South Africa's quarter-final win takes the top spot
An analysis of performances in the World Cup after the first quarter-final of the World Cup
Imran Tahir's 4 for 26 in the quarter-finals earned him the seventh place among top bowling performances • ICC
This analysis will be done at suitable points during the World Cup 2015 so that the readers can see the way the Performance tables evolve. As more matches get played the top performance mosaic changes and readers can identify with what happened in the past few days. The qualifying bar for inclusion moves higher as more matches get played.
This report incorporates the first quarter-final played between South Africa and Sri Lanka. All quarter-finals have a match importance index of 111 and are suitably weighed higher. This is reflected in the performances. To help the readers get the correct perspective, I am displaying the match index also in the tables.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | MatchIdx# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 579 | 2015 | 3616 | 100 | AB de Villiers | South Africa | Win | 162* | 66 |
2 | 573 | 2015 | 3612 | 100 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 |
3 | 461 | 2015 | 3615 | 100 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 |
4 | 459 | 2015 | 3610 | 100 | S Dhawan | India | Saf | 137 | 146 |
5 | 453 | 2015 | 3636 | 100 | BRM Taylor | Zimbabwe | Ind | 138 | 110 |
6 | 448 | 2015 | 3623 | 100 | DA Warner | Australia | Afg | 178 | 133 |
7 | 442 | 2015 | 3624 | 100 | KJ Coetzer | Scotland | Bng | 156 | 134 |
8 | 428 | 2015 | 3634 | 100 | Mahmudullah | Bangladesh | Nzl | 128* | 123 |
9 | 397 | 2015 | 3601 | 100 | DA Miller | South Africa | Zim | 138* | 92 |
10 | 389 | 2015 | 3613 | 100 | Shaiman Anwar | U.A.E. | Ire | 106 | 83 |
There was no great batting performance in the quarter-final match. Hence there are no changes to the table, even though there was a higher weight. Quinton de Kock's match-winning 78 secured 340 points and missed the cut comfortably.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | MatchIdx# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 671 | 2015 | 3617 | 100 | MA Starc | Australia | Nzl | 9.0 - 0 - 28 - 6 |
2 | 598 | 2015 | 3607 | 100 | TG Southee | New Zealand | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 7 |
3 | 492 | 2015 | 3617 | 100 | TA Boult | New Zealand | Aus | 10.0 - 3 - 27 - 5 |
4 | 445 | 2015 | 3600 | 100 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 5 |
5 | 429 | 2015 | 3602 | 100 | Sohail Khan | Pakistan | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 55 - 5 |
6 | 356 | 2015 | 3616 | 100 | Imran Tahir | South Africa | Win | 10.0 - 2 - 45 - 5 |
7 | 348 | 2015 | 3640 | 111 | Imran Tahir | South Africa | Slk | 8.2 - 0 - 26 - 4 |
8 | 335 | 2015 | 3620 | 100 | Mohammad Irfan | Pakistan | Zim | 10.0 - 2 - 30 - 4 |
9 | 321 | 2015 | 3621 | 100 | KJ Abbott | South Africa | Ire | 8.0 - 0 - 21 - 4 |
10 | 321 | 2015 | 3608 | 100 | JE Taylor | West Indies | Pak | 7.0 - 1 - 15 - 3 |
The increased weight has helped Imran Tahir to get into the bowling performance analysis in the seventh position with 348 points.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | MatchIdx# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 700 | 2015 | 3612 | 100 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 | 6.0-0-35-2 |
2 | 579 | 2015 | 3615 | 100 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 | 8.0-0-35-2 |
3 | 496 | 2015 | 3600 | 100 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 23 | 20 | 9.0-0-33-5 |
4 | 447 | 2015 | 3620 | 100 | Wahab Riaz | Pakistan | Zim | 54* | 46 | 9.4-1-45-4 |
5 | 434 | 2015 | 3611 | 100 | MM Ali | England | Sco | 128 | 107 | 10.0-0-47-2 |
6 | 403 | 2015 | 3627 | 100 | SC Williams | Zimbabwe | Ire | 96 | 83 | 9.0-0-72-3 |
7 | 363 | 2015 | 3634 | 100 | Shakib Al Hasan | Bangladesh | Nzl | 23 | 18 | 8.5-1-55-4 |
8 | 353 | 2015 | 3608 | 100 | AD Russell | West Indies | Pak | 42* | 13 | 8.0-2-33-3 |
9 | 345 | 2015 | 3638 | 100 | Amjad Javed | U.A.E. | Win | 56 | 99 | 8.0-0-29-2 |
10 | 311 | 2015 | 3614 | 100 | RD Berrington | Scotland | Afg | 25 | 46 | 10.0-0-40-4 |
No real all-round performance in the quarter final match. Hence the table undergoes no change.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | MatchIdx# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 750 | 2015 | 3640 | 111 | South Africa | 134 for 1 in 18.0 | Slk | 133 for 10 in 37.2 |
2 | 721 | 2015 | 3616 | 100 | South Africa | 408 for 5 in 50.0 | Win | 151 for 10 in 33.1 |
3 | 714 | 2015 | 3607 | 100 | New Zealand | 125 for 2 in 12.2 | Eng | 123 for 10 in 33.2 |
4 | 690 | 2015 | 3610 | 100 | India | 307 for 7 in 50.0 | Saf | 177 for 10 in 40.2 |
5 | 688 | 2015 | 3623 | 100 | Australia | 417 for 6 in 50.0 | Afg | 142 for 10 in 37.3 |
6 | 678 | 2015 | 3621 | 100 | South Africa | 411 for 4 in 50.0 | Ire | 210 for 10 in 45.0 |
7 | 669 | 2015 | 3631 | 100 | India | 260 for 2 in 36.5 | Ire | 259 for 10 in 49.0 |
8 | 668 | 2015 | 3635 | 100 | England | 101 for 1 in 18.1 | Afg | 111 for 7 in 36.2 |
9 | 666 | 2015 | 3608 | 100 | West Indies | 310 for 6 in 50.0 | Pak | 160 for 10 in 39.0 |
10 | 664 | 2015 | 3618 | 100 | India | 104 for 1 in 18.5 | Uae | 102 for 10 in 31.3 |
It is very appropriate that the huge win by South Africa over Sri Lanka by 9 wickets and 32 overs to spare, has moved into the top position in the team performance table. Even without the additional weight this performance would have been in the top-10. The additional weight, this being a do-or-die match, helped this win move to the top spot. However, the additional weight does not guarantee top positions. Tomorrow if India defeat Bangladesh by 5 wickets with 2 overs to spare, there is no way that performance will be in the top-10.
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems