by his two middle-order wickets and one catch. This performance was quite close to that of Corey Anderson on the first day. Shakib Al Hasan's performance was almost identical to that of Williams. One reason why his performance ranked slightly lower than Williams is his economy rate vis-a-vis the team rate.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 640 | 2015 | 3605 | Bangladesh | 267 for 10 in 50.0 | Afg | 162 for 10 in 42.5 |
2 | 596 | 2015 | 3600 | Australia | 342 for 9 in 50.0 | Eng | 231 for 10 in 41.5 |
3 | 596 | 2015 | 3599 | New Zealand | 331 for 6 in 50.0 | Slk | 233 for 10 in 46.1 |
4 | 592 | 2015 | 3602 | India | 300 for 7 in 50.0 | Pak | 224 for 10 in 47.0 |
5 | 590 | 2015 | 3603 | Ireland | 307 for 6 in 45.5 | Win | 304 for 7 in 50.0 |
6 | 588 | 2015 | 3604 | New Zealand | 146 for 7 in 24.5 | Sco | 142 for 10 in 36.2 |
7 | 574 | 2015 | 3601 | South Africa | 339 for 4 in 50.0 | Zim | 277 for 10 in 48.2 |
8 | 534 | 2015 | 3606 | Zimbabwe | 286 for 6 in 48.0 | Uae | 285 for 7 in 50.0 |
9 | 416 | 2015 | 3604 | Scotland | 142 for 10 in 36.2 | Nzl | 146 for 7 in 24.5 |
10 | 410 | 2015 | 3600 | England | 231 for 10 in 41.5 | Aus | 342 for 9 in 50.0 |
We have some real changes as far as team table is concerned. Bangladesh's very easy win goes to the top, with 640 points. The main reason for this is the fact that the win margin is around 40% of the team runs. A far easier win than those backed by first-innings totals of 300 runs. New Zealand lost out because they had lost too many wickets. The wicket-resource remaining was very little even though 50% of the ball-resource was still available. They are still in the top ten.
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems