Ed Smith
Ed Smith Ed SmithRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former England, Kent and Middlesex batsman; writer for the New Statesman

The problem's not Test cricket, it's bad Test cricket

It is the product that matters. If the interest in Test cricket is declining, it is because the standard is not all that high

Ed Smith

February 2, 2012

Comments: 125 | Text size: A | A

A view from the chimney pots: fans watch the Ashes from the rooftops, England v Australia, London, September 12, 2005
The 2005 Ashes had people packing the rooftops because it was top-drawer stuff © Getty Images
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: India tour of Australia

During the Adelaide Test match between India and Australia, I was interviewed for a documentary about the future of Test cricket. Clever arguments eluded me - perhaps because I had half an eye on the astonishing quality of the tennis at the Australian Open in Melbourne.

Then I realised that was exactly the point: I wasn't focused on the future of Test cricket for a very good reason. Abstract questions were being elbowed aside by live sport of the highest quality in Melbourne. Invited to speculate about one sport's uncertain future, my mind wandered to a different sport's thrilling present.

Then I realised that I had identified the problem, entirely by accident. If Test cricket could boast four top teams as good as Djokovic, Nadal, Federer and Murray - and if the rivalries between them were as subtle and unpredictable - we wouldn't be talking about the decline of Test cricket in the first place. We'd be talking about its golden age.

What can be done? The art of strategy is not assembling a long list of aspirations. It depends on identifying the single issue that really matters. "It's the economy, stupid." That was the political strategist James Carville's legendary memo to Bill Clinton during the 1992 American presidential election.

For Test cricket, the strategy should be simple: "It's the product, stupid." The argument that modern audiences no longer have the attention span to enjoy the longer game is a convenient excuse for not sorting out the underlying problems. The real issue is that the product has been watered down by poor scheduling, made bland by boring wickets and isolated by punitive ticket prices.

In 2003-04, I attended the English National Academy in preparation for an England A tour. English cricket was on the way up, but it still hadn't quite captured the public imagination. I remember one member of the support staff telling me: "Test cricket will never again be a truly popular sport because it doesn't have any celebrities like David Beckham."

He was proved seriously wrong within 18 months. The 2005 Ashes gripped a nation. You couldn't get in a taxi without hearing the radio relaying breathless commentary about the latest swing in momentum. England went cricket-mad. Why? Because the cricket - the Test cricket - was of the highest possible quality.

Great Test cricket is not only entertaining, it is enthralling. It gets into the blood. The overwhelming priority must be to ensure that a much higher proportion of Test cricket is dramatic and enthralling.

How can that be achieved? First, play the game on wickets that offer a fair balance between bat and ball. Wickets should bounce, they should offer a certain amount of seam movement and they should turn later in the match. The best way for fans to achieve this is to stop celebrating meaningless batting milestones - it only encourages wrong-headed groundsmen. Newspaper editors could help too, by flatly ignoring boring draws. The message would be clear: if you want column inches, give us some lively cricket.

Secondly, if boards can't fill the grounds at existing ticket prices, lower the prices until the grounds are full. Thirdly, ensure that captains comply with over rates by banning those who fail (the ICC deserves credit for doing just that to MS Dhoni). Finally, a Test series should be like a boxing match: there must be enough rest and preparation beforehand that both pugilists arrive in peak condition. Anticipation is a central component of drama. A Test series should never be allowed to be an afterthought.

"What do they know of cricket who only cricket know?" CLR James's aphorism is perhaps the more perceptive line ever written about cricket. And with good reason: exposure to life outside beyond the boundary helps its devotees return to cricket refreshed and clearer-eyed.

A Test series should be like a boxing match: there must be enough rest and preparation before-hand that both pugilists arrive in peak condition. Anticipation is a central component of drama. A Test series should never be allowed to be an afterthought

After Adelaide, I went to Melbourne for the semi-finals and final of the men's tennis. It is hard to capture the quality of what I witnessed without lapsing into a long list of adjectives: superlative, gladiatorial, epic, superhuman. Each of the three matches was sport of the highest class. Each story was like the 2005 Ashes condensed into one night.

Modern tennis players attack better and they defend better; they are more athletic and more skilled; they are tougher mentally and yet more expressive; they are more relentless in their pursuit of victory and more gracious in defeat. Even the legends of the past yield to the titans of the present. Can the same things be said about Test cricket? I fear not.

It's not just tennis that has evolved for the better. Look at football. I don't support Barcelona, but I celebrate how they have changed sport. They have resolved perhaps the longest argument in the history of games: they have proved that you can play with unsurpassable flair and yet also relentless pragmatism. They are purists but they are also winners. They are David Gower and Don Bradman rolled into one. Football's golden age is here and now.

What has all this to do with cricket? Everything. The evolution of other sports provides the context in which cricket operates. When I was a cricket-mad kid, I never thought I might enjoy watching other sports almost as much as Test cricket. But that is how things have turned out.

The English sportswriter Simon Barnes once said that Test cricket is like a great novel. It stays with you. Ironically, the cynics have been saying the novel is dead for almost as long as it has been alive. But the cynics are wrong. The novel endures and always will endure because it does something that no other art form can. The problem is not the novel, it is bad novels. As the author Kinglsey Amis put it, "I love reading. It's finding good books that's so difficult."

The same is true of cricket. The problem is not "Test cricket"; it is bad Test cricket.

It's the product, stupid.

Former England, Kent and Middlesex batsman Ed Smith is a writer with the Times. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Ed Smith

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (February 5, 2012, 15:48 GMT)

Simple, well-thought out article by Ed Smith. He has hit the nail on the head by stating that it's the poor quality of test cricket that is on offer these days that resulted in the decline of the classic format. There was a hardly was a heroic achievement in the recent past that people can talk about with a lot of excitement. The supposedly dull, slow-moving test cricket of yesteryear had heroes who saved games from the jaws of defeat but the speed-driven, Sehwagian test cricket of the modern day folds up in just less than three days.

Posted by harshthakor on (February 4, 2012, 5:00 GMT)

I agree that the standard may have declined but we are getting a series of enthralling results after hard fought games in test Cricket.-,the longer format of the game.Remember the outstanding series between the Proteas and the Aussies last year and the West Indies tour of India.Almost every match has a result of the ideal preparation of wickets and in the last year the bowlers did remarkably well which was a significant fact.Toady scoring rates are much higher than before.Many games have proved that there is no substitute for test cricket.-,which has unparalleled twists and turns.

I hope an era emerges where a generation of great players will replace the current or recently retired greats and great teams could emerge but we have to recognize the healthy development of the game in terms of contest.

Posted by kunderanengineer on (February 4, 2012, 3:24 GMT)

This is the age old debate since sports leagues were created - is it better to have a league made up of 4 or 5 super teams surrounded by average or below average teams or a highly competitive league with parity where guessing the outcome of any given contest amounts to flipping a coin? I would lean towards the 2nd option as long as parity does not =mediocrity. The problem in world cricket today is the predictability of outcomes especially in the test matches-the pitches disproportionally favour the home sides which means good cricket at home and bad abroad. The author refers to the need to have 4 strong teams and makes the analogy to tennis' big 4. However, remember that mens tennis only got really interesting after Nadal and then Djokovic broke Federer's dominance on grass and hard courts and now Djokovic is in the process of ending Nadal's monopoly on clay.Speaking strictly as a fan I would love to see for example both India & England end the other's home surface dominance as well.

Posted by   on (February 4, 2012, 1:59 GMT)

all the three formats probably in near future more formats like T 10 may also come should be managed by different organisations since requirements for all the formats is different.let it be that each country have alltoghter different team for its format.

Posted by   on (February 4, 2012, 1:25 GMT)

India, with its ageing team, has fallen off in Test Cricket since the Summer of 2011. India won easily at home, and also won their latest Test Series' in New Zealand and the West Indies, and India drew in South Africa. Before last summer, India also won the test series in England and competed well in Australia.

