S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Mumbai best among equals ... so far

Mumbai have lost only a third of the wickets that their bowlers have taken, which shows how dominant they've been in the first two weeks of IPL 2011

S Rajesh

April 22, 2011

Comments: 17 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar and Ambati Rayudu celebrate Mumbai Indians' win, Royal Challengers Bangalore v Mumbai Indians, IPL 2011, Bangalore, April 12, 2011
Ambati Rayudu and Sachin Tendulkar have ensured there have been few hiccups for Mumbai's batsmen in the first part of this year's IPL © AFP
Enlarge

It's still fairly early days in IPL 2011