| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A statistical preview to the ICC T20 World Cup final between Australia and England
Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan
May 15, 2010
Australia made sure that a repeat of the World Cup 1992 final would not take place with a scarcely believable victory over Pakistan in the semi final in St Lucia. Instead, they meet England in the final of a major tournament after 23 years - they met last in the World Cup final in 1987 when Australia won by seven runs. Since 2000, they have faced off six times in major tournaments with the Australians coming out on top five times. Australia revel in big matches, and their extraordinary performance in the semi final against Pakistan is further proof of their steel under pressure. England have been extremely consistent in the tournament so far, but it could be quite a mental battle for them to win against a team which has made it a habit of winning the big tournaments.
The table below summarises the overall performance of the two finalists. Despite the Australian bowling going for runs in the previous game, they have been consistent and dangerous all tournament and their powerful batting order, boosted by the showing of Michael Hussey at No.7, has scored plenty of runs. England have also been superb throughout, with both departments clicking perfectly. Australia seem though to have the slight edge over their opponents as they boast more power hitters in the middle order.
| Team | Matches played | Run-rate | Economy rate | Run-rate difference |
| Australia | 6 | 8.51 | 6.67 | 1.84 |
| England | 6 | 7.97 | 6.68 | 1.29 |
England have been more successful in the Powerplay overs as the stats below suggest. Craig Kieswetter and Michael Lumb have provided superb starts and Kevin Pietersen is in top form leading into the final. Australia's form in the first six overs has tapered off over the last few games with the loss of some early wickets, but the dynamic pair of Shane Watson and David Warner is clearly capable of inflicting serious damage as they did against India.
| Team | Runs scored | Balls faced | Run rate | Wickets lost | Average |
| Australia | 266 | 217 | 7.35 | 11 | 24.18 |
| England | 306 | 216 | 8.50 | 7 | 43.71 |
Australia have been the most dominant batting team in the last six overs. Michael Hussey, who has proved to be the finest finisher, and Cameron White have succeeded in turning matches around with aggressive clean hitting in the slog overs. England have been quite successful too, with the likes of Eoin Morgan and Luke Wright providing good finishes to the innings, but the firepower in this department clearly lies with the Australians.
| Team | Runs scored | Balls faced | Run rate | Wickets lost | Average |
| Australia | 363 | 193 | 11.28 | 15 | 24.20 |
| England | 285 | 184 | 9.29 | 15 | 19.00 |
Australia's pace trio have been quite superb during the Powerplay overs in almost every game they have played. They have picked up regular wickets to leave the opposition reeling and this has been a major factor in their success thus far. England have been quite economical too, but will need to boost their wicket tally to put more pressure on the Australian middle order.
| Team | Runs conceded | Balls bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
| Australia | 225 | 235 | 5.74 | 16 | 14.06 |
| England | 229 | 214 | 6.42 | 9 | 25.44 |
Australia's economy rate during the final overs was dented by some brilliant hitting by Pakistan in the semi-final. Overall, though, their stats are still very impressive as they have been able to pick up 20 wickets in this period. England have been more economical in the final few overs, but in this department there is hardly anything to choose between the sides.
| Team | Runs conceded | Balls bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
| Australia | 221 | 172 | 7.70 | 20 | 11.05 |
| England | 181 | 152 | 7.14 | 14 | 12.92 |
The tables below summarise the performance of the fast bowlers and spinners for both teams. Australia have easily been the finest bowling team, managing to dismiss the opposition on almost every occasion. Dirk Nannes is the leading wicket-taker in the tournament while Steven Smith, the legspinner, has also provided good support to the fast bowlers by picking up regular wickets himself. England's performances in the fast bowling and spin departments stack up pretty well against Australia's, but their wicket taking ability has been slightly inferior.
| Type of bowler | Runs conceded | Balls bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
| Pace | 524 | 467 | 6.73 | 34 | 15.41 |
| Spin | 242 | 204 | 7.11 | 17 | 14.23 |
| Type of bowler | Runs conceded | Balls bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
| Pace | 380 | 320 | 7.12 | 19 | 20.00 |
| Spin | 127 | 108 | 7.05 | 9 | 14.11 |
Perhaps nothing else will delight the Australians more than the fact they will play the final in Barbados. The bouncy track there has helped the Australian attack and their top-class performances on this pitch do not bode well for their opponents. They skittled out a powerful Indian batting line-up and made light work of the Sri Lankan team in their clashes in Bridgetown. The table below shows why the pace trio will be so dangerous on this surface.
| Bowler | Runs conceded | Balls Bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
| Dirk Nannes | 62 | 66 | 5.63 | 9 | 6.88 |
| Shaun Tait | 46 | 58 | 4.75 | 5 | 9.20 |
| Mitchell Johnson | 38 | 38 | 6.00 | 4 | 9.50 |
The decision to play Michael Hussey as an extra batsman at No.7 has proved to be a masterstroke for the Australians. He got them out of trouble with crucial knocks against Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, but those pale in comparison to the stunning 60 off 24 balls in the semi-final against Pakistan. Not only has Hussey played the intelligent game with the singles and twos, he has proved extremely capable of playing the big hits when required. He has scored 156 runs off just 76 balls in the last six overs, with nine sixes and 12 fours. The presence of a genuine match-winner at No. 7 is definitely a huge advantage for Australia going into the final.
| Matches played | Runs scored | Balls faced | Scoring rate | Average |
| 6 | 171 | 97 | 10.57 | 171.00 |
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Now every one expecting this game is gonna be tough for both of the team. But in my opinion, this game will be only one favored, either Australian hand or England hand. But 80% chances are Australian favor because they have batting line up until 8th place while in England squad, only few batsmen play fast format such as Pietersen, Collingwood, and sometimes Lumb or Wright.
Posted by chrisrandom9 on (May 16, 2010, 11:59 GMT)apearce24 they changed it when they authorised my comment. It said 34 before.
Posted by billadeepak on (May 16, 2010, 11:19 GMT)eng definitely will win this match .Kevin Peterson is great playaer and he always loves playing in big matches like he done at the ASHES.Go Eng go .we are waiting for your maiden ICC title.BARMY ARMY will march over aussies
Posted by gloves71 on (May 16, 2010, 10:48 GMT)Don't agree with your comparison that EN and AUS 'have faced off 6 times in major tournaments' - only T20 games are relevant here and they've only played each other once, in which Australia won - but winning one game is hardly proof that AUS have the better of the stats. Whilst I agree that Hussey's innings was truly magnificent, what on earth were Pakistan doing in that final over?!?!? On current form, England will not bow down so meekly.
Posted bynice match to watch rather than pak vs eng.
Posted by cricket702 on (May 16, 2010, 9:08 GMT)@india-da-lund: Heads off to England players :D LOL. I guess you meant, "Hats off".
Posted byThe links in first paragraph are not working (Statistics). There is a double quote (") at the end of the links. Remove that please.
Posted by apearce24 on (May 16, 2010, 2:06 GMT)geez chrisrandom9 Im pretty sure it does say 24 balls mate and Australia will account for the old enemy in a resonably close on.............Com'on Aussie
Posted by india-da-lund on (May 15, 2010, 22:41 GMT)i highly doubt that england will win tomm because austraila is one of the best finisher in the end of the game. but heads off to england players how they are playing at the moment. aussies should not be relaxing too much as u never know but chances are that aussies gonna take the crown tomm.
Posted by CricketingStargazer on (May 15, 2010, 22:34 GMT)So, foregone conclusion. England without a chance? Are we going to bother to play the match if it's already decided?
Or, maybe, we wait and see what happens when the match is actually played...