Matches (16)
IPL (4)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
WT20 QUAD (in Thailand) (2)
OMA-W vs BAH-W (1)
CZE-W vs CYP-W (1)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Stats Analysis

Waugh's Houdini act

A look at the best batting, bowling, allround, and team performances of the 1999 World Cup

Steve Waugh celebrates leading his team into the semi-finals, Australia v South Africa, Super Sixes, Headingley, June 13, 1999

Steve Waugh's unbeaten 120 against South Africa in the super-six stage was the best innings of the 1999 World Cup.  •  Getty Images

A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.

The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.

The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.

The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.

The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.

Let us move on to the Performance Analysis tables for 1999.

Top Batting performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Batsman For VsRuns Balls
1 53319991463SC Ganguly India Slk183 158
2 46319991481SR Waugh Australia Saf120*110
3 44519991477NC Johnson Zimbabwe Aus132*144
4 40019991463R Dravid India Slk145 129
5 38419991482Saeed Anwar Pakistan Nzl113*148
6 36019991473A Jadeja India Aus100*138
7 32519991453GM Hamilton Scotland Pak 76 111
8 31819991479Saeed Anwar Pakistan Zim103 144
9 31619991457SR Tendulkar India Ken140*101
10 30119991484AC Gilchrist Australia Pak 54 36

There is no doubt that Steve Waugh's 120 was the most important innings of the World Cup. However Sourav Ganguly's huge innings of 183 takes the top place. There is a clear reason. This was against another top-eight Test team, not a minnow. And the Sri Lankan team had Muttiah Muralitharan and Chaminda Vaas. Then comes Waugh's masterpiece, one of the best World Cup innings ever. In third place is Neil Johnson's outstanding effort against Australia, albeit in a losing cause.

Rahul Dravid's huge hundred against Sri Lanka, appears next. This played the supporting role to Ganguly's effort. Saeed Anwar's hundred which took Pakistan to an easy win over New Zealand, is in fifth place. Ajay Jadeja's hundred deserves a special mention since he and Robin Singh scored over 85% of the Indian total. No one else crossed 8.

Top Bowling performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Bowler For VsAnalysis
1 53219991483SK Warne Australia Saf10.0 - 4 - 29 - 4
2 49619991476BKV Prasad India Pak 9.3 - 2 - 27 - 5
3 48519991483SM Pollock South Africa Aus 9.2 - 1 - 36 - 5
4 45719991470GD McGrath Australia Win 8.4 - 3 - 14 - 5
5 40919991455AA Donald South Africa Eng 8.0 - 1 - 17 - 4
6 40819991452GI Allott New Zealand Aus10.0 - 0 - 37 - 4
7 40719991484SK Warne Australia Pak 9.0 - 1 - 33 - 4
8 40219991483AA Donald South Africa Aus10.0 - 1 - 32 - 4
9 34119991463Robin Singh India Slk 9.3 - 0 - 31 - 5
10 33519991458Wasim Akram Pakistan Aus 9.5 - 1 - 40 - 4

Shane Warne's semi-final effort against South Africa, hailed by many as one of the greatest spin-bowling spells in World Cups, deservedly stands at the top. Conceding fewer than 3 runs per over and picking up four top wickets does not happen every other day. This is followed by Venkatesh Prasad's match-winning spell against Pakistan. Four of these were those of top batsmen.

Shaun Pollock's top-class spell of 5 for 36 should have won the match but for bizarre happenings in the last over of the South African innings. Glenn McGrath destroyed West Indies for 110, with an amazing spell of 5 for 14. This spell was almost a carbon copy of the Allan Donald spell which gave South Africa a huge 122 run win over England, after scoring only 225.

