Australia v India, Commonwealth Bank Series, Adelaide

Rohit has earned right to current one-day XI

If the idea of rotating players is to keep Rohit Sharma away from pressure, singling him out as the reason behind India's openers' rotation policy will only do the contrary

Sidharth Monga in Adelaide

February 11, 2012

Comments: 66 | Text size: A | A

Rohit Sharma made 95 off 100 balls, India v West Indies, 3rd ODI, Ahmedabad, December 5, 2011
All of a sudden India seem to be having to rest legends just to accommodate Rohit Sharma © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Suresh Raina | Rohit Sharma
Series/Tournaments: Commonwealth Bank Series
Teams: India

Two days after Virender Sehwag was left out of the Melbourne ODI, he let a cat out of the bag. When asked why he wasn't played in Melbourne, Sehwag said, "We are giving breaks to top-three batsmen. Maybe tomorrow is somebody else's turn. Either Gautam [Gambhir] or [Sachin] Tendulkar will have a break, and maybe I can play."

The next day, Gambhir was rested, and Sehwag played against Sri Lanka in Perth. In a press conference at the end of the game, MS Dhoni reiterated the rotation policy for the openers. Which, going by the way the captain and a senior player had spoken, suggested Tendulkar would be the next to rest. Now you don't ask Tendulkar to sit out. So the anticipation rose for the press conference before the match against Australia, in Adelaide.

On the day before the match, true to form on this tour, the Indian team sent out R Ashwin to handle another tough press conference. Poor Ashwin's response was to say he was not part of any selectorial decisions. He couldn't have said much more. He was not asked any other questions. The team spokesperson then clarified that the rotation policy was not set in stone, and that the first purpose of the side was to qualify for the finals.

That should put the rotation policy to rest, but it doesn't take away from the ridiculous reason given out for the system in the first place. The captain of the side, Dhoni, had this to say after the second ODI: "We are looking to give Rohit [Sharma] as many games as possible, and we can afford to do that in the first leg of the tournament." He went on to talk about how dropping or, to use a term in vogue, resting Rohit would put extra pressure on him, and that he should not be judged on a short sample.

Rohit should be so grateful for this favour. However, unless the captain has not watched matches that he himself has not played in, he will do well to know that Rohit has been Man of the Series in both of the last two ODI series he has played. Dhoni had been rested for both those series, in the West Indies and against the same opponents at home. During that period, Rohit won India three matches from the brink, and fell just short of another. All of a sudden, though, the team seems to be having to rest legends just to accommodate Rohit.

If the idea of rotating players is to keep Rohit away from pressure, singling out just him will only do the contrary for a batsman who has been made to believe through the summer that he is not good enough to get into a Test side that has been whitewashed twice. Especially when there is another batsman in the middle order who has managed to stay under the radar. Suresh Raina always gives his best on the field, which makes captains like him. He is also the man who seems to be officially given the charge of keeping the team's spirits up when on the field. He does that job well. He also brings value to the side with his part-time offspin. He was even made the captain of the ODI side when India toured the West Indies.

As a batsman, though, Raina doesn't seem to have evolved from the one first seen as an attractive stroke-maker. The same mistakes keep repeating themselves, most grating being the pull shot that more often than not lobs up in the air. To be fair to him, Raina often gets to bat too late in the innings, and has to go for his shots.

Starting with the West Indies tour last year, though, Raina has been anything but a finisher. He kept getting out irresponsibly in the West Indies, and here in Perth, especially when he knew Virat Kohli, the non-striker, had hurt himself during the chase, Raina played that limp pull shot again. At that time neither was the asking-rate was out of control nor were India running out of time. He believes it's only people's perception that he has trouble with the short ball. He possibly felt the need to challenge that "perception" by trying to get on top of the bouncer. He is not managing that at the moment.

If India feel playing Tendulkar, Sehwag and Gambhir is the way to go ahead and realise their first aim, which is to make the finals, that is what they should do. If they feel resting one of them from each game is the way to go, they should not say it is being done for Rohit's sake because with his performance in the ODIs last year he has earned the right to be in the first-choice one-day XI at least for the first few games.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Tendulkars_Tennis_Elbow on (February 14, 2012, 8:51 GMT)

Why does ashwin get sent out to do press conferences? He is certainly the most articulate and educated of the whole lot, but how can he answer questions about decisions he wasnt a part of. rank escapism this.

Posted by Bazingaaaaaaaaaa on (February 12, 2012, 10:29 GMT)

So what has irfan pathan not done to earn his rights... or that we have to wait for another agarkar clone in vinay kumar to end his career in next 15 years before pathan is considered... what is it that the world does not know about irfan that keeps him out of the team?

Posted by Mayan005 on (February 12, 2012, 9:24 GMT)

Hmm..So, doing well against the worst (test playing) team in the world makes him an automatic selection? Brilliant writing..

Posted by CricKrieg on (February 12, 2012, 9:20 GMT)

Rohit Sharma is not a regular fixture in this indian side because he is not a team player. He lives to "rescue" the team from lost positions. That's the only cricket he wishes to play, and he somehow has a knack of making those positions arise by sabotaging the team so that they are dependent on him. He does this by scoring slowly whenever he arrives, letting the required run rate mount and his partners get out trying to take on the burden.

Don't believe me? I have statistical evidence showing Rohit Sharma's performances to be inversely proportional to the team's chances.

Posted by Shibananda on (February 12, 2012, 8:54 GMT)

why not we play Rohit Sharma at no.5, he seems to be comfortable in batting at this position and stats shows that he has best batting averages while batting at no. 5...

Posted by thinktank1 on (February 12, 2012, 8:17 GMT)

Rohit should be permanent in Indian lineup.. remember T20 WC 2007 ?? If not for Rohit, no way India could have won against SA and Pak.. and CB series.. T20 WC and CB series win brought India so much confidence. He is class.

Posted by ZedInLosAngles on (February 12, 2012, 7:38 GMT)

This article's title is MONTHS late. Rohit his right months back. And not just in ODI, but test also.

Posted by myStraightTalk on (February 12, 2012, 4:02 GMT)

Also why not pick IShant Sharma and right an article :) He also have earned right to damage the current loosing team.

Posted by Iyer on (February 12, 2012, 3:15 GMT)

I don't agree with the author. He has the typcial indian mindset. Nobody should take their place granted bei t rohit or sachin or raina. Only the best of the lot should be played. So nobody has earned a place based on performance in India or elsewhere. Only those who are capable of playing in australian conditions against the opponent should find a place.

Posted by Alexk400 on (February 12, 2012, 2:53 GMT)

I will rest Sehwag whole series and next 3 series. SImple as that. I am hardcore sehwag fan. But i am appaled with his stroke selection when his team needs him to control and play few overs initially. He always thinks others can do that job , his job hit out. Yes it is true when others playing well. When others not performing well you may have to play others role of playing as many ball. I think sehwag do not have patience. He needs to be dropped. Simple as that. This is coming from sehwag fan not sachin fan. I don't like sachin but i want sachin play and get his 100 and go away from us. His misery affecting the team morale. But i doubt sachin can score century in australia. I don't mind sachin failing but he is the one world wants to see more , so he should play. Gambhir should not allowed to play. Some other youngster should open with sachin or sehwag if he play. Sachin never abide by team rules. He is selfish and has bombay lobby supporting him. he is elephant in the room.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tournament Results
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 8, 2012
Australia won by 16 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Mar 6, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 8 wickets (with 34 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Brisbane - Mar 4, 2012
Australia won by 15 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Mar 2, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 9 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Feb 28, 2012
India won by 7 wickets (with 80 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days