We have to take it one game at a time - Chappell
Not having won since the opening match of the Caribbean tour, Chappell reckoned that the remaining two matches represented a great opportunity to get back to the winning ways of last season
Dileep Premachandran in Kuala Lumpur
19-Sep-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
Though the permutations suggest that India can afford to lose to West
Indies and still make Sunday's final, Greg Chappell wasn't prepared to
rely on them in the build-up to Wednesday's game. Not having won since the
opening match of the Caribbean tour, Chappell reckoned that the remaining
two matches represented a great opportunity to get back to the winning
ways of last season, when the team had brushed aside the likes of Sri
Lanka, Pakistan and England.
"We've two very important matches that we have to do well in and will have
quite a few of those over the next few months," he said. "We are focused
on tomorrow's game and then we will be concerned about the next one. If we
start looking too far ahead, we'll make mistakes. We have to go out and
put together a good performance in this first game then worry about the
next one."
Having lost to West Indies on the Duckworth-Lewis method, India collapsed
in a heap in the face of a revised target against Australia before the
rain came down to gift them two points. Chappell, though, wasn't too
disheartened by the displays, preferring instead to focus on the
positives. "I thought it was a good comeback [against Australia], I
thought we bowled quite well early but the Australians played well," he
said. "It's a good sign that we regrouped and were able to contain them.
But in the half-games that we had, we batted well in the first game and
bowled well in the second game, so those are good signs."
Though West Indies are already certain of a place in the final, Chappell
refused to underestimate the threat that they would pose. "They've got a lot
of talent in that team," he said. "You've had some of their key players
perform very well yesterday. Any team that has key players performing will
do well. There is not much difference between the top six or seven teams.
On a given day, anyone is capable of beating anyone else."
Much of his own team's concerns centre around Irfan Pathan, whose bowling
against West Indies was so woeful that the new-ball was given to Munaf
Patel for the following game against Australia. "He [Pathan] has bowled better,
there is no doubt about that," said Chappell. "For him to get better, he
has to try different things and look at different roles in the team.
That's not to say that he won't come back and open the bowling at some
stage in this tournament.
"We've probably got a few players who are not at their peak at the moment.
And as I've said before, you won't have everybody in their best form at
the same time. Cricket teams go through that, players go through that. If
you look at any team, you see similar things. It's a bit of a concern but
it's not something we're losing sleep over at this stage."
He also defended the decision to move Virender Sehwag down the order,
saying that it was part of the strategy to try out various options ahead
of the World Cup. "We're using bowlers in different positions, we're using
batters in different positions, all to try and develop the team to become
more versatile."
Despite West Indies making short work of a competitive Australia total in
the last game, Chappell was of the opinion that batting first remained the
best option in these conditions. "It can change once we see the pitch, but
conventional wisdom suggests that batting first in a day-night game is
good," he said. "We're quite happy batting first if we win the toss."
They piled up 309 when they did so in the last encounter against West
Indies. But with the bowling, Patel apart, looking increasingly pop-gun,
even that wasn't enough against Chris Gayle and Brian Lara in rampant mood. Chappell
and his team can only hope that they're due for a reversal of fortune, and
quickly.
Dileep Premachandran is features editor of Cricinfo