April 14, 1998
One for the selectors
The Jamaica Gleaner
CRICKET: Unless Wes Hall, chairman of the West Indies selection
committee, changes his mind he will not be available next month
for another term on the committee, and unless the West Indies
Cricket Board has second thoughts the other two members of the
present panel will be replaced and the coach removed.
In an effort to stay abreast with the modern game, the Board, it
is said, plans to replace Hall, who last represented the West
Indies in 1969, Joey Carew, who last represented the West Indies
in 1971, and Michael Findlay, who last represented the West
Indies in 1973, with more recent former players, and in an
effort to give the chairman more power, to reduce the number of
actual selectors from five to four.
In the present situation, there are three selectors plus the
captain and the coach with each man having one vote. The plan is
to go back to what it was before the coach was made a selector
in 1996 - back to three elected selectors and the captain with
the chairman having a casting vote in the event of a deadlock.
To many, a new selection committee, regardless of the reason,
would be a good move - especially those who believe that the
present set has not done a good job.
While no one can deny that the selectors decisions at times
deserved to have been questioned, in the final analysis some of
their decisions were commendable and they should be praised for
those - especially for that which saw the return of opening
batsmen Philo Wallace and Clayton Lambert, not one after the
other, but at the same time.
That was a brave decision. The selectors would have been
condemned and ridiculed had Wallace and Lambert failed -
especially if the West Indies had also lost.
As far as cricket fans were concerned, except for those in
Guyana and some in Barbados, neither Wallace nor Lambert were
good enough to represent the West Indies, and on top of that,
Lambert was too old.
Encouraged by captain Brian Lara however, the selectors decided
to select the best team, and with the young players failing to
produce, as far as they were concerned the best team included
Wallace and Lambert who, regardless of Lambert's age and their
past performances for the West Indies, had performed well in the
domestic competition.
It was a great decision - not only because it resulted in some
glorious batting at the start of the West Indies innings, not
only because it inspired those who followed in the order, but
also because it augurs well for the future of West Indies
cricket.
Although the presence of older, experienced players is important
to the development of young players, the emphasis on youth in
the territorial teams in recent years and the failure of the
West Indies selectors to select older players regardless of
performance in regional competitions have discouraged the
participation of older players, and that, in many respects, have
stunted the development of the promising young players who have
been robbed of the opportunity of matching their skills with
experienced players and learning from them.
The selection of Wallace and Lambert therefore was good for West
Indies cricket. It serves as encouragement to those close to or
beyond 30 to continue playing the game.
On top of that, in any endeavour, those who perform should be
rewarded, and although there will be always be a time to groom
young players, although there will always be young players who
promise so much that they cannot be ignored, when it comes to
the highest level of a sport, the best, once they are fit
enough, should always be selected.
The greatness of sport is not only the fulfilment of a young
man's dream but also that of older players - those who say I can
do it, or I can still do it, and succeed in doing it.
No one knows how long Wallace and Lambert will last in the West
Indies team. Next time around, they could, for example, find
Alan Donald and the South African attack too good for them and
may have to give way - especially if the younger batsmen
produce.
What is important however, is that they performed in the
domestic competition, based on that performance, they were given
an opportunity at the higher level, and they destroyed the
opposition in a manner which thrilled the fans and inspired
their colleagues.
The selectors may well have made some mistakes. They also made a
few good moves however. Because of them, cricket fans around the
world are talking not only about fast bowlers Curtley Ambrose
and Courtney Walsh, not only about batsmen Lara, Carl Hooper and
Shivnarine Chanderpaul, but also about young right-arm
legspinner Dinanath Ramnarine, and Wallace and Lambert - two
discards who kept dreaming, stuck to the game, and returned as
stars.
Source :: The Jamaica Gleaner (https://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/)