Champions Trophy 2013 June 12, 2013

Atapattu expects Sri Lanka batsmen to bounce back

18

Marvan Atapattu, Sri Lanka's batting coach, is confident the team would put behind their dismal batting performance against New Zealand in Cardiff and bounce back in the remaining two Champions Trophy group matches against England and Australia.

"True, we had a bad batting innings the other day," Atapattu said. "The spirit was high and the boys were fighting, and we almost got through. But unfortunately, it didn't happen for more than one reason.

"Within the team, everyone wants to win. It's about experience. Given the reputation of some of these guys, they want to win these two games badly. Nobody would like those reputations to be tarnished playing in England, especially."

Sri Lanka meet England at the Oval on June 13 and Australia at the same venue on June 17. They need to win both games to have a chance of qualifying for the semi-finals.

Against New Zealand in Cardiff last Sunday, Sri Lanka's batting collapsed for 138 and they lost by a narrow one-wicket margin. Atapattu, a former captain and top-order batsman, summed up the team's batting performance by saying that the batsmen needed to bring their experience into play in such situations.

"We have the experience, but putting that to work is something. We have spoken about it. [From] time to time, it will happen. Hopefully we will read situations better and think 50-over cricket and bat 300 balls of the innings.

"Looking at the total we got, it wasn't satisfactory. We could have read the situation from the middle. We could have adjusted to settling down to a much lesser target, when you are looking at 230-240 at the fall of the second wicket. Then, the way the wicket behaved and the way we approached it, things went wrong for us."

He regretted the fact that Sri Lanka did not play out their full quota of 50 overs. Atapattu also said that the team had played seven batsmen against New Zealand so that they could set a suitable target but the batting order did not add substantial partnerships.

"That's really disappointing - not batting 50 overs. It's mandatory we use the full quota of 300 balls. Not to have used it is something that we really regret as a group," Atapattu said. "We don't want to go back to the bowlers and expect them to do something. It's up to the batsmen to take on the responsibility and not expect something from the tail. Everybody has been given a role. Our batsmen will not get a flying start every day. But by playing seven batsmen, we have the cushioning of one extra batsman to get to the target we wanted. We needed to have two partnerships going to get to the total we required."

According to Atapattu, the key to succeeding in English conditions was all about spending time in the middle. "It's all about spending a little more time to get into a rhythm. As you go along and as you get a rhythm scoring runs will be a lot easier," he said. "The basic principle of one-day cricket is that you get your best batsmen to bat early in the innings so that you give them ample time and face more balls. But in different conditions, against different oppositions, those options could vary and there are times when you need to be flexible. We are open to it. It is not something where we say, 'No, this is our batting order.'"

Given that context, he said the team had considered pushing some of the younger batsmen up the order but had decided on sticking to a settled batting line-up for this tournament. "It's something that we have spoken about, but that's something that we decided to stick with for this tournament and we don't want that to be a disturbing factor. We would like to see them batting at their positions and doing their best. If they come up trumps the other side of the coin is that the team will do well," he said.

He also admitted that the youngsters in the side needed to be pushed to perform, and it was the job of the coaches and senior players to instill a sense of professionalism in them. "I reckon we, as coaches, become facilitators in front of senior players, and, in the meantime, be pushy with some of these youngsters," Atapattu said. "At one point, they will realise what's good for them and what's not. Our system is such, compared to places like England, Australia or South Africa where you see professionalism setting in very early. For us, it won't happen. We need to understand that and push these youngsters. Sticking to the basics is important to being a good batsman. If you have a good foundation, from there, you can modify your game to reach any level."

The former Sri Lanka captain also said that the amount of cricket played throughout the year didn't allow players adequate time to prepare and practice. "Those days have gone. You get plenty of cricket nowadays; all sorts of formats come in. It won't be ideal, but these guys are professionals compared to our times or 10 years ago. This is where professionalism comes into the equation," he said.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 13, 2013, 10:50 GMT

    Jeevan Mendis is a much better allrounder than Tirimanna . Drop Tirimanna bring Jeevan Mendis.and Sachitra Senanayaka for Shaminda Eranga

  • Wolverine77 on June 13, 2013, 9:06 GMT

    @ Felix1025 - They bash Matthews because he made a big mistake by taking out Malinga when 2 Mcca brothers were at the crease. That allowed them to build up a partnership and get closer to the required score to win. That cost SL the game. When your batters fail you miserably (Not to mention matthews let him down with his poor batting display) you need to keep on attacking. Only reason why Matthews is in the team, because he is the captain. Sooner or later what happened to him with Pune will happen with SL too.

  • on June 13, 2013, 3:13 GMT

    Don't underestimate SL.The way they played in warm up matches and the way they almost defended 137 shows the inner character of the boys.They will easily defeat England today.

  • Felix1025 on June 12, 2013, 19:52 GMT

    Can drop Chandimal (better) or if not Lahiru T and bring back Kule or Sachithra depending on the pitch tomorrow. Can not understand why Ranil Herath and some others criticizing Mathew's captaincy while almost all the commentators praised his tactics trying to defend 139. One mistake though, I would have preferred Eranga bowling that last over instead of Dilshan. Eranga is a wicket taking bowler and pls do not drop him.

  • Herath-UK on June 12, 2013, 19:23 GMT

    Mathew has to justify his place in the team; no runs or wickets in the NZ match. Besides,made some glaring errors as the captain. Let's hope he comes out with a stellar performance for Sri Lanka's sake. Ranil Herath - Kent

  • kevepere on June 12, 2013, 17:35 GMT

    1. Kusal 2. Mahela 3. Sanga 4. Mathews/Chandimal 5. Dilshan 6. Thirimanne 7. Thisara 8. NKule 9. Sachithra/ J Mendis / Eranga (depending on the pitch) 10 Herath 11. Malinga Mathews need to bat well.

  • vallavarayar on June 12, 2013, 17:19 GMT

    Can anybody tell us why Mathews is in the team?

  • Sinhaya on June 12, 2013, 16:16 GMT

    @Jadejafan, you are partly correct but not totally. Yes NZ game was a batting disaster. How can you still play down Thisara Perera who excelled in the IPL? Chandimal has a superb away record. Kushal Perera averages 50 in ODIs in Australia. Yes hope we perform tomorrow. If not it is a bad let down for us. Thanks for your wishes.

  • kahvas on June 12, 2013, 16:06 GMT

    Sri Lanka's best chance was against NZ. Their chances of making it to the semis are slim to none. Unless Sanga, Dilshan or Mahila bat their youngsters have not shown any resilience

  • Sageleaf on June 12, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    Sure SL players can bounce back but important thing is how much as a team they want to win. English conditions could be very harsh to lot of SL players who are playing in England for the first time. But thats no excuse. I think SL players should not wait things to happen but just go play the game to their potential. I'm surprised why SL is not having more spinning option cause English pitches looks very slow in CT. All teams are playing more spinners and SL went with only Rangana Herath. SL has a good side and I'm sure they can be in semi's.

  • on June 13, 2013, 10:50 GMT

    Jeevan Mendis is a much better allrounder than Tirimanna . Drop Tirimanna bring Jeevan Mendis.and Sachitra Senanayaka for Shaminda Eranga

  • Wolverine77 on June 13, 2013, 9:06 GMT

    @ Felix1025 - They bash Matthews because he made a big mistake by taking out Malinga when 2 Mcca brothers were at the crease. That allowed them to build up a partnership and get closer to the required score to win. That cost SL the game. When your batters fail you miserably (Not to mention matthews let him down with his poor batting display) you need to keep on attacking. Only reason why Matthews is in the team, because he is the captain. Sooner or later what happened to him with Pune will happen with SL too.

  • on June 13, 2013, 3:13 GMT

    Don't underestimate SL.The way they played in warm up matches and the way they almost defended 137 shows the inner character of the boys.They will easily defeat England today.

  • Felix1025 on June 12, 2013, 19:52 GMT

    Can drop Chandimal (better) or if not Lahiru T and bring back Kule or Sachithra depending on the pitch tomorrow. Can not understand why Ranil Herath and some others criticizing Mathew's captaincy while almost all the commentators praised his tactics trying to defend 139. One mistake though, I would have preferred Eranga bowling that last over instead of Dilshan. Eranga is a wicket taking bowler and pls do not drop him.

  • Herath-UK on June 12, 2013, 19:23 GMT

    Mathew has to justify his place in the team; no runs or wickets in the NZ match. Besides,made some glaring errors as the captain. Let's hope he comes out with a stellar performance for Sri Lanka's sake. Ranil Herath - Kent

  • kevepere on June 12, 2013, 17:35 GMT

    1. Kusal 2. Mahela 3. Sanga 4. Mathews/Chandimal 5. Dilshan 6. Thirimanne 7. Thisara 8. NKule 9. Sachithra/ J Mendis / Eranga (depending on the pitch) 10 Herath 11. Malinga Mathews need to bat well.

  • vallavarayar on June 12, 2013, 17:19 GMT

    Can anybody tell us why Mathews is in the team?

  • Sinhaya on June 12, 2013, 16:16 GMT

    @Jadejafan, you are partly correct but not totally. Yes NZ game was a batting disaster. How can you still play down Thisara Perera who excelled in the IPL? Chandimal has a superb away record. Kushal Perera averages 50 in ODIs in Australia. Yes hope we perform tomorrow. If not it is a bad let down for us. Thanks for your wishes.

  • kahvas on June 12, 2013, 16:06 GMT

    Sri Lanka's best chance was against NZ. Their chances of making it to the semis are slim to none. Unless Sanga, Dilshan or Mahila bat their youngsters have not shown any resilience

  • Sageleaf on June 12, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    Sure SL players can bounce back but important thing is how much as a team they want to win. English conditions could be very harsh to lot of SL players who are playing in England for the first time. But thats no excuse. I think SL players should not wait things to happen but just go play the game to their potential. I'm surprised why SL is not having more spinning option cause English pitches looks very slow in CT. All teams are playing more spinners and SL went with only Rangana Herath. SL has a good side and I'm sure they can be in semi's.

  • king78787 on June 12, 2013, 15:02 GMT

    Mahela will be the key for ENG vs SL. He has the most one caps for non retired players and has such class that he will not be winkled out by second grade spinners and seamers such as Tredwell, (harsh but if he was so good he would play all the time) and Bopara, Root cannot be a fifth bowler against any of the Sri Lanka top 4. Just the right blend of aggression, improvisation, natural stroke making and patientence so succeed against Eng.

  • on June 12, 2013, 14:49 GMT

    we still depend so much on our big guys. young ones need to perform more to even test the big guy's places in the team. at the moment its all been done by the seniors

  • SL_Boy on June 12, 2013, 14:18 GMT

    it was again Malinga, Sanga and Dilshan ... come on guys time to step up … good luck

  • Jadejafan on June 12, 2013, 11:28 GMT

    I feel bad for the 3 experience players of Sri Lanka having to do all the work. Their youngsters do not look at promising and against England, its too much to ask but good luck!

  • ajithabey on June 12, 2013, 11:09 GMT

    Hopefully SL will get their combination right for this crucial game. My team is Dilshan,Mahela,Sanga,Chandimal,Mathews,Jeevan,Kula,Malinga,Rangana,Sachithra, Eranga as I believe from the matches seen so far you need a good balance in the bowling dept. Good luck SL for a winning performance this time around.

  • CricketMaan on June 12, 2013, 7:16 GMT

    Pak has bowlers no matchwinning batsmen, Ind viceversa, Aus has nothing like they had in the past, SL seems to have patched up thier team, NZ is playing cricket coz not everyone plays Rugby, Windies is just about to break anyday, Bangladesh a perinal underperformer, Zimbabwe hanging there adn SA is seraching for something they never will get. Apart from England what is that other teams are doing?

  • on June 12, 2013, 7:02 GMT

    Perhaps Sri lanka was looking towards scoring around 300 in their game against NZ cause india chased down 330 in the practice game and by doing so they lost their way and got nowhere near as close... against england they should try to adopt a more conservative approach and try to preserve wickets in the first half of the innings..if swann is fit sri lanka will face an even better bowling attack than new zealand and it'll be tough task but if they can win this one..they surely can win against Australia!

