A rather misleading series scoreline
A 2-0 defeat for West Indies has not significantly improved their reputation but the result conceals a substantial improvement reflected in sharper fielding, improved running between wickets and more committed lower-order batting, writes Peter
Not even a surprising decision by a third umpire prepared to ignore the evidence provided by Hot Spot, and so the review system, could take the gloss off a superb chase by the West Indies or a deserved victory by Australia. The West Indians can be proud of their performance. In times past they were granted five-match series but their stocks have fallen and they stand near the bottom of the rankings.
For years they played with arrogance and a sense of entitlement to victory and all the privileges that go with it. But now they have lost their invincibility, opponents loudly question their credentials. Clearly, this irks those accustomed to constant success and, as was the case here, frustrations abound and raw emotions are exposed. Furthermore, few members of this team feel secure and therefore are fractious and vulnerable.
In South Australia a young female photographer asked him if he could sit with his knees together while she took the team's picture. "I'd love to," he said, "but I can't." She is still blushing.
Kanishkaa Balachandran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo