Bad call by captain Adams (10 February 1999)
In the past 20 years or so, cricket has changed in many ways
10-Feb-1999
10 February 1999
Bad call by captain Adams
Tony Becca
In the past 20 years or so, cricket has changed in many ways. Test
cricket for example, is to many, no longer the attraction it used to
be, the limited-over version has taken over, and where the game was
once lily-white as far as clothing is concerned, coloured clothing for
limited-over matches and sponsors logos for Test matches are now the
order of the day.
Add to that the incessant chatting and shouting on the field, the
pressure on umpires caused by appeals for catches not taken, for
catches when the ball went no where near the bat, the dissent when
batsmen are given out, and the many stoppages for a drink of water,
and cricket is really not what cricket used to be.
In days gone by, for example, the batting order reflected the skill
and the ability of batsmen. In those days specialists opened the
innings, followed by the top batsmen at number three, number four and
number five.
Today, especially in the West Indies, it is not surprising to see
batsmen of little skill, or players selected as bowlers, appearing up
the order - some times to protect the top batsman.
And the same thing happens in the field, where, instead of the team's
top bowlers, part-time bowlers are often in action at crucial stages
of an innings. Sometimes also, as happened in the fifth one-day
international in South Africa when Rawl Lewis did not even bowl one
ball, and at Sabina Park in the second innings of the Busta Cup match
between Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago when Laurie Williams did not
even bowl a ball, a player who has been selected as a bowler may not
even be called on.
Remembering that the batting order and bowling changes, like the
setting of the field, is the responsibility of the captain. Captains
have contributed to cricket not being what cricket used to be - and
numbered among them must now be Jamaica's own James Adams. Adams not
only failed to use Williams, one of his two best bowlers, in the
second innings at Sabina Park when Jamaica left Trinidad and Tobago a
victory target of 137, he not only delayed the introduction of
Nehemiah Perry - one of this two best bowlers, but on Friday, the
opening day of the Busta Cup match against the Windward Islands at
Alpart, Adams sent Matthew Sinclair to bat as night watchman with the
score on 19 for two, with less than two overs to go, and with the
bowlers on top.
The use of a night watchman is traditional in cricket, and although
many are against it, there is good reason for it.
The use of Sinclair on Friday, however, was not only surprising, it
was also disappointing. Adams should have sent in an experienced
player, he should have sent in either Brian Murphy or Williams. In
fact, he should have sent in anyone but Sinclair.
Sinclair, despite being the wicketkeeper, is a batsman in his own
right, Williams and Murphy have been disappointing as batsmen, and the
youngster, who was behind the wicket for 78 overs, should not have
been sacrificed for either of them.
In the good old days when cricket was cricket, no captain would have
sent a newcomer to bat as a night watchman - certainly not a teenaged
newcomer who prides himself as a batsman.
Source :: The Jamaica Gleaner (https://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/)