March 4, 2009

It takes two, baby

Six of the highest 13 partnerships in Test cricket have come in the last six-odd years; the last three months alone have produced six remarkable stands
35


Lara's 153 is widely acknowledged as the greatest match-winning innings of modern times, but he couldn't have done it without Courtney Walsh © Getty Images
 

Batting partnerships are a lot like love affairs. As Marvin Gaye and Kim Weston so eloquently put it, it takes two, baby. In both cases, the lasting ones can inspire and transform, even challenge our notions of possibility. For all that we laud those who carry their bat or supply 60% of the runs, one batsman can never save or win a match entirely on his own. Besides, is any sporting act quite so life-affirming as the last-wicket alliance that turns impending defeat into improbable victory or honourable draw?

The present and extremely recent past certainly have plenty to brag about. Over the past three years, three of the Test records for the top four wickets have fallen (six of the tallest 13 stands, in fact, have been recorded since the start of 2003, including the first in professional annals to scale the giddy heights of 600). The past three months alone, moreover, have produced an extraordinary array of dangerous liaisons.

In Karachi, Mahela Jayawardene and Thilan Samaraweera erased Peter May and Colin Cowdrey's 52-year-old Test record for the fourth wicket. In Perth, AB de Villiers and JP Duminy put on 111 for the fifth, steering South Africa to the second-highest successful chase in five-day annals. In the very next Test, in Melbourne, Duminy and Dale Steyn added 180, just 16 shy of a fresh peak for the ninth wicket. In Antigua, West Indies' final pair, Fidel Edwards and Daren Powell, denied England by surviving the last 10 overs. In Johannesburg, another debutant, Marcus North, added 117 with Mitchell Johnson for the eighth wicket against the game's mightiest pace attack, paving the way, ultimately, to a victory predicted by few outside the tourists' dressing room. In Lahore this week, Samaraweera even managed to co-author consecutive 200-run stands in the same innings.

For all the indelibility of the really big numbers (Sangakkara and Jayawardene's 624, Jayasuriya and Mahanama's 576, Laxman and Dravid's 376) and the legendary ones (Watson and Bailey's 163, Hirst and Rhodes' 15), assessments of worth are about far more than mere number-crunching. That Edwards-Powell duet, after all, weighed in at just 17 runs. No less marvellous was that last-ditch Robert Croft-Angus Fraser double-act against South Africa at Old Trafford in 1998, which yielded all of two runs, yet managed, over the course of 5.1 overs, three of them hurled down by Allan Donald, to ensure just the second draw-with-the-scores-level in Test history, keeping the tourists' series lead at 1-0. Duly emboldened, England took the next two matches to gain their first triumph in a five-Test rubber for more than a decade. Then there was the Alan Knott-Jeff Jones Show in Georgetown in 1968, which did not even trouble the scorers. A devout No. 11, Jones withstood the entire final over, bowled by Lance Gibbs, the planet's premier spinner; the day was saved and the series was England's.

Context is everything. No partnership, for instance, raises the hairs on the back of the neck quite so efficiently as the one between Bert Sutcliffe and Bob Blair in Johannesburg 54 Boxing Days ago. Sutcliffe had retired hurt after being skulled by Neil Adcock; by the time New Zealand's ninth wicket fell his head was swathed in bandages, his torso festooned with bruises, the follow-on heroically saved, innings over. Blair, after all, was not due to come in at all. That morning he had learned that his fiancée had died in a train crash back home, a national disaster that cost 150 other lives. Yet not only did Blair go back on his apparent decision to withdraw from the contest, he helped Sutcliffe add 33 in 10 minutes of joyous mayhem. The impact on the match was less than negligible - it was lost by 132 runs - but the memory endures even for those who never saw it.

Then there are those partnerships whose value and stature are severely undermined by what happened next. But for a hotly debated caught-behind, Brett Lee and Michael Kasprowicz might well have pulled off the not inconsiderable feat of concluding the 2005 Edgbaston Test with a stand of 62, the highest ever last-wicket liaison to win a Test; instead, they fell three short. In Durban, in a match that began 70 years ago this week, Paul Gibb and Bill Edrich came together with England, set the small matter of 696, on 78 for 1. Gibb was playing in his debut series; Edrich's first-innings single had left his Test CV reading 88 runs in 11 knocks - highest score 28. Undaunted, the pair added 280, Edrich went on to 219, and England were only 42 short with five wickets intact when the tourists were forced to hurry away to catch the boat home.

Nominating Test cricket's most stirring partnerships, then, is as fiendishly ticklish a proposition as it is subjective. Here, nonetheless, in ascending order, is your starter for 10. Given the timeless allure of the tail-end rally, orchestrated as it invariably is by at least one partner with few if any pretensions towards professional batsmanship, timing takes precedence over volume.


Inzamam seals the deal with four leg-byes, in Karachi, 1994 © Getty Images
 

5) Inzamam-ul-Haq and Mushtaq Ahmed, Karachi 1994
But for the suspicions aroused in hindsight - it was the dawn, after all, of the match-fixing era, and too many of the combatants here would be tarred with that wayward brush - this would have come higher. What cannot be disputed is that the 57 Pakistan's last pair put on remains the largest 10th-wicket stand to win a Test. Entire teams have been dismissed for less.

When Shane Warne sent back Waqar Younis, his fifth victim of the innings, to leave the hosts on 258 for 9, Mushtaq joined Inzamam with the Australians convinced, not unnaturally, that the fat lady was clearing her throat and counting her chickens. Instead, the duo repelled everything Warne buzzed at them and took due toll of an otherwise largely unassuming attack (featuring Jo Angel, Tim May, a pair of Waughs and a green Glenn McGrath). They knocked off the needful in just 42 minutes, Mushie's unbeaten 20 off 30 balls his highest score in 22 Test innings to date. "God is great," chanted the crowd. How easily, though, might the result have gone the other way.

Greg Baum's report in the Melbourne Age captured the tingling drama of the final ball: "With three needed, Inzamam stepped out to Warne, only for the ball to take a fine deflection from his front pad and run away past wicketkeeper Ian Healy to the boundary rope. Warne appealed for lbw, but umpire Dickie Bird was already signalling four leg-byes…" Inzy hoisted his arms in triumph - he would later state that it felt even better than playing the innings that won the 1992 World Cup; Healy took his wrath out on the stumps. Nobody, happily, blamed him for the alleged missed stumping, so low did the ball scuttle through (Inzy had expected it to bowl him).

4) Don Bradman and Jack Fingleton, Melbourne 1937
Every year I force-feed my cricket-resistant students this deliciously multi-dimensional slab of history, comfortably the most durable record partnership in Tests. Not because, 72 years on, it remains, at 346, the highest for the sixth wicket, nor even because it launched the greatest fightback in five-day history, but because it came as a direct consequence of one of the most daring ploys in the history of international sport.

By the time a sticky, prickly pitch had done its worst, it had seen off 23 batsmen for 373 runs, yet prompted two declarations, so keen were the captains to subject the opposing order to its treacheries. Bradman, though, had a cunning plan for Australia's second innings: send the bowlers in first. Sure, by the time he entered the fray himself, he'd sacrificed five wickets for 97, the lead a tenuous 221, but conditions had eased appreciably. The Don, though, was in mortal form, having recorded ducks in each of the first two Tests, both lost heavily. Dissent and dissatisfaction over his leadership, meanwhile, were growing at an alarming rate. He was also suffering from a nasty chill.

"Everything depended on Bradman," reckoned Neville Cardus, "and he knew it." A shower came and went, then another; the umpires "wandered to and from the pavilion's direction like people lost in the Hampton Court maze". When the skies dried, England's bowlers, hampered by sawdust and a sopping ball, lost their grip "on a rich couch stuffed with runs". Fingleton made 136 but Bradman, as was his wont, hogged the scoring on his way to 270: the (then) best for Australia in a home Ashes encounter and still the biggest second-innings stint in the urn's history as well as the highest by any Test No. 7. So bent was he on breaking English spirits, even when he was ninth out, the lead 670, he declined to declare.

"Chuck" Fleetwood-Smith and Bill O'Reilly spun Gubby Allen's men out for 323, the next two Tests were won, too, and the only instance of a side winning a series from two-down was complete. But for Bradman's typically ingenious snook at convention, the revival might have been stillborn.

3) Ken Mackay and Lindsay Kline, Adelaide 1961
Napoleon had his 100 days, Kline his 100 minutes. On the final morning Australia's No. 11, scorer of 43 runs in his previous 15 visitations to a Test crease, had a net against the less than intimidating duo of Johnny Martin and Norm O'Neill. They got him out 11 times. When he went in to bat that afternoon, with 100 minutes left, victory out of sight and defeat all but assured, the attack confronting him featured the contrasting might and flight of Wes Hall, Lance Gibbs, Sonny Ramadhin and Alf Valentine.


Dilley gives it some humpty inspired by Botham at the other end, at Headingley in 1981 © Getty Images
 

Richie Benaud was about to have "a leisurely shower" when Kline spotted him en route to the middle, and asked what he should do. "Oh, why don't you just stick around," replied his captain, more in solidarity than hope, much less expectation. By the time he was dressed, Kline's alliance with "Slasher" Mackay, the era's best-known back-to-the-wall grafter, was still in its infancy. Over the remainder of the innings, Benaud recalled lighting 16 cigarettes.

Kline continued, somehow, to cling on. Even when West Indies clamoured for a catch to short mid-off, Mackay refused to budge. The draw, breathlessly, was eventually secured, whereupon the hosts took the similarly exhilarating final Test, by just two wickets, and with it the most resplendent of all series, the series that single-handedly insured Test cricket against extinction until Ian Botham renewed the policy 20 years later.

2) Ian Botham and Graham Dilley, Headingley 1981
Ninety-three behind, three wickets left, hope drawing its final breath. Another Australian victory and they'd be two-up with three to play - the Ashes, to all intents and purposes, in the bag. Such was the somewhat unpromising situation when Graham "Picca" Dilley joined Ian "Lord of the Lads" Botham on the fourth afternoon. "Have you checked out of the hotel yet?" wondered Botham. The young fast bowler had not, deeming it "the wrong thing to do". "I have," proclaimed Botham, "but I forgot to pay the extras bill. I hope I don't have to go back." The game, he added, had "gone". Hence the ensuing rallying cry: "Let's give it some humpty!" Up on the balcony, Dilley, who had cobbled together 11 runs in seven innings in the winter's series against the West Indies, had already agreed a strategy with Chris Old, the next man in - "If it's on the stumps block it. If not, welly it."

And so they did, wellying and humptying 117 in 80 minutes, heedless of bowlers, pitch, restraint or caution, turning red into black. At its heart lay the art of competition. Dilley lit the fuse, scoring 22 of the first 27. "Picca kept hitting so I decided to join in," Botham would explain. Dilley, though, claims it was sheer pique: he was catching the great allrounder up. "I don't think he was that pleased."

Of course, Botham's subsequent stands with Old and Bob Willis, not to mention Willis' onslaught on the final day, were still required to complete the least probable of Test victories, but here was the unwitting inspiration from which all else flowed, conjuring the faintest whiff of hope from a sea of resignation. "The change in the way the Aussies were reacting made you think something was going to happen," Dilley would reflect. "But nobody really pictured what actually was."

1) Brian Lara and Courtney Walsh, Bridgetown 1999
Petite but exquisitely formed: never mind the quantity, feel the fantasy. Admittedly, but for Lara's preceding ninth-wicket stand with Curtly Ambrose, this duet, worth a paltry nine runs, would have been consigned to the distant recesses of the memory instead of standing proudly at the forefront. Pursuing 308 against an attack led by McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Stuart MacGill and Warne, West Indies lost half the order cheaply before Jimmy Adams helped Lara add 133. Then McGrath sent back Adams, Nehemiah Perry and Ridley Jacobs in swift succession, and although Healy dropped Lara, Gillespie unglued the stubborn Ambrose with the score unchanged, bringing in Walsh with six required. To come so close and still lose would break more than just Bajan hearts, but here was a chap with a record 32 Test ducks under his belt.

In all, the porous Jamaican faced just five deliveries from Gillespie and McGrath, one a no-ball and one that counts among the most errant the latter ever served up. Had Walsh succumbed to any of the three legitimate ones he faced in succession from Gillespie, his partner's unconquered 153, by common consent the greatest match-winning innings of modern times, would have been in vain. But he did not, and when Lara drove the winning four, the game was blessed with its feelgoodest, most gloriously Disneyfied denouement.

The greatest match-winning stand, in terms of sheer substance, is surely the 238 by Adam Gilchrist and Justin Langer in Hobart in 1999: Pakistan (Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib and Saqlain) had removed Australia's top five for 126, yet were prevented from striking again until the target was but five runs distant - and by attack rather than attrition. The Lara-Walsh duet still nourished the romantic soul like no other.

From a neutral perspective, there was another cause for joy. The soccer season was bubbling to its climax, the ICC World Cup weeks away; the latest bulletin on Mike Atherton's back was discouraging and patriotically led the sports pages for the early editions. Yet the Guardian, to its eternal credit, still pushed it downpage to celebrate this major minor miracle. Who says sporting coverage is blinded by national flags?

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • delbnz on March 5, 2009, 19:36 GMT

    I too am saddened that the 10th wicket stand to save the NZ vs' Eng test in Ajn 1997 isn't here - I'm not sur eIf I missed the boat on whether you actually needed to win or not but Danny orrison was the then holder of the most ducks in tests and yet he managed to fend of the best the english attack could send down. At the other ned Nathan Astle went on to score a century and the match was saved. This is glorious stuff and cannot be expunged from history so easily. You want guts 'n glory, those two men epitomised it on the 24th Jan 1997.

    Morrison scored a sensational 14 of only 133 balls in 144 minutes. It was the most ainful innings to whatch, his ability to sell his wicket cheaply left him that day and the draw felt like a win.

    It was in fact Morrisons' last test (forced).

  • NavalPatel on March 5, 2009, 6:56 GMT

    I offer you Doug Ring and Bill Johnston at Melbourne against West Indies in 1952.

  • elsmallo on March 5, 2009, 2:10 GMT

    I was lucky enough to see the '99 Bridgetown Test live. The final partnership is the first thing I mention to anyone interested, but it was an amazing match, and series, in all. It was probably the only time the great Australian team was resisted until the famous India tour, and it was really the final hurrah for a West Indies in decline. They were behind for the first few days and the locals were all debating Lara's captaincy, but Sherwin Campbell and Pedro Collins kept them in the game. The ground filled up on the final day as word of Lara's innings got around. Ambrose was furious when he got out and Walsh looked totally hopeless; the tension in the stadium was unbearable. It was the old Bridgetown stadium and when Lara hit the winning four everyone ran on to the pitch to mob him; I've not seen this happen since and I can't imagine it happening at any of the new grounds in WI or anywhere else in the world. I'll never forget it and live in hope that I'll see something like it again.

  • MarkLing on March 5, 2009, 0:57 GMT

    Has everyone forgotten about Nathan Astle and Danny Morrison batting for New Zealand, v England, Auckland, 24 Jan 1997, Test # 1351.

    They needed to bat out almost the entire 5th day in order to save the test match. Danny Morrison being #11, I've never seen such a long 10th wicket unbroken stand, especially given that a single wicket would have lost us the match.

  • WPHE on March 4, 2009, 23:25 GMT

    Agree with MrKricket - the Border-Thomson partnership from 4th Ashes test at MCG in December 1982 should make the list. Needing 292 to win, the ninth wicket fell at 218 late on the fourth day. Thomson lasted over two hours with Border. The end is memorable to every Australian TV watcher as channel 9 had not returned from a Sidchrome spanner ad when Thomson was out from the first ball of an over with four runs still required. Coverage resumed with the players already departing the field, and it took replays to show Thomson's edge to first slip fended up into the air to be taken by Miller at second slip.

  • porotodean on March 4, 2009, 23:21 GMT

    These are all fine partnerships, but don't forget the Waugh Brothers' big stand in the fourth test against the West Indies in 1995, when both brothers scored centuries and Steve went on to 200. This was the partnership that changed world cricket's power base - Australia went on to win the match by an innings and take the series, and dominate world cricket for over a decade after.

  • Joggernaut on March 4, 2009, 22:56 GMT

    For all the "why VVS Dravid partnership was not here" cribbers, I think the criteria was that atleast one guy had to be a bowler (atleast not a regular batsman).

    Else I think http://content.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63291.html which featured a second ranked partnership between Botham and Dilley matches exactly in context with the eden partnership. (Both against Aus, both involving a follow on, both with a resurgent partnership, both involving a fifth inning aussie collapse in under 4 sessions)

  • Synaesthesia on March 4, 2009, 19:23 GMT

    Hussey-Mcgrath putting on 107 for the 10th Wicket against SA - 2nd test in Melbourne December 2005. A great partnership in my opinion - although very depressing for South African fans!

  • Jonathan_E on March 4, 2009, 18:53 GMT

    Rob Steen makes note of the Australian last-wicket partnership between Kasprowicz and Lee, in 2005 at Edgbaston, which came *so* close to giving them victory.

    Let us leave aside the fact that the catch which ended it, was a very close decision which could be regarded as controversial: let us leave aside also the fact that Kasprowicz was fortunate to survive an equally contentious LBW appeal, some fifty runs earlier: let us instead concentrate on the fact that the match contained *another* last-wicket partnership, of equal importance, and also over 50: Andrew Flintoff and Simon Jones, in England's innings. Without them, the target would have been a great deal smaller: their last-ditch stand - in which Jones successfully fended off Warne for a few overs while Flintoff smashed Lee and Kasprowicz into the crowd - was what won the match for England.

  • sushantsingh on March 4, 2009, 18:44 GMT

    The list ca not satisfy everyone, but it is indeed a good one. lara's 153 is THE GREATEST TEST INNINGS OF MODERN TIMES and is rightly mentioned here. MOST OF THE INDIANS ARE BIASED that's why they look unhappy from the author,s view. But in my opinion wonderful article. Keep it up.

  • delbnz on March 5, 2009, 19:36 GMT

    I too am saddened that the 10th wicket stand to save the NZ vs' Eng test in Ajn 1997 isn't here - I'm not sur eIf I missed the boat on whether you actually needed to win or not but Danny orrison was the then holder of the most ducks in tests and yet he managed to fend of the best the english attack could send down. At the other ned Nathan Astle went on to score a century and the match was saved. This is glorious stuff and cannot be expunged from history so easily. You want guts 'n glory, those two men epitomised it on the 24th Jan 1997.

    Morrison scored a sensational 14 of only 133 balls in 144 minutes. It was the most ainful innings to whatch, his ability to sell his wicket cheaply left him that day and the draw felt like a win.

    It was in fact Morrisons' last test (forced).

  • NavalPatel on March 5, 2009, 6:56 GMT

    I offer you Doug Ring and Bill Johnston at Melbourne against West Indies in 1952.

  • elsmallo on March 5, 2009, 2:10 GMT

    I was lucky enough to see the '99 Bridgetown Test live. The final partnership is the first thing I mention to anyone interested, but it was an amazing match, and series, in all. It was probably the only time the great Australian team was resisted until the famous India tour, and it was really the final hurrah for a West Indies in decline. They were behind for the first few days and the locals were all debating Lara's captaincy, but Sherwin Campbell and Pedro Collins kept them in the game. The ground filled up on the final day as word of Lara's innings got around. Ambrose was furious when he got out and Walsh looked totally hopeless; the tension in the stadium was unbearable. It was the old Bridgetown stadium and when Lara hit the winning four everyone ran on to the pitch to mob him; I've not seen this happen since and I can't imagine it happening at any of the new grounds in WI or anywhere else in the world. I'll never forget it and live in hope that I'll see something like it again.

  • MarkLing on March 5, 2009, 0:57 GMT

    Has everyone forgotten about Nathan Astle and Danny Morrison batting for New Zealand, v England, Auckland, 24 Jan 1997, Test # 1351.

    They needed to bat out almost the entire 5th day in order to save the test match. Danny Morrison being #11, I've never seen such a long 10th wicket unbroken stand, especially given that a single wicket would have lost us the match.

  • WPHE on March 4, 2009, 23:25 GMT

    Agree with MrKricket - the Border-Thomson partnership from 4th Ashes test at MCG in December 1982 should make the list. Needing 292 to win, the ninth wicket fell at 218 late on the fourth day. Thomson lasted over two hours with Border. The end is memorable to every Australian TV watcher as channel 9 had not returned from a Sidchrome spanner ad when Thomson was out from the first ball of an over with four runs still required. Coverage resumed with the players already departing the field, and it took replays to show Thomson's edge to first slip fended up into the air to be taken by Miller at second slip.

  • porotodean on March 4, 2009, 23:21 GMT

    These are all fine partnerships, but don't forget the Waugh Brothers' big stand in the fourth test against the West Indies in 1995, when both brothers scored centuries and Steve went on to 200. This was the partnership that changed world cricket's power base - Australia went on to win the match by an innings and take the series, and dominate world cricket for over a decade after.

  • Joggernaut on March 4, 2009, 22:56 GMT

    For all the "why VVS Dravid partnership was not here" cribbers, I think the criteria was that atleast one guy had to be a bowler (atleast not a regular batsman).

    Else I think http://content.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63291.html which featured a second ranked partnership between Botham and Dilley matches exactly in context with the eden partnership. (Both against Aus, both involving a follow on, both with a resurgent partnership, both involving a fifth inning aussie collapse in under 4 sessions)

  • Synaesthesia on March 4, 2009, 19:23 GMT

    Hussey-Mcgrath putting on 107 for the 10th Wicket against SA - 2nd test in Melbourne December 2005. A great partnership in my opinion - although very depressing for South African fans!

  • Jonathan_E on March 4, 2009, 18:53 GMT

    Rob Steen makes note of the Australian last-wicket partnership between Kasprowicz and Lee, in 2005 at Edgbaston, which came *so* close to giving them victory.

    Let us leave aside the fact that the catch which ended it, was a very close decision which could be regarded as controversial: let us leave aside also the fact that Kasprowicz was fortunate to survive an equally contentious LBW appeal, some fifty runs earlier: let us instead concentrate on the fact that the match contained *another* last-wicket partnership, of equal importance, and also over 50: Andrew Flintoff and Simon Jones, in England's innings. Without them, the target would have been a great deal smaller: their last-ditch stand - in which Jones successfully fended off Warne for a few overs while Flintoff smashed Lee and Kasprowicz into the crowd - was what won the match for England.

  • sushantsingh on March 4, 2009, 18:44 GMT

    The list ca not satisfy everyone, but it is indeed a good one. lara's 153 is THE GREATEST TEST INNINGS OF MODERN TIMES and is rightly mentioned here. MOST OF THE INDIANS ARE BIASED that's why they look unhappy from the author,s view. But in my opinion wonderful article. Keep it up.

  • lalitdas1020 on March 4, 2009, 18:06 GMT

    i think the partnership between Dravid and Laxman at Eden Gardens, Kolkata should also find a mention here... one of the very few instances when a team came from following on to win the test match...

  • skalwani on March 4, 2009, 16:33 GMT

    By leaving out the VVS Laxman-R Dravid partnership, you are narrowing your list to exclude the greatest comeback ever for teams in the entire history of cricket.

  • Pantherscc on March 4, 2009, 14:51 GMT

    The Gilchrist and Langer stand was a result of some gracious empiring decisions which obviously favored the home team. Gilchrist edged the ball to keeper of Wasim, a dismissal which even Bothams Gramd Ma would have adjudged correctly.

    In my opinion Dravid and Laxman stand should had featured in the list.

  • Mustafa007 on March 4, 2009, 14:32 GMT

    Are you the same writer who wrote this about Monty Panesar - 'It is not all that inconceivable that the overall Test wicket-taking record could yet be his.'

    Jokes apart, it is a good list. Wondering if VVS and Dravid's could have made it to this list.

  • ghostof-rayeast on March 4, 2009, 13:45 GMT

    I am amazed Mike Atherton and Jack Russell at Jo'Burg in 1995 don't warrant a mention. Unbelievable guts from both men

  • Harrows on March 4, 2009, 11:23 GMT

    What about Jonty Rhodes and Allan Donald at the SCG (?94). Can't recall how much but was the difference in the end.

  • NumberXI on March 4, 2009, 11:11 GMT

    For those cribbing about the BCCI mindset. Bradman-Fingleton was not a tail-end partnership nor were the conditions so tough, because the wicket was "rich couch stuffed with runs". So, to suggest that the Dravid-Laxman partnership should also appear here isn't about mindsets, at all. React to the idea, not to the people, please! Second, if indeed it was about vital partnerships, Harbhajan Singh and Sameer Dighe are a good pair to include for their match-winning efforts in the 2001 Chennai Test which won India the series. Dighe was a last-minute inclusion, in his first test against McGrath-Warne-Gillespie. He had a bad game behind the stumps but he (reportedly) still had the gumption to tell a teammate, in English, to watch out for Miller, because of which Waugh persisted with the off-spinner. Finally, Indians watch more Indian cricket than they do the rest of the world. That is not about mindsets, but about what they remember of watching India play. Take off those BCCI-tinted glasses

  • Genolk on March 4, 2009, 11:04 GMT

    Lots of debate on this one as there always is. No one will ever agree fully. And speaking of which, I thought Nathan Astle and Danny Morrison in 1997 against England at Eden Park could have rated a mention. 14 runs off 133 balls for Morrison during a 106 hundred run partnership which took the puff out of England and secured a draw. It happened to be Danny Morrisons last test. His reward for helping Astle save the match? He got dumped for the next test and retired.

  • Scopey123 on March 4, 2009, 10:59 GMT

    What an article that doesn't feature Tendulkar and Laxman? Shock horror. Blogging and journalism on cricket is so thankless when the blinkered Indian fans get on the case.

    For all those that are desperate for every journalist to mention these guys ad nauseum, i refer you to the piece Ian Chappel wrote on these pages about this year's best XI which had ONLY 6 Indians in the team.

    Just sit and enjoy an article for heaven's sake.

  • prashant1 on March 4, 2009, 10:48 GMT

    Surely a lot of neutral fans would place the laxman-dravid stand right up there. Nationality and regional bias notwithstanding. Why cant pakistani fans offer a proper cricketing rebuttal for a change? instead of assuming that all cricket fans,like the pakistani ones,are purely regionally biased. why?

  • DravidRocks on March 4, 2009, 10:34 GMT

    On the outlook, yes, it is indeed shocking and appalling to see the names of Dravid and Laxman omitted from this elite list. Ponder over it again and you will see the list contains names who were not even expected to get off the mark, let alone helping their teams get through. When u come to partnerships like Laxman/Dravid, S'kara/J'dena... you are biased to expect such knocks from them, because that is their primary duty. Whereas for a number 10/11 or for that matter a number 7/8, contributing little with bat is an extraordinary contribution. In such a case, if that knock leads to a partnership that takes your team home against teams like australia, it definitely deserves a mention and Rob Steen here has done exactly that.

  • Ranadurjay on March 4, 2009, 10:01 GMT

    While the article is surely well-written, as most Rob Steen articles are, there are a lot of logical inconsistencies. If the argument is that partnerships featuring tail-enders have been preferred, "given the timeless allure of the tail-end rally", to quote Steen himself, then how does the Bradman-Fingleton partnership figure in the list, even if it was a sixth wicket partnership? If you have to put in one partnership lower down the order, but featuring regular batsmen, then surely Laxman-Dravid's 2001 partnership at Eden Gardens against the mighty Aussies is an obvious choice. Arguably, that Test is the greatest turnaround in cricketing history, a match where, I am proud to report, I was present at the ground on all five days. You just need to look at the quality of the opposition to deduce that it was way superior than England's Headingley triumph in '81.

  • ShehzadKhan on March 4, 2009, 9:03 GMT

    I would suggest the Indian readers to get out of the BCCI mindset.

    BCCI can dictate ICC because of their financial muscles, now you are trying to dictate writers to follow suite? why?

  • Roscoe on March 4, 2009, 8:24 GMT

    Iscariot: how can you mention Martin & Chatfield in the same breath? Martin is so bad he makes Chats look good.

  • kakeji on March 4, 2009, 7:42 GMT

    Given the vitriolic comments here, would Cricnfo please oblige us and have an editor sit on top of Mr. Steen's head before he gets another article out? Its absolutely unbelieveable that the Dravid / Laxman partnership or the Gilchrist / Langer stand have been missed out in the name of being "big" or "legendary" (aren't these the partnerships which are more stirring than the others?)

  • The_Wog on March 4, 2009, 7:22 GMT

    Fear not, IND supporters: "Here, nonetheless, in ascending order, is your starter for 10." He listed 5, will complete the list soon (prob tomorrow) and Dravid-Laxman should rightly be the last listed. (BTW, we're still mighty - just beat the #2 side in consecutive Tests now that we've weeded out some "passengers.")

  • Harish.Acharya on March 4, 2009, 7:13 GMT

    Guys, this is not about the greatest stands per-se. It is about remarkable stands from guys who would have succumbed on any other day but somehow gathered themselves to show resolve and strength while saving their teams. Dravid-Laxman, etc are capable batsmen and big numbers come naturally to them as they have proved many times.

  • kiriket_nawabs on March 4, 2009, 6:31 GMT

    Just now realized that Dear Mr Rob Steen has categorized the Eden Heroics of Lakshman and Dravid into number crunching pool (For all the indelibility of the really big numbers (Sangakkara and Jayawardene's 624, Jayasuriya and Mahanama's 576, Laxman and Dravid's 374) and the legendary ones (Watson and Bailey's 163, Hirst and Rhodes' 15), assessments of worth are about far more than mere number-crunching). I don't know what to tell to you when you categorize the 2001 Eden Garden heroics to merely number crunching. I guess the biggest partnership for you would be the one that gets the Ashes back to England. Rob can you explain the context in which the Eden heroics just became a mere number crunching stat?

  • SRT_Jammy_Dada_VVS_and_Anil_legends on March 4, 2009, 5:41 GMT

    Yes these are all valid and memorable partnerships but i think it was unfair to leave Dravid-Laxman out considering the match situation, and even more unfair to get their stand wrong! It was 376, NOT 374! and what about Dravid-Laxman at Adelaide?

  • batmannrobin on March 4, 2009, 4:51 GMT

    Dravid - Laxman has to be there inevitably. 1 down , following on , opponents literally 1 wicket away from win n an attack that reads Mcgrath Warne Gillespie n Kasprowicz..It was not jus series turnin..changed the complexion of indian cricket. Just look at Indian wins before that and after it

  • rkm1984 on March 4, 2009, 4:32 GMT

    See...Like we dont have a Sachin Tendulkar in Madam Tussuads, Dravid and Laxman's epic innings in 2001 was omitted...I should beat myself up for reading through this...

  • Redemption on March 4, 2009, 3:50 GMT

    How come no mention of Dravid and Laxman's epic partnership in Kolkata against the then mighty Aussies to deny them a record 17th test win? It was perhaps even more awesome than Gilchrist and Langer's stand in Hobart, if you take in to account the sheer pressure on the Indians.

  • MrKricket on March 4, 2009, 3:42 GMT

    Good read. Funny that all five involve Australia - 3 on the receiving end!

    Another 'nearly' partnership was Border and Thomson for the last wicket in 82-83 where they fell short by a miserable 3 runs! The fact that they came together needing 74 (from memory) on the evening of the 4th day and needed another 37 on the last day shows it was a long, concerted effort. Border was allowed to take singles by England and he played himself back into form. In the end it was the first over where Thomson was on strike to the first ball of the over where it all went wrong.

    This sort of partnership is worth ten 400+ run partnerships!

  • kiriket_nawabs on March 4, 2009, 3:30 GMT

    What happened to Laxman and Dravid's 376 on the unforgettable 14-March-2001 ? Coming back from 1 test down and then following on in the second test to bat out the whole day....where does that stand ?

  • iscariot on March 4, 2009, 3:15 GMT

    Surprised the winning partnerrship by Coney and Chatfield vs Pakistan [with a fired up and overly enthusiastic Wasim Akram] in the early 80's doesn't get an honorable mention. To find Coney, a solid reliable batsman who prospered in the latter part of his career, is not a surpise to as a member of a last-pair last-gasp victory, but Chatfield was a true number 11 in the style of great NZ number 11's Morrison and Martin.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • iscariot on March 4, 2009, 3:15 GMT

    Surprised the winning partnerrship by Coney and Chatfield vs Pakistan [with a fired up and overly enthusiastic Wasim Akram] in the early 80's doesn't get an honorable mention. To find Coney, a solid reliable batsman who prospered in the latter part of his career, is not a surpise to as a member of a last-pair last-gasp victory, but Chatfield was a true number 11 in the style of great NZ number 11's Morrison and Martin.

  • kiriket_nawabs on March 4, 2009, 3:30 GMT

    What happened to Laxman and Dravid's 376 on the unforgettable 14-March-2001 ? Coming back from 1 test down and then following on in the second test to bat out the whole day....where does that stand ?

  • MrKricket on March 4, 2009, 3:42 GMT

    Good read. Funny that all five involve Australia - 3 on the receiving end!

    Another 'nearly' partnership was Border and Thomson for the last wicket in 82-83 where they fell short by a miserable 3 runs! The fact that they came together needing 74 (from memory) on the evening of the 4th day and needed another 37 on the last day shows it was a long, concerted effort. Border was allowed to take singles by England and he played himself back into form. In the end it was the first over where Thomson was on strike to the first ball of the over where it all went wrong.

    This sort of partnership is worth ten 400+ run partnerships!

  • Redemption on March 4, 2009, 3:50 GMT

    How come no mention of Dravid and Laxman's epic partnership in Kolkata against the then mighty Aussies to deny them a record 17th test win? It was perhaps even more awesome than Gilchrist and Langer's stand in Hobart, if you take in to account the sheer pressure on the Indians.

  • rkm1984 on March 4, 2009, 4:32 GMT

    See...Like we dont have a Sachin Tendulkar in Madam Tussuads, Dravid and Laxman's epic innings in 2001 was omitted...I should beat myself up for reading through this...

  • batmannrobin on March 4, 2009, 4:51 GMT

    Dravid - Laxman has to be there inevitably. 1 down , following on , opponents literally 1 wicket away from win n an attack that reads Mcgrath Warne Gillespie n Kasprowicz..It was not jus series turnin..changed the complexion of indian cricket. Just look at Indian wins before that and after it

  • SRT_Jammy_Dada_VVS_and_Anil_legends on March 4, 2009, 5:41 GMT

    Yes these are all valid and memorable partnerships but i think it was unfair to leave Dravid-Laxman out considering the match situation, and even more unfair to get their stand wrong! It was 376, NOT 374! and what about Dravid-Laxman at Adelaide?

  • kiriket_nawabs on March 4, 2009, 6:31 GMT

    Just now realized that Dear Mr Rob Steen has categorized the Eden Heroics of Lakshman and Dravid into number crunching pool (For all the indelibility of the really big numbers (Sangakkara and Jayawardene's 624, Jayasuriya and Mahanama's 576, Laxman and Dravid's 374) and the legendary ones (Watson and Bailey's 163, Hirst and Rhodes' 15), assessments of worth are about far more than mere number-crunching). I don't know what to tell to you when you categorize the 2001 Eden Garden heroics to merely number crunching. I guess the biggest partnership for you would be the one that gets the Ashes back to England. Rob can you explain the context in which the Eden heroics just became a mere number crunching stat?

  • Harish.Acharya on March 4, 2009, 7:13 GMT

    Guys, this is not about the greatest stands per-se. It is about remarkable stands from guys who would have succumbed on any other day but somehow gathered themselves to show resolve and strength while saving their teams. Dravid-Laxman, etc are capable batsmen and big numbers come naturally to them as they have proved many times.

  • The_Wog on March 4, 2009, 7:22 GMT

    Fear not, IND supporters: "Here, nonetheless, in ascending order, is your starter for 10." He listed 5, will complete the list soon (prob tomorrow) and Dravid-Laxman should rightly be the last listed. (BTW, we're still mighty - just beat the #2 side in consecutive Tests now that we've weeded out some "passengers.")