Indian eves doubly determined in the wake of throwing controversy
Cricket is played as much in the mind as in the body
Anand Vasu
08-Dec-2000
Cricket is played as much in the mind as in the
body. The Australians, people say are the best
side in the business. Perhaps this is so true only
because of the fact that they play the mind games
better than most. Unfortunately, it is not only in
the field of tactics, planning and psychology. The
Australians have always been the world leaders
when it comes to sledging. Another more alarming
trend is the campaign that sections of the
Australian media and the think tank undertake
before a major tour takes place.
In 1995-96, Sri Lanka were to tour Australia.
Before the visitors had left their island, the
campaign against Muthiah Muralitharan began. His
action was under immense scrutiny and his
confidence shattered before he could actually roll
his arm over. In 1998-99, England went to
Australia to battle for the Ashes. Mike Atherton
was termed Glen McGrath's bunny and was forced on
the back foot before the first ball was delivered.
In early 1999-2000, Pakistan toured Australia.
Their bowling weapon, Shoiab Akhtar was trashed
even as he was warming up and raring to go. In the
same tour, Brett Lee was unscathed though his
action bore a great similarity to Akhtar's. Later
the same year, the Indians went to Australia. At
that time Sachin Tendulkar was the man targeted.
The Australians apparently had discovered a gaping
hole in the star batsman's technique. As it turned
out, he averaged 46.00 in that series. Most
recently, in a tour that is still under way, the
Aussies have gone after Brian Lara. In all these
instances, with the comfort of retrospection, many
of the Australian prophecies indeed did come true.
That their tactics might have contributed to this
happening is undoubtable.
What is doubly saddening is the fact that even the
women's game has not been spared. In the ongoing
CricInfo Women's World Cup, India won the first
three matches they played, beating even the
fancied South African and England sides. They took
on Australia and lost. Soon after, the Australian
management complained to the tournament organisers
about the legality of bowling actions of two
bowlers - mediumpacer Renu Margrate and offspinner
Purnima Rau. While Margrate's action has always
been less than smooth, Rau's action has never been
under any doubt. The experienced campaigner made
her debut way back in the 1970s. She has toured
both England and New Zealand before and never has
she been no-balled for throwing. Rau has played
World Cups before and again there was no problem.
Now that India are emerging as a force to reckon
with in the CricInfo Women's World Cup, doubts are
being raised. Mere coincidence?
The Australian think tank will have us believe so.
Speaking to CricInfo in New Zealand, the
Australian team management said, "It was not even
in the list of things to be discussed. They (the
media) have blown it up too much. We knew of this
only after watching the TV." Given Australia's
history with tactics of this kind, their
detractors will never be sure.
The Indian team however, is not amused in the
least at the latest developments. They would
dearly like to concentrate on the cricket and
leave all the controversy behind. With India
through to the semifinals, they will face either
Australia or New Zealand. If current form is
anything to go by, the probability of India
playing Australia at some stage is very likely.
Speaking to this correspondent from New Zealand,
Sudha Shah, the cricketing manager of the team,
said "We are behind our players and believe that
there is nothing wrong with their actions. If
anything, the allegations made against us have
made us more determined. We are very keen to do
well and win the CricInfo Women's World Cup. What
has happen will make us work harder, focus and
beat teams like Australia and New Zealand."
When it comes to grey areas like legality of
bowling actions, it is always wise to tread
carefully. With umpires and special committees
being in charge of such situations, the media
would be best served by waiting and watching. That
clearly has not happened in this case. All parties
involved feel that the media has blown this matter
out of proportion. The sad part is, the newspapers
have sold their copies, the web sites have got
their hits and it is only the players and the game
that suffers.