  • on June 12, 2013, 6:45 GMT

    Being a die hard fan of SL cricket since i understood the game when i was 7, it is very sad to see the place we are in world cricket at the moment. I have no hopes whatsoever that we will go into the second round. Batting seems average, and no one is stepping up and taking the responsibility. bowling lacks penetration, yes occasionally they do well but nothing great. What has Marvan Atapattu done with the batsman being a coach for so long? Youngsters are not grabbing the opportunities and theirs no one with a notable performance in the bench who can push for a place. Gloomy days!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on June 12, 2013, 6:45 GMT

    Being a die hard fan of SL cricket since i understood the game when i was 7, it is very sad to see the place we are in world cricket at the moment. I have no hopes whatsoever that we will go into the second round. Batting seems average, and no one is stepping up and taking the responsibility. bowling lacks penetration, yes occasionally they do well but nothing great. What has Marvan Atapattu done with the batsman being a coach for so long? Youngsters are not grabbing the opportunities and theirs no one with a notable performance in the bench who can push for a place. Gloomy days!

  • on June 12, 2013, 7:02 GMT

    Perhaps Sri lanka was looking towards scoring around 300 in their game against NZ cause india chased down 330 in the practice game and by doing so they lost their way and got nowhere near as close... against england they should try to adopt a more conservative approach and try to preserve wickets in the first half of the innings..if swann is fit sri lanka will face an even better bowling attack than new zealand and it'll be tough task but if they can win this one..they surely can win against Australia!

  • CricketMaan on June 12, 2013, 7:16 GMT

    Pak has bowlers no matchwinning batsmen, Ind viceversa, Aus has nothing like they had in the past, SL seems to have patched up thier team, NZ is playing cricket coz not everyone plays Rugby, Windies is just about to break anyday, Bangladesh a perinal underperformer, Zimbabwe hanging there adn SA is seraching for something they never will get. Apart from England what is that other teams are doing?

  • ajithabey on June 12, 2013, 11:09 GMT

    Hopefully SL will get their combination right for this crucial game. My team is Dilshan,Mahela,Sanga,Chandimal,Mathews,Jeevan,Kula,Malinga,Rangana,Sachithra, Eranga as I believe from the matches seen so far you need a good balance in the bowling dept. Good luck SL for a winning performance this time around.

  • Jadejafan on June 12, 2013, 11:28 GMT

    I feel bad for the 3 experience players of Sri Lanka having to do all the work. Their youngsters do not look at promising and against England, its too much to ask but good luck!

  • SL_Boy on June 12, 2013, 14:18 GMT

    it was again Malinga, Sanga and Dilshan ... come on guys time to step up … good luck

  • on June 12, 2013, 14:49 GMT

    we still depend so much on our big guys. young ones need to perform more to even test the big guy's places in the team. at the moment its all been done by the seniors

  • king78787 on June 12, 2013, 15:02 GMT

    Mahela will be the key for ENG vs SL. He has the most one caps for non retired players and has such class that he will not be winkled out by second grade spinners and seamers such as Tredwell, (harsh but if he was so good he would play all the time) and Bopara, Root cannot be a fifth bowler against any of the Sri Lanka top 4. Just the right blend of aggression, improvisation, natural stroke making and patientence so succeed against Eng.

  • Sageleaf on June 12, 2013, 15:40 GMT

    Sure SL players can bounce back but important thing is how much as a team they want to win. English conditions could be very harsh to lot of SL players who are playing in England for the first time. But thats no excuse. I think SL players should not wait things to happen but just go play the game to their potential. I'm surprised why SL is not having more spinning option cause English pitches looks very slow in CT. All teams are playing more spinners and SL went with only Rangana Herath. SL has a good side and I'm sure they can be in semi's.

  • kahvas on June 12, 2013, 16:06 GMT

    Sri Lanka's best chance was against NZ. Their chances of making it to the semis are slim to none. Unless Sanga, Dilshan or Mahila bat their youngsters have not shown any resilience