Matches (33)
AUS vs IND (1)
IND-A vs SA-A (1)
PAK vs SA (1)
QAT vs AFG (1)
Ranji Trophy (19)
Hong Kong Sixes (10)

Report

Gandhi, Kalyani steer Bengal to draw

A third wicket partnership of 108 runs between Devang Gandhi and Srikkanth Kalyani enabled Bengal to draw their Ranji Trophy Super League encounter at the Eden Gardens on Sunday

Sakyasen Mittra
27-Feb-2000
A third wicket partnership of 108 runs between Devang Gandhi and Srikkanth Kalyani enabled Bengal to draw their Ranji Trophy Super League encounter at the Eden Gardens on Sunday. Chasing a victory target of 310 in 46 overs, Bengal finished the day at 180 runs for the loss of five wickets. Earlier, Rajasthan had declared their second innings closed at 216 for the loss of eight wickets. Rajasthan managed five points from the match. Bengal, on the other hand finished with three and their chances of qualifying for the knockout stage now appear slim as they have two tough matches against Karnataka and Mumbai.
It was a day when a number of personal achievements were recorded. Utpal Chatterjee took five wickets in the second innings once more to have match figures of 10 for 160. It was the fourth time that Chatterjee recorded a haul of 10 wickets in a Ranji Trophy game and the 20th time that he had five wickets in an innings. Kalyani became the 27th player and fourth from Bengal to score over 5,000 runs in the Ranji Trophy. When he reached 40, square cutting left arm spinner D.P.Singh, Kalyani had joined the elite ranks of Pankaj Roy, Arun Lal and Ashok Malhotra from Bengal.
Bengal, aspiring for an outright win had two early successes in the day. Skipper Chatterjee sent back Nikhil Doru and off spinner Sourashis Lahiri accounted for Kuldip Singh to have Rajasthan tottering at 96 for 5. However, a sixth wicket stand of 90 between Sanjeev Sharma (54 with seven boundaries) and Saket Bhatia (48, 8x4) dashed their hopes. The partnership was finally broken by Lahiri who had Sharma bowled as the batsman tried to swing him over mid wicket. Shortly afterwards, the Rajasthan skipper Gagan Khoda declared the innings at 216.
When Bengal batted, Sanjeev Sharma had Alokendu Lahiri caught behind and Singh had Rohan Gavaskar caught bat-pad at short leg to have Bengal tottering at 23 for two. But Gandhi and Kalyani with some fine strokes brought things under control. Gandhi had one huge six over mid wicket of Jaykumar and eight boundaries in his 67. Kalyani who got his second fifty of the match also had eight fours in his 56. Most of them came through pleasing drives in the `V' between mid on and mid of. At final draw of stumps Saba Karim (17) and LR Shukla (1) were at the crease.
Full post
India lose first round of the battle

The last day's play in the first Test in Mumbai raised an intriguing question

Anand Vasu
Anand Vasu
26-Feb-2000
The last day's play in the first Test in Mumbai raised an intriguing question. Did South Africa win this game or did India lose it? If one looked carefully at the way the game progressed, the opinion would have to be that India lost the match.
The first battle was lost while selecting the team. The inclusion of Ajay Jadeja at No 6 meant straightaway that India were playing with one player short. Jadeja's record in Test cricket is unimpressive. Moreover, in the Board President's XI game against South Africa, he made scores of 2 and 3. Hardly the kind of scores that warrants Test selection. The non-inclusion of Nikhil Chopra might also have had a bearing on the game as India were clearly one spinner short in the final innings.
India began well, winning the toss. And with that India's good run ended. Batting first, India made just 225 on a track that looked good for batting. The South African pacemen were too hot for everyone in the team save Tendulkar. The captain made a brave 97 but was not backed up by any of his teammates. In response, India did well to restrict the South Africans to 176. Apart from the openers, none of the visitors made runs.
A lead of 49 was quite handy, and far more than the Indians would have hoped for after South Africa were 90 for no loss. What they needed was a solid second innings performance. If they had put between 150 and 170 on the board they could have given South Africa a run for their money. Instead, they collapsed inexplicably. Doing far worse than their first innings, India folded up for just 113 runs. In an all too familiar script, the openers failed, the middle order collapsed and the tail refused to wag. A couple of twitches of the tail came late in the innings when Mongia, batting at No 11, made 19 off just 10 balls. In the middle of all this, the man we knew as Rahul `The Wall' Dravid stuttered and stumbled, making a painful 37 in over three hours. He was totally unable to either score freely or make runs with the tail and one wondered what happened to the young man who made centuries in tough conditions in both New Zealand and South Africa.
Full post
The absence of a third spinner was felt

Hansie Cronje, the South African captain, was not exactly on top of the world when he arrived in India

Woorkheri Raman
26-Feb-2000
Hansie Cronje, the South African captain, was not exactly on top of the world when he arrived in India. He has not been among runs in recent times and added to that there is some uncertainty hanging over his future both as a captain and a player. But not one to be deterred by his ordinary personal form, he was determined to make this trip memorable. One way of making an Indian tour memorable for any visiting captain is by winning the series. Cronje would probably not hesitate to swap a few of his achievements for a victory in the Test series in India. The victory at the Wankhede is bound to relieve Cronje a lot, which might result in him batting better at Bangalore.
Cronje's determination apart, he is supported by his team members to a great extent. The attitude of the entire team is positive and everyone is keen to assume responsibility when it matters. In comparison, Tendulkar does not have many options to look at for support. I had mentioned that the absence of a third spinner would be felt in the fourth innings and it has turned out to be true. Apparently it took the collective wisdom of seven people (five selectors plus the captain and the coach) to pick the final eleven and yet the balance of the team was ignored. Six batsmen along with a keeper and four bowlers is not the ideal combination to win a Test match. Because of the fact that it has failed time and again, adherence to the same formula is inexplicable.
On the other hand, the presence of six batsmen has not made a major difference to the totals put up by the Indians, be it Mumbai or Melbourne. It is unanimously agreed that there are not that many all-rounders available, but potential all-rounders like Nikhil Chopra have to be encouraged. He can bat a bit and is a steady spinner with a very good attitude. At an age when he should be playing, there is no point in keeping him as a reserve on pitches that assist spinners. In contrast, Cronje, reading the track well, played two spinners, though he would not have expected them to run through the Indian batting line up. I am not suggesting the Indians ape the visiting captain but the term "horses for courses" comes to mind.
The South Africans won the Test at the Wankhede through sheer mental strength. Gibbs once again provided a good start along with Kirsten, which in retrospect proved to be very crucial. Kallis, the superb cricketer that he is, showed great patience and maturity to stay till the end. Boucher, just a few seasons old in international cricket, has the distinction of having many records under his belt. That sweet little innings of his proved that with a positive attitude, one could overwhelm any pressure situation.
Full post

Showing 41511 - 41520 of 42184