The king is 'dead' (11 November 1998)
Last week, I was sure I was not witnessing a Shakespearean tragedy
11-Nov-1998
11 November 1998
The king is 'dead'
By Garth Wattley
Last week, I was sure I was not witnessing a Shakespearean tragedy.
But as day after anxious day rolled by and the plots thickened, I was
not so certain anymore.
On stage, again, was West Indies cricket, cast in the role of
spectacle, the principals-the players and their employers engaged it
seemed in a duel to the death.
But at the end, despite yesterday's "agreement," there seemed to be no
victor. Only victims.
And in the ongoing, sad saga that is currently West Indies cricket,
things are continuing to fall apart.
The rubble has mounted significantly since the London standoff. And
piled high on top is the West Indies Cricket Board.
He may not have realised or admitted it to himself when he signed on
the dotted line at Heathrow airport that fateful Monday. But WICB
president Pat Rousseau has given up lost his moral right to govern.
London was just the site of the demise.
But "Caesar" had been under the knife from long before. The Rousseau
dispensation had already cast itself in the roll of buffoon with its
history of miscalculations and errors.
Sending seven over-aged players to last year's Youth World Cup in
South Africa, followed in February the Sabina Park pitch fiasco was
tragi-comedy.
Then in November, the WICB's appointed officials made a hash of the
Red Stripe Bowl One-day tournament. They could not correctly interpret
their own rules!
The last episode would have been laughable had it been an exception to
the rule. Instead it represented palpable evidence of administrative
decay. Proof of incompetence unchecked. And now this.
The WICB made the biggest mistake of all when it made the issue one of
two men, not 16.
If the West Indies Players Association's version of events is correct
and the word on the ground suggests that is, the board is guilty of
both shortsightedness and rashness.
Narrow-mindedly focussing on Lara, Hooper and their contentious track
records, they were intent on shackling "Mark Anthony" and "Brutus." So
they failed to sense the gathering of the other "conspirators." And
they got killed.
The timing of the standoff could not have been worse for our cricket's
image. And being a man with West Indies cricket at heart as he appears
to be, Rousseau could be excused for being miffed at the episode.
Tact, coolness of thought, not the big stick was needed here. Neat
deflections were required from the WICB captain, not the heave-ho.
President Pat failed to recognise that the groundswell of player
discontent, festering over decades, was fomenting.
Instead his board tried to deal with what was essentially a labour
dispute, as a disciplinary hearing, where conviction came before
trial.
And having played his hand so decisively, he was left with no hole
card once the players, displaying a united front, called his bluff.
The reinstatement of Lara and Hooper, the removal of the fines on the
seven players who took their stand in London should leave the
president with but one alternative.
If such a "misunderstanding" as he put it could last for seven days,
if the Queen's English could fail his executives so miserably, then
they have failed us. They must go. And so, ultimately must he.
At least, so it should be with honourable men. And President Pat is an
honourable man. And while the honours, if you may call it that, now
belong to the Prince's men, responsibility now lies heavy upon them.
The Prince especially.
Incident after incident, indiscretion after indiscretion, has eroded
the public goodwill. And while Lara might justifiably claim noble
intent in this case, perception may be winning the war with reality.
He must be aware of this when he makes the first step onto that Soweto
field.
And when he dons the maroon cap for that first Johannesburg "Test," he
will be mindful of the dangerous endgame in which he is now engaged
with the wounded WICB.
While Caesar lives, the Prince must watch his back. Really he must
watch his wicket. For the most eloquent defence he can make is not by
words of diplomacy, but deeds of the willow.
A player fighting a hard fight for the cricketing discipline of old,
fighting to regain the power of 375, the "Prince" must bat-and-leadroyally.
Then perhaps tragedy may begin again to look like triumph.
Source :: The Trinidad Express (https://www.trinidad.net/express/)