England: ECB facing a second legal fight with sacked receptionist (16 October 1998)
THE England and Wales Cricket Board are facing further legal action from Theresa Harrild, the former receptionist who in March won a claim for sexual discrimination against the ECB at the Industrial Tribunal
16-Oct-1998
16 October 1998
England: ECB facing a second legal fight with sacked receptionist
By Mihir Bose
THE England and Wales Cricket Board are facing further legal
action from Theresa Harrild, the former receptionist who in March
won a claim for sexual discrimination against the ECB at the
Industrial Tribunal.
In a High Court writ issued yesterday Harrild claims damages from
the ECB for alleged libel and breach of contract. She alleges
that there has been a breach of terms agreed in May in settlement
of her libel complaint that remarks made by Tim Lamb, chief
executive of the ECB, in the days that followed the tribunal
verdict suggested she was a liar. Under that settlement she was
paid damages described at the time as "substantial".
Harrild's latest legal action has been prompted by an interview
given by Medha Laud, international administrator of the board, in
the October issue of Wisden Cricket Monthly. Harrild has cited
the magazine and Laud as co-defendants in her libel action.
The Harrild affair, which has already cost the ECB several tens
of thousands of pounds in compensation and legal costs, could now
involve considerable further expense and, given that cricket is
pleading poverty, it raises fresh questions about how the whole
issue has been handled.
At the Industrial Tribunal hearing Harrild, who had been employed
as a £14,000 per annum receptionist, described how she had been
made pregnant by a colleague, whom she did not name but who was
later identified as Nick Marriner, in charge of youth cricket.
After she confided in her immediate superior she was summoned to
see Lamb, who allegedly told her that she was a bright girl but
would not be considered for promotion if she had children and
urged her to make up her mind about the pregnancy. When Harrild
said she did not have the cash for an abortion and it would take
weeks on the NHS, Lamb allegedly said he would have a word with
Cliff Barker, the deputy chief executive and chief finance man of
the ECB.
Barker allegedly told Harrild that the ECB would pay for the
abortion. She was put up by the board at a Regents Park hotel and
the day after her abortion paid £400. Barker then visited her at
her home in Blackheath and allegedly told her she was being
dismissed and offered £1,000 and additional unspecified sums to
be a "good girl".
Harrild also told the tribunal how Lamb referred to some women
cricketers as 'dykes' and how it would be useful to have them on
board to get Lottery money.
Christopher Carstairs, the tribunal chairman, ruled in Harrild's
favour saying: "The tribunal is unanimous in finding Miss
Harrild's evidence was truthful".
The ECB were not represented at the tribunal but gave written
evidence instead.
Lamb, in an interview after the Industrial Tribunal's verdict,
denied the ECB was a sexist organisation saying: "We are proud of
being a fair and caring employer, we have a very good record of
staff loyalty."
He then went on to comment on the allegations made by Harrild.
This led to Harrild's first libel complaint against the ECB and
this was quickly settled.
In a statement jointly issued with Harrild's solicitors, Lord
MacLaurin, chairman of the ECB, expressed "sincere regret" to
Harrild for any distress caused by the "subsequent press
statements". He assured her that "the ECB had no intention of
suggesting that she had done other than provide an honest
recollection of events to the industrial tribunal."
The joint statement also confirmed that the ECB had agreed to pay
Harrild a "substantial sum" and her legal costs. Neither party
had any further comment to make.
The current issue of Wisden Cricket Monthly, described as the
women's issue and designed to coincide with the MCC vote to admit
women, includes an interview with Medha Laud. Laud, asked about
the Harrild case, made various comments and it is one of these
that is alleged to have again libelled Harrild.
Through their solicitors, the ECB have disclaimed any
responsibility for the Laud interview. They claim she granted the
interview after being personally contacted by a WCM journalist.
Laud, who has now had to hire her own lawyer, claims that in the
WCM interview she was seeking to give a general impression of the
office environment at the ECB and how it affected women like her.
Christopher Lane, managing director of Wisden Cricket Monthly,
said: "We have received a complaint from solicitors instructed by
Theresa Harrild which refer to an interview we published with
Medha Laud in the October issue of Wisden Cricket Monthly and in
the interview she comments on the ECB office environment. It is
being claimed that her words as published inferred that Teresa
Harrild had lied to the Industrial Tribunal.
"It was never Medha's or our intention to give any such
impression at all and our solicitors have drawn Ms Harrild's
attention to the fact that the words their client complained of
must be read in the context of the article as a whole."
He added: "As soon as we received Ms Harrild's complaint we
instructed our solicitors to write to Ms Harrild's solicitors
that we are ready to make this clear and apologise if any such
inference has been drawn."
Richard Peel, corporate affairs director of the ECB, declined to
comment.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)