Bangladesh in Sri Lanka 2012-13 April 1, 2013

Not perfect, but a step ahead for young Sri Lanka

Usually, anything less than a clean sweep against Bangladesh would have invited criticism, but not when Sri Lanka are trying out their next generation

As Sri Lanka's mixed tour arrived at a happy close in Pallekele, Twenty20 captain Dinesh Chandimal's words after the game suggested an encouraging future, just as Angelo Mathews' comments had done after a loss, three nights earlier. Amid a flood of praise for Kusal Perera's bat speed and brutality, Chandimal explained how he would spend the imminent two-month break from international cricket, instead of travelling to India for the IPL. "Over the next two months, I'll be doing a lot of training," he said. "I still have a few issues with my technique that need to be sorted out, so I will be working very hard with the national coaches to correct those issues, looking forward to a busy season."

It was heartening, honest, realism from a young captain, desperate to improve himself after having embarked on a season of sudden responsibility. Captaincy aside, he is now the Test side's wicketkeeper, as well as vice-captain and a key batsman in all three formats. Four months ago, he did not find a place in any of Sri Lanka's preferred XIs.

Mathews had also been candid and introspective after the loss in the third ODI. A wet ball played its role in the result, as did a shortened chase that tilted the match slightly in the visitors' favour, but Mathews refused to find fault anywhere but in Sri Lanka's own performance. It has been a difficult tour for him, with his side having achieved worse-than-anticipated results in the Tests and ODIs. But although he could have justifiably called for patience as an inexperienced captain leading a regenerating side, he apportioned blame where it was deserved and emphasised a commitment to correcting specific shortcomings.

Though as a side, Sri Lanka will be disappointed at not having whitewashed Bangladesh in all formats, as they have done in every home series before, their two young leaders have displayed an awareness of the bigger game that is afoot; that of preparing for a future without Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardene or Tillakaratne Dilshan. It appears that Kusal Perera is likely to become a mainstay - particularly as he could relieve Chandimal of the gloves, if they are deemed too big a burden. Lahiru Thirimanne has also begun producing high-quality innings in earnest, despite not having a settled place in the top order. And Chandimal's own batting has already made major strides towards fortitude and consistency.

Mathews' captaincy betrayed his inexperience at times, particularly as he rifled through bowlers in the Tests, as quickly as most captains would in an ODI. But he hardly allowed the game to meander either, as Dilshan did during his unsuccessful stint at the helm. Under Chandimal's effervescent leadership, the side was electric in the field, and flourished as a collective. He will regret having given part-timer Angelo Perera an over, when plenty remained from his frontline bowlers, but there was much encouragement as well. In all three formats, Chandimal and Mathews were in constant, often animated discussion, before fields were set and bowling changes made.

In the future, it is conceivable the pair might exchange leadership between formats. Chandimal is patently unready for Test captaincy, but his talents and temperament - immature though both still are - seem better suited to the longest format, where he has been most impressive for Sri Lanka. Mathews' all-round ability, meanwhile, is a better fit for limited-overs cricket, where he rarely allows a game to pass in which he has not contributed in either discipline. Sri Lanka's selectors have felt it wise not to overload either captain with all three formats for now, but even as they develop, Chandimal and Mathews appear to have a relationship that might empower a successful split captaincy in years to come.

At any other time, as unconvincing a series as this against Bangladesh would constitute a substantial failing for Sri Lanka. A firm focus on youth during this tour has given the side a grace period, in which poor results will be easily forgiven and forgotten. But if Sri Lanka are to become a major force in cricket once more, Chandimal and Mathews must ensure the improvements they have spoken of come swiftly, and emphatically.

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • associate cricket fan on April 4, 2013, 4:16 GMT

    @Prem2248. Common mate does inzamam speaks good english. Its the skills that matter. If u look at the Pak players, they are not good english speakers. Players like inzamam were one of the successful captains in pak despite of having limited amount of vocabulary.

  • Nimmie on April 4, 2013, 1:42 GMT

    A Captain of any national Side is like an ambassador for that respective country. More often than not, he has to deal with many functions related to Cricket with foreigners, (but not with the local media), therefore there's no better captain than Mathews in this present squad after Madugalle & Mahela to lead the Country. Chandimal may be good player, but how can a person face the foreign media successfully with a limited vocabulary? Mike Brearley (ENG), Imran Khan (PAK) have been regarded as the best personalities to lead teams in International Cricket,but not because of their Cricketing skills but solely because of their man management skills. However the right person to lead any country should at least possess good command of English (language common to all Test Playing countries) while being an intelligent person. Some captains of recent past who came to that position with the help of politicians at times weren't able to understand the questions posed at them.(2 B CNTD)

  • mahbub on April 3, 2013, 23:09 GMT

    bd team: Tamim, Nafees, Ashraful, Shakib, Nasir, Mushfiq, Mahmudullah, Mominul, Gazi,Mashrafi, Nazmul Reserve: Razzak, Anamul, Shafiul, Robiul, enamul jr, Marshal, Shamsur

  • Dru on April 3, 2013, 8:50 GMT

    If all things were equal this would be a dissappointing series for SL but all things were not equal with new leaders and some chaos on the admin front and of course a competitive BD team that has some decent senior players and good young talent. SL will take the win as a step in the right direction but the youngsters need to make big strides to compete with the big 4. With all respect BD and are still a relatively weak test team and SL battled to beat them at home.They also got a hidding in Oz before so lots of work ahead. The main positive factor is the unearthing of some young batting talent but except for Chandi the rest still need to take the big step to test cricket. Come SL's next major test series its a reality that Sanga, Mahela and Dilshan wont be around and with an ageing Herath the youngsters need to step up.

  • keve on April 3, 2013, 8:29 GMT

    The young batting line up coming up certainly not the issue for SL. Nor the spinners ! But the fast bowling department is very weak . Especially in the test department. I mean who can take 3 or 4 wickets up front ? No one. I think SL should motivate SL youngsters for bowling like pakistan. Vaas' value must be more appreciated. Do some projects from school level finding young fast bowlers who are fit , provide them with necessary training and funding

  • Dummy4 on April 2, 2013, 19:26 GMT

    You are right BD in coming days i can see them as dominant force in cricketing world. Who knows they will be better then there counter Asian teams in coming years.

  • manjula on April 2, 2013, 18:28 GMT

    I am not sure why BD fans speaking in such a force. BD still has to prove a lot before making a statement. Young, old, experienced, or better age average or not, SL came top during the engagement. For those who are saying SL will be nowhere after Sanaga, Mahela, and Dilshan, they need to remember all teams prevail after legends departed. Different talents emerged. Who would have thought SL can survive after Aravinda and Sanath.

  • Dummy4 on April 2, 2013, 18:10 GMT

    BD bowling side is very weak than Zimbabwe.they cant rely to win matches only with batting because most of the test nations have a superior batsmens than BD