Decision Review System

Cricket's football

A timeline of events and decisions that has affected the implementation of the Decision Review System (DRS)

ESPNcricinfo staff

June 25, 2012

Comments: 8 | Text size: A | A

Azhar Ali asks for a review and was saved by the replays, England v Pakistan, 2nd Test, Edgbaston, August 7, 2010
There has been a lot of back and forth over the use of the DRS © AFP
Enlarge

June 2008
A decision is made to trial the DRS in the Test series between Sri Lanka and India starting in July 2008.

July-August 2008
Virender Sehwag becomes the first player to be given out after the on-field umpire's decision was overturned by the use of DRS. In three Tests, India make only one successful review; Sri Lanka make 11. The system reveals some glitches in its first experiment and receives mixed reviews.

March 2009
ICC expands the scope of DRS by including Hot Spot as a tool for decision-making, allowing it to be trialled during the second and third Tests between Australia and South Africa.

November 2009
There is serious opposition to DRS after the BCCI decides against using the system for the Tests against Sri Lanka, and other boards begin to complain over the costs borne by the host nation. Instead, they call on the ICC to fund DRS.

October 2010
The ICC says the DRS will be used in the 2011 World Cup. While ball-tracking, it said, would be used for all games, Hot Spot would be available for the semi-finals and final.

February 2011
Hot Spot, it is announced, will not be used for the World Cup as the "supplier advised it was not willing to supply its cameras for the tournament."

February 2011
A controversial moment in the World Cup when Ian Bell is ruled not out, with Billy Bowden sticking to his original decision as a result of the 2.5 metre rule. It triggers a spat between the BCCI and the ICC. The rule is subsequently tweaked to ensure consistency.

May 2011
The BCCI reiterates its opposition to the DRS following a recommendation by an ICC committee to implement the system in all internationals.

June 2011
A compromise is struck when the ICC unanimously agrees to make DRS with Hot Spot - subject to availability - mandatory in all Tests and ODIs, with ball-tracking removed from the compulsory list. The ICC also moots raising a sponsor to fund DRS.

August 2011
The BCCI and Hot Spot reach an agreement to use the technology for India's home season.

September 2011
Hot Spot is criticised by the BCCI after it proves inconclusive on several occasions on India's tour of England. It decides to revisit the agreement reached with the ICC in June.

October 2011
Hot Spot, it is decided, will not be used for India's home ODIs against England. Its owner cites disappointment with performance, and not having the BCCI's support, as the reasons.

October 2011
The DRS is no longer mandatory, says the ICC, leaving it subject to the bilateral agreement between the boards.

February 2012
The ICC decides on testing the effectiveness of the two ball-tracking technologies - Hawk-eye and Virtual Eye - independently at Cambridge University.

June 2012
Following successful testing of DRS technology, the ICC Chief Executives Committee reiterates its commitment to making DRS mandatory in international cricket. The BCCI, however, says its stand remains unchanged.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (June 28, 2012, 2:31 GMT)

There's been a long of talk for/against the DRS from an efficiency perspective...let us not forget the cost that comes with it...I feel its unfair to make it mandatory (even if its efficiency is proved to be 100%) until it also becomes affordable..its equivalent to forcing sum1 to buy a thing they cannot afford..so till the accuracy and cost issues are not sorted out (and I believe both would be in due course) perhaps its best to continue using it on a series-to-series basis for the time being

Posted by TissaPerera on (June 28, 2012, 0:43 GMT)

BCCI says DRS system is not 100% accurate so they don't want to implement. I would advice them to suggest to take out Umpires too because they are not 100% accurate either. :)

Posted by PNikhilReddy on (June 27, 2012, 9:42 GMT)

i have a question, India stand on DRS is subjected to the bilateral agreement between the boards why the series between PAK vs SRI and in ENG vs WI in ODI's are not using DRS? India (BCCI) dont belive in DRS they are opposing it like Englad opposing inclusion of Cricket in Olympics.

Posted by mngc on (June 27, 2012, 1:01 GMT)

India's position defies normal logic. The vast improvement in the quality of decisions is there for all to see. Is there another reason behind backing umpires' decisions that are less accurate?

Posted by   on (June 26, 2012, 18:32 GMT)

DRS - Betterment of the game. 11-1 in against india. Would have been similar in the PAK SL game recently concluded against SL which could have turned the outcome of the game.

Posted by cunaripo on (June 25, 2012, 21:10 GMT)

I think a sponsor should be sourced to use the drs yes so that will rid the issue of who is paying for what so that it can be used in all matches around the cricketing world

Posted by jay_vkjay on (June 25, 2012, 17:31 GMT)

Finally ICC will agree with BCCI as expected.....

Posted by thegaffoor on (June 25, 2012, 16:13 GMT)

Only question is, if all other nations are in supportive of DRS and only if India is opposing. Why can't they solve it democratically. The only question is who is the ruling body of cricket ICC or India..?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days