England must unearth players of character (17 December 1998)
THE truism that there are no easy matches in Australia will be forcibly brought home to a crestfallen but not yet demoralised England team over the next few days
17-Dec-1998
17 December 1998
England must unearth players of character
By Christopher Martin-Jenkins
THE truism that there are no easy matches in Australia will be
forcibly brought home to a crestfallen but not yet demoralised
England team over the next few days. No gentle Christmas respite
for them, but two demanding matches, starting with the one-day
game in Canberra today against a team mainly consisting of young
thrusters eager to catch the eye of their captain, Mark Taylor.
Next comes the four-day match in Hobart against what would be an
Australian 2nd XI if it were not missing Shane Warne and Jason
Gillespie. It is, in effect, a sixth Test match, which will keep
English eyes on the ball but also make demands to which they may
not be equal unless they sharpen up their Adelaide form.
Since the one real advance which England have made to date is the
successful start made by Alex Tudor, great care has to be taken
to use him wisely in the games which remain. He is sure to play
at Melbourne unless he has a disaster at Hobart and the selectors
were wise, surely, to leave him out of the limited-overs match
today from which he had more to lose than to gain.
With two Tests to go and a minimum of 10 one-day internationals
in the new year this is not the best time for inquisitions or
revolutions - there is no disgrace in losing to a better team -
but it does have to be asked why, despite so much hard work, the
collapses and dropped catches have continued. It was obvious from
the start of the tour that England would have to play above
themselves in all departments if they were to succeed in a land
where, after all, they have only regained the Ashes four times in
106 years. They needed to win tosses, make good starts against
the new ball, build big first-innings scores, score significant
runs in the second half of the order, catch half-chances, keep
the bowlers fit and bowl tightly. In the event, only the last two
of those essentials has been realised. It has not been remotely
enough against the best team in the world.
England have been outplayed by a stronger team, with the emphasis
on team. It is Taylor's view that the difference lies more in
talent than in moral strength, but it is obvious how a run of
success on Australia's part has built the environment into which
a journeyman cricketer like Colin Miller can thrive and excel,
whereas the lack of confidence in the England team has prevented
talented individuals from expressing themselves.
Like Australia when Bobby Simpson took over as coach in 1986,
England's only hope is to back cricketers possessed of the
necessary talent, character and dedication. Simpson and his
co-selectors at that time rejected the immensly-gifted David
Hookes because, as Simpson expressed it in his revealing book The
Reasons Why, "his publicity outstripped his ability as a batsman
and because of this he lost the opportunity to develop fully."
Simpson has related how, having identified a group of players of
the necessary calibre and drive - Ian Healy being one they were
soon to promote - they also determined to play the game a certain
way: "mentally aggressive, busy, positive and energetic cricket
had always done Australia proud in the past. So we asked the
players to re-create these qualities. We said to them, 'this is
the way we think we can play best if we are going to make an
impact in the future. We will stick with you as long as we can,
provided you back this philosophy."'
Graham Gooch and David Lloyd are saying the same things in the
England camp now. There is a necessary work ethic and an
impressive system of support for the players, but, as Gooch
remarked yesterday in Canberra, "you don't suddenly get
hard-nosed international cricketers."
It has taken Mark Ramprakash and Nasser Hussain a long time to
develop that carapace which has enabled them to make the most of
their ability even when the going is really tough.
If John Crawley and Graeme Hick cannot do it in the matches which
remain, others will have to earn and then take the chance.
Selectors have to look beyond the averages, seeking batsmen and
bowlers of sound technique and genuine achievement who have shown
that they respond to a big occasion and a tough situation.
There is a need, still, for a stronger moral lead for the England
team: heavy drinking has been frowned upon and philandering
should be too.
The get-together in the Lake District for the England A and
under-19 teams last October, designed to build confidence, team
skills and a sense of shared values, pointed the way towards
gradual improvement.
It is bound to be gradual, sad to say, but the attempts to water
the grass roots, and to reorganise the creation and logical
development of promising young cricketers have accelerated since
Lord MacLaurin put his drive and initiative behind the ECB.
The new crystal glass replica of the Ashes is on the way out of
England. It is time Australia got tangible reward for their
superiority and by rights they should get the Ashes themslves
too. But, as Gooch said on his way to a reception at the prime
minister's lodge last night: "We've got to prove to Australians
that we can play cricket and win. We've got four games to turn it
round."
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)