Top Player performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Player For Vs Runs Balls Analysis
1 58919991477NC Johnson Zimbabwe Aus132*144 8.0-0-43-2
2 58019991468NC Johnson Zimbabwe Saf 76 117 8.0-1-27-3
3 48719991453GM Hamilton Scotland Pak 76 11110.0-1-36-2
4 37619991473Robin Singh India Aus 75 94 7.0-0-43-2
5 37619991451L Klusener South Africa Slk 52* 45 5.2-1-21-3
6 37219991478JH Kallis South Africa Nzl 53* 36 6.0-2-15-2
7 35419991464TM Moody Australia Bng 56* 2910.0-4-25-3
8 34819991483JH Kallis South Africa Aus 53 9210.0-2-27-1
9 33819991445NC Johnson Zimbabwe Ken 59 7010.0-0-42-4
10 33519991467SC Ganguly India Eng 40 59 8.0-0-27-3

Neil Johnson's batting effort has already been talked about. He had also captured the wickets of the Australian openers. This is the best player performance of 1999. Gavin Hamilton's all-round performance of 76 and 2 wickets was against a much stronger opponent. That too in a winning cause.

Robin Singh's performance was against Australia and I have already touched on the same. It is interesting to note that three of the top performances have been in losing causes.

Then come two South African all-rounders. Lance Klusener against Sri Lanka and Jacques Kallis against New Zealand. Each had a good fifty and a few overs of economical bowling.

Top Team performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Team Own score Vs Other score
1 85919991484Australia 133 for 2 in 20.1Pak132 for 10 in 39.0
2 72119991455South Africa 225 for 7 in 50.0Eng103 for 10 in 41.0
3 70619991482Pakistan 242 for 1 in 47.3Nzl241 for 7 in 50.0
4 70419991471Bangladesh 223 for 9 in 50.0Pak161 for 10 in 44.3
5 69619991479Pakistan 271 for 9 in 50.0Zim123 for 10 in 40.3
6 68219991465West Indies 70 for 2 in 10.1Sco68 for 10 in 31.3
7 67719991463India 373 for 6 in 50.0Slk216 for 10 in 42.3
8 67319991476India 227 for 6 in 50.0Pak180 for 10 in 45.3
9 67319991467India 232 for 8 in 50.0Eng169 for 10 in 45.2
10 66719991468Zimbabwe 233 for 6 in 50.0Saf185 for 10 in 47.2

Australian demolition of Pakistan in the final was one of the greatest team performances in World Cups. This win gathered 859 points and it is very difficult to overtake this. Every department worked very well. Even the chase was performed quickly and efficiently. This is followed by South African dismantling of England, who did not even reach half the South African total.

In the semi-final Pakistan was nearly as ruthless against New Zealand as Australia were against them a few days later. The chase of a good total was perfect. Bangladesh's upset win over Pakistan ranks next. It was also a big win. Finally the non-contest between West Indies and Scotland appears in the fifth position.

This was a very odd World Cup. Look at the following happenings during the World Cup.
- India lost to Zimbabwe by 3 runs.
- South Africa lost to Zimbabwe by 48 runs.
- Pakistan lost to Bangladesh by 62 runs.
- Steve Waugh deliberately dawdled for over 40 overs to score 111, so that Australia's opponent, West Indies could qualify instead of New Zealand and so that Australia could carry over 2 more points. Looks like I have been imbibing the brown liquor. No I have not. This is true. Ultimately West Indies did not qualify and Australia won.
- The semi final match between Australia and South Australia ended in a tie and Australia qualified.
- Two of the teams were at a full-scale war in real life.

But the bottom line was that Australia could not afford to lose a single match from a certain point, they did not and won the World Cup. All credit to them. However one wonders what would have happened if an Asian team had dawdled for 40 overs deliberately.

The match of the tournament has to be a toss-up between Australia's steam-rolling Pakistan in the final and Zimbabwe's 48-run win over South Africa. The final would probably have to be given the nod because of the way Australia dominated the match and came out well in an event where they were not at their best. They finished the World Cup in a dominating manner which was a portent to their total domination in the next two World Cups.
The innings of the World Cup was Steve Waugh's magnificent 120 in 110 balls in the key super-six match against South Africa. Finito, it would have been if Australia had lost the match.
The bowling spell of 1999 has to be the Warne-special in the semi-final. He dismissed Gary Kirsten, Herschelle Gibbs, Hansie Cronje and Kallis for 29 runs in a magnificent exhibition of spin bowling to help Australia tie the match and go through to the final and beyond.

Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems