Canty furious with NZ management (11 December 1998)
Canterbury cricket's selection chief Brian McKechnie is furious at the national body for refusing to release the province's New Zealand players for Sunday's big-money Max semi-final match against Central Districts
11-Dec-1998
11 December 1998
Canty furious with NZ management
The Christchurch Press
Canterbury cricket's selection chief Brian McKechnie is furious at the
national body for refusing to release the province's New Zealand
players for Sunday's big-money Max semi-final match against Central
Districts.
Although the first test against India does not start until Friday in
Dunedin, New Zealand Cricket has rejected an appeal from Canterbury to
have the five players available.
National coach Steve Rixon wants the team to assemble on Saturday
before travelling to Dunedin on Sunday for the first of five practice
days, including a two-day match, before the five-day test.
"Canterbury has copped the short end of the straw again with New
Zealand Cricket. We haven't won many battles against them in my
time,"said McKechnie yesterday.
McKechnie felt it was not unreasonable for Canterbury's Black Caps to
play for their province on Sunday afternoon against Central Districts
and fly to Dunedin that night.
"For the sake of one practice I can't understand their attitude. They
want Cricket Max to have a high profile, but won't allow the best
players to take part."
McKechnie said the decision would be a "smack in the eye" for promoter
Sky Television which is providing substantial prizemoney for the event
and seeking the best possible players to attract viewers.
"How much practice do New Zealand want? They will be knackered by the
time the game starts. How much time does Rixon need with them
beforehand?"
In the first semi-final tonight between Auckland and Wellington,
Auckland has national team all-rounder Dion Nash available before the
Black Caps gather in Christchurch for outfitting and other
housekeeping matters tomorrow.
NZC operations manager John Reid said the Black Caps management had
requested a longer lead-in time to the test match series at a debrief
and this had been approved. "It's a matter of priorities. We want the
test team to be as well prepared as possible."
Reid said he could understand Canterbury's concerns and argument, but
a decision had been made and would not be changed.
"We want Max to have a high profile and be successful, but in this
case we have decided The Management request should be supported."
McKechnie said while he understood others were aware of an earlier
team assembly, Canterbury's selectors only learnt earlier this week
that the players, including Chris Cairns, Stephen Fleming, Nathan
Astle, and Craig McMillan would be out.
"If we had known this beforehand we might have thrown one or two of
our games, so we came second or third and played on the Friday night,
" said McKechnie. Canterbury was the top qualifier.
Ironically, Canterbury, as top qualifier, was scheduled to have its
match against fourth-placed Central Districts on Friday night, but a
change was forced when Wellington finished second. Wellington could
not play on Sunday because it is involved in a first-class match
against India.
"We have taken the game more seriously this season and planned
accordingly and this is what happens," said McKechnie.
Canterbury always knew it would be without its top players if it
qualified for the December 18 final. That date clashes with the
opening day of the test.
McKechnie said the difference between playing for first and second and
being a losing semi-finalist was substantial.
The winner receives $25,000 and the runner-up $12,500 while third gets
$7,500, and fourth $5,000.
"If they had to assemble earlier, why couldn't they have played a
double-header on the Friday or the other semi on the Saturday?,"
queried McKechnie.
McKechnie said despite the decision he still felt Canterbury had the
team to be successful against Central Districts.
Source :: The Christchurch Press (https://www.press.co.nz/)