July 5, 2009

Mix it up right

This summer, with its blend of Twenty20 and a top-flight Test series, may offer a blueprint for cricket's programme in the years ahead
28

It's a rare English summer when an Ashes series shares top billing with a limited-overs tournament. To discover another year like 2009 you have to go back to 1975, when the first World Cup preceded four Tests between Australia and England.

However, 1975 was different to 2009. First the World Cup was scheduled, and the authorities then decided that as Australia would be in the country, they might as well play a Test series, even though it wasn't an Ashes year. Thirty-four years ago the World Cup with its memorable final probably outshone a lacklustre Test series that provided three draws.

This time around it appears likely Twenty20 and the Ashes will share the spotlight. With cricket currently in a state of flux because of the success of Twenty20, this scheduling rarity may provide a blueprint for the game's future. The international cricket programme is a complete shambles, and there's a feeling that something has to give. The future could well feature a more selective Test programme, a wide range of Twenty20 competitions, including globalisation of the game via franchising, with precious little 50-over cricket. I'd be tempted to predict the death of 50-overs cricket, except that the World Cup is a valuable commodity and the administrators will be loath to let it slide into oblivion.

If Tests and Twenty20 are the main way forward what are the pitfalls?

First, the administrators need to wind back the peripheral entertainment element at Twenty20 matches. It was fine to have dancing girls and players miked up when international Twenty20 was a sideshow, with the odd game supplementing the main fare of Tests and 50-overs contests. However, now that Twenty20 has proved itself a popular and worthwhile form of the game, providing thrilling contests and skilful cricket, the balance has shifted. The game itself provides ample entertainment and the extraneous variety should be kept in its place: before and in between, but not during the matches.

This is more than just acknowledging the game can stand on its own two feet. The administrators have inadvertently devalued Twenty20 and created the thought in the players' minds that it's like a blob of fairy floss to be enjoyed following a substantial meal. The problem with planting that thought in the players' minds is where it could lead.

The administrators have inadvertently devalued Twenty20 and created the thought in the players' minds that it's like a blob of fairy floss to be enjoyed following a substantial meal. The problem with planting that thought in the players' minds is where it could lead

It's easy to manipulate a Twenty20 game. A slight alteration to the batting order here, an unconventional bowling change there, and the occasional wide slipped down the leg side at the appropriate moment and the crooks are satisfied. The unscrupulous player can rationalise his greed with the thought, "I haven't sold out the result."

There have been widespread rumours about the legitimacy of some of the cricket played in the now defunct ICL tournaments. That should alert the administrators to be on the lookout.

There's no doubt any manipulation of the Twenty20 game is heavily dependent on a corrupt captain. With the explosion in spread betting, the crooks could probably survive purely on having the captain in their pocket, although their greed generally knows no bounds. Cricket needs the captains to be in step with its crime-stoppers, not in league with the gangsters. It's important the public are sure it's always innovative captaincy on view, rather than an occasional greedy gamble.

Cricket has progressed in a haphazard vein for too long now and while there's much to commend there's also plenty to lament. Now is the right time for the administrators to start planning assiduously for the future. A future involving Test cricket played by just the major nations and including a world championship, plus a variety of Twenty20 competitions that globalise the game through franchises, is a manageable format.

There's no doubt this year's World Twenty20 was a resounding success, and the upcoming Ashes series promises to be a tight contest. This is a mix of cricketing entertainment that keeps everyone happy - the players, the fans and the bean counters. However, unlike 1975, where cricket fortuitously stubbed its toe on a large gold nugget, the way forward needs to be structured. If the administrators don't plan wisely, they may find that in the near future they are only nominally in charge of the game.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • kantipur on July 7, 2009, 9:53 GMT

    I agree with Ian. It is easier to fix in 20-20. A batsman can delibrately get out playing an unorthodox shot . Public will not question the shot calling an unorthodox shots are norm of 20-20.

    20-20 is more of a hit and miss cricket even though it is popular and greater tv viewers. But I believe an average cricket fan cares about result in test more. They tend to remember test matches for longer time. With so much 20-20 going on I don't think people even remember many of the results.

    Ian also draws an interesting point about scheduling of the games. Whats more pathetic is how ICC has demean the global event like world cup. Look at this First they played 20-20 world cup, again in the same year all the teams come again for champions trophy, earlier half of next year there is another 20-20 world cup, immidiately after that within one year there is again 50 overs world.

  • aswam on July 7, 2009, 1:50 GMT

    I agree with anmn. Why so much hype for Ashes? Neither England nor Australia are strong teams currently and a test series between them is almost boring.. We cant watch a test series just for its history, can we? "Ashes is sharing the limelight with T20" - Limelight from who? The whole world? Thats unacceptable.

  • pappu_saala on July 7, 2009, 0:13 GMT

    Interesting thoughts, but don't see the point discussing it. ICC decides rules not based on public opinion.

    For shaitaan and paullie http://static.cricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/70500/70583.jpg

  • Trish.Tripp on July 6, 2009, 17:56 GMT

    for those of you who were disappointed just like me ... here's the bikini girl :-) http://www.cricinfo.com/cbs/content/image/275855.html

  • mani86 on July 6, 2009, 16:16 GMT

    i agree, the most interesting thing about this article is the very misleading picture of a cheerleader on the main page. im sure i have seen the same picture on cricinfo before. is this some sort of a lure i wonder!

  • malepas on July 6, 2009, 13:25 GMT

    This is cheating, gosh, what a shock to find out after clicking on sexy,beatuful bra stripped girl's pictures that all you gonna get is 70's black & white oldies playing cricket --- I think that should also sums up what people want now-s-days, a good cricket match which is fast moving,thrilling and entertaining.

  • Shahzad_Tirmizi on July 6, 2009, 8:59 GMT

    Well Ian I'm not sure if you read viewer's comments but I want to know your opinion about; Don't you think ODIs should be replaced by T20 & keep test cricket in its real form?

  • Shaitaan on July 6, 2009, 4:48 GMT

    I'm with Paullie... about the bikini girl, I mean. Why would one click into an Ian Chappel article on a Monday morning otherwise, for gosh sakes. A nondescript black and white picture of 1975 cricket? Yawn!

  • kirkeet-fan on July 6, 2009, 4:26 GMT

    how about removing all the restriction on the bowling regarding the bouncers and the elbow-bending for the slower bowlers and letting the visiting captain the choice to bowl or bat... I think this makes the game a lot more fair between the bat and the ball if the local team wants to prepare the pitch to their advantage, that advantage is negated by offering the visiting captain the first use of the pitch, I think I'd stop watching test cricket, which by the way is still the only cricket I watch, if I see the home team prepare pitches to suit their bowlers and conditions and then have talented visiting teams come in but basically toil for nothing as the conditions and rules are so heavily favored to the local team

  • chinaman_swinger on July 6, 2009, 3:10 GMT

    T20s are no more like the ones introduced four years ago. They have changed a lot, particularly in the intensity & range of competition. Test matches are however a tradition and they should be played as a tradition, with responsibility & lots of intensity. ICC should really think of saving cricket matches from the rain gods.

  • No featured comments at the moment.