Australia in India 2013-14

India's blunt spearhead

Ishant Sharma has been a disappointment in ODIs, proving ineffective with new ball and old for the majority of his six-year career

Abhishek Purohit

October 17, 2013

Comments: 370 | Text size: A | A

Ishant Sharma in his delivery stride, India v West Indies, Champions Trophy, Group B, The Oval, June 11, 2013
Ishant Sharma has not developed into the bowler he was expected to become © AFP

"I love being the spearhead of the Indian bowling attack," Ishant Sharma had said in August. "It is a privilege for any fast bowler." After the first ODI against Australia four days ago, MS Dhoni said: "As he is part of the side for a long time now, he has to improve his death bowling." Dhoni was referring to Bhuvneshwar Kumar, but one could be forgiven for thinking the India captain had been demanding more from Ishant, the self-acknowledged "spearhead" of his attack.

Bhuvneshwar has taken 25 wickets in 19 ODIs at an average of 25.76 and an economy rate of 4.15, creditable figures for someone who is primarily a new-ball swing bowler. Dhoni is within his rights to ask for improvement with the old ball from Bhuvneshwar, but it must be kept in mind that he has not completed a year in international cricket, and has been the only India seamer to go for less than run a ball in both ODIs against Australia.

Ishant has been playing international cricket for more than six years. In Pune and Jaipur, he went for eight and almost eight per over for a solitary 50th-over wicket. Given the captain's expectations of an inexperienced Bhuvneshwar, you would think he would be setting much higher standards for Ishant, who should qualify as the leader of the attack by the sheer amount of time he's been around. Ishant, however, is falling short.

"Unlucky Ishant" stopped being an excuse a long time ago. Few bowlers are lucky enough to play 51 Tests, and only the luckiest manage to do so averaging 38. A lot has been said in favour of Ishant the Test bowler: that he shouldn't be judged only by his numbers, that he has this rare tireless determination to keep bowling, that his commitment to training is unmatched by fellow fast bowlers in the team. These arguments, arguable at best, don't apply to limited-overs cricket.

Ten overs is all a fast bowler is required to run in for in an ODI. He is expected, chiefly, to pick up wickets with the new ball and prevent the opposition from scoring big at the death. A spearhead might be reasonably expected to lead by example on both counts. Ishant has not. While bowling during the first 15 overs in 67 ODIs, he averages 45.35 for 28 wickets at an economy rate of 5.33. Neither does he get the wickets of specialist batsmen early, nor is he able to keep them quiet. In contrast, Bhuvneshwar has played his new-ball role superbly so far - taking 22 wickets in 19 innings, an average of 21.90 and economy rate of 3.85 in that period.

In the last ten overs, Ishant's economy rate shoots up to 7.38. His bowling average also drops sharply to 24.22 for 31 wickets, which is more than what he manages with the new ball. This suggests that both Ishant's overall wickets tally and average are inflated by cheap dismissals of batsmen looking to have a slog at the death.

"(It is) important we don't give runs with the two new balls and take wickets," Dhoni said. "It is always good to have bowlers who can bowl well at the death also. Especially the three fast bowlers should be able to bowl at the end." Ishant has seldom delivered on either count. For someone who has bowled as much as he has, in excess of 500 overs, only Elton Chigumbura has a worse economy rate. The Zimbabwean at least has his batting to fall back on.

In Pune, after having gone for 45 in 6.1 overs, Ishant had James Faulkner clobbering a wide delivery straight to extra cover in the last over of Australia's innings. He stared hard at the departing No 8 batsman as if he'd earned the dismissal, and proceeded to serve two length balls, one a slower one. No 10 Clint McKay launched both over midwicket. With the new ball, he'd bowled repeatedly short and wide to Aaron Finch, despite the opener's strength square of the wicket, and had been cut for several fours.

In Jaipur, the 45th over of Australia's innings, which went for 17, was a perfect example of how little control Ishant provided to a captain who has partly built his limited-overs reputation on being able to exercise it. Often criticised for his failure to bowl full, Ishant tried doing so. Three balls were full tosses, two of which went for four. Two were wides down the leg side, and he was also fortunate to concede only a single to deep point off a full and wide one. At times, he kept bowling full despite mid-on and mid-off in the circle, and Dhoni had to run up to him in frustration.

In his fledgling career, Bhuvneshwar concedes 8.46 an over in the last ten overs of an ODI, and Dhoni rightly wants him to improve. But with a "spearhead" who is ineffective with the new ball and with the old, and often shows no awareness as an ODI bowler, who can Bhuvneshwar look up to?

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by TheOnlyEmperor on (October 22, 2013, 6:22 GMT)

I request espncricinfo to keep this article open for comments till the end of the ODI series. This is one of the reputed cricket sites, where fans can vent their frustration at the incompetence which they so easily see on the field and which the selectors do not. Indian commentators have long stopped criticizing Indian bowling. In fact they gladly comment on air, techniques which the opposition needs to deploy against Indian bowlers! With BCCI imposing strictures on commentators about commenting on selection, the Indian fans are left with no other forum to get their voice heard. One doesn't have to be a F1 driver, to know which drivers are better than others. Likewise, one doesn't have to be a Test cricket player to figure out competence from incompetence!

Posted by TheOnlyEmperor on (October 22, 2013, 6:15 GMT)

I will not absolve Dhoni of responsibility. He is entrusted to win the match. If the selectors thrust Ishant Sharma into the team, there's nothing that says that he has to give Ishant overs to bowl at the death. He could have given more overs to Yuvraj and Raina, given the way Jadeja was bowling. Agreed, that the lock on the Aussi innings was opened twice, once by Virat when he gave away 18runs and then by Ishant when he gave away 30 runs. I think, Virat, Yuvraj, Raina and Rohit should be made to practice a lot more bowling in the nets. Even if these 4 can chip in 2 overs each, especially when there's a new batsman in at the fall of a wicket, it will make a great difference to the opposition's total being curtailed.

Posted by TheOnlyEmperor on (October 22, 2013, 6:08 GMT)

The Indian selectors are simply amazing. I guess they are taking sole responsibility if India loses all the remaining matches and consequently the number 1 title to Austrailia. Should not then the entire selection committee be sacked for incompetence? I don't understand the logic, morality, sanctity or commonsense in sticking to Ishant Sharma. It does not matter what he does in the nets, when he clearly loses his head while bowling the second spell of 5 overs. I was also disappointed with Vinay Kumar. You cannot bowl a short ball giving away a 6, when the opposition has 9 to win off the last over. I also think Dhoni played it incorrectly by giving the last over to Vinay. IMO he should have given more overs to Yuvraj including the last one... That move would have surprised the batsmen. Ashwin was once again a disappointment, bowling badly in his initial overs, when he should have been keeping the batsmen under more pressure like Jadeja.

Posted by   on (October 20, 2013, 10:08 GMT)

I just don't understand why the selectors are still sticking onto Ishant Sharma.. He has the worst ipl figures(60+ runs in 4 overs) and he is the 2nd Indian bowler to give away 30 runs in an over after Yuvraj(however yuvi's case is very rare and he picks up wickets). If we observe, most of his wickets are only catches....very few are genuinely picked up by him. The selectors should give a chance to young bowlers like Jaydev Unadkat and Mohit Sharma..They are inexperienced but if chances are given to them like how Ishant is getting, they will surely prove to be "Spearheads". I hope Zaheer comes back to the Indian Squad. He showed his efficiency in ipl when he took 4 wickets for RCB...Nowadays even Ashwin has lost his game.His ball doesn't turn much and even if it turns, it is predictable. I think we should give a chance to Amit Mishra also.

Posted by BSWadekar on (October 20, 2013, 7:45 GMT)

Definition of spearhead is the one who could pick up wickets whenever ball is thrown to him. Spearhead could pick up wickets in helpless conditions. Spearhead is never concerned about him being one, instead, he is concerned about picking up wickets in next match. Have you ever heard Dale Steyn calling himself spearhead? No. But the fact is he is spearhead of the attack of whichever team he represents. India's spearhead in test is Pragyan Ojha. He has been picking wickets, if not then helping others pick some by almost drying runs to maidens. As far as limited overs are concerned nobody seems spearhead. It's just bunch of bowlers who finish the quota. Zak we are missing you. Zaheer was true spearhead. One who could pick up wickets of 1-11 no batsman. in any over of match. With whatever ball red or white, new or old. Zak plz come back somehow. I am missing the over in which he bowls five outswingers and then the one that comes in zipping and hitting bell of the offstump.

Posted by Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas_Atheist on (October 20, 2013, 1:33 GMT)

Not only this Sharma, but the other Sharma is a dead-weight too. Players who need to be dropped - Nohit Sharma, Generous Sharma, Pull-less Raina, Domestic Jadeja, Trundler Kumar and may be Yuvraj Singh also. Realise that India is winning in spite of these 6 under-performing players.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tour Results
India v Australia at Bangalore - Nov 2, 2013
India won by 57 runs
India v Australia at Nagpur - Oct 30, 2013
India won by 6 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
India v Australia at Cuttack - Oct 26, 2013
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
India v Australia at Ranchi - Oct 23, 2013
No result
India v Australia at Mohali - Oct 19, 2013
Australia won by 4 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days