However, Indians follow their stars more than their team. Once Tendulkar retires, attendences will fall further in India for Test matches

India is the economic powerhouse of cricket. For world cricket to succeed, Indian cricket must succeed,

Posted by Long-Leg on (February 3, 2012, 18:21 GMT)

When India played their four test series in England in July and August last year the thing that upset me the most was the fact that the Indian team (with the exception of Dravid) didn't appear to care. They gave the impression that this important test series was a distraction from the one day and T20 game. Test cricket is and always will be the highest form of the game. When will administrators and players around the world realise this simple truth and adjust schedules and financial rewards accordingly?

Posted by AlanHarrison on (February 3, 2012, 15:32 GMT)

@pak94fan; well it's very generous of you as a Pakistan fan to take that opinion of the 2005 series, of the England team of that era, and more broadly of the Ashes in general. My opinion, for what it's worth, and it may not be worth very much, is closer to the view which I have heard advanced from some fans not only of your own team, but also of South Africa, India, and Sri Lanka, which is that the importance of the Ashes is overhyped, particularly in England. I think some English observers, Mr Smith included, tend in consequence to persuade themselves that whenever there is drama in an Ashes contest, some truly exceptional cricket must have taken place: but logically, that does not necessarily follow.

Posted by   on (February 3, 2012, 9:33 GMT)

just to add one more thing...in the last 35 or so tests...there have been about 5 draws. Add to the face there have been some amazing test in the last 18 months...if the crowds are down its probably becuase in this day and age, playing a match for 5 days, just isnt that feasible any more.

Posted by caught_knott_bowled_old on (February 3, 2012, 9:10 GMT)

No other sport has 3 (yes THREE) official formats being played at an International level. The custodians of cricket felt that in order for cricket to survive, it had to be abbreviated to 50 and now 20 overs cricket. The shorter formats have cannibalized Test cricket..no question..The sponsors and the next generation of players are all being diverted to where the money is...the shorter formats. Even the most die-hard cricket enthusiast can only take so much cricket. So, ICC needs to figure out how cricket is going to be packaged and sold. As a gripping novel or as a 30min sit-com.

Posted by   on (February 3, 2012, 9:01 GMT)

give me a break...nothing did more harm to test cricket than almost 20 years of meaningless one-sided Ashes series played every two years at the expense of the growth of the game. Granted the last few have been good quality...all through the late 80s, 90s and early 2000 they were painfully one sided, yet happened all the bloody time time!! that killed interest...but Aussies/English will never accept that.

Also, India has been home to some of the most intesresting, exciting and nail biting tests. All with results, all with high scoring matches. So now, you dont have to fast bouncy wickets to have good test cricket

this story might as well have been killed "Lets just have Australia play England and stuff the rest!"

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print

    'Everyone stares at you when you're 6ft 8in'

Boyd Rankin talks about giants, playing for the enemy, and being mentored by Allan Donald

    Bravo's withdrawal highlights cricket's stress malaise

Tony Cozier: He and Kieran Powell should follow Lara's example by seeking professional help to resurrect their promising careers

    Four afternoons into immortality

Rewind: In 1899 a 13-year-old orphan at Clifton College established a world record which stands to this day

    A crisis that defines the age

David Hopps: In England, changes in social attitudes, the demands of work, and other factors are contributing to a decline in recreational cricket

Is Sarfraz Ahmed Pakistan's best wicketkeeper-batsman ever?

Kamran Abbasi: His stats so far and the calm assurance he showed in Dubai mark him as one to watch

News | Features Last 7 days

Pakistan should not welcome Amir back

The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past

Contrite Kohli, apoplectic Kohli, and a Dhoni impersonator

Plays of the day from the fifth ODI in Ranchi

'I don't blame Arjuna for my early retirement'

Former Sri Lanka batsman Asanka Gurusinha talks about playing and coaching in Australia, and tactics during the 1996 World Cup

Dhoni's absence a guide to India's future

He's past his use-by date as a Test captain and keeper. India now have a chance to test Kohli's leadership skills

'I'm a bit disappointed not to get that Test average up to 50'

Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the need to bridge the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka

News | Features Last 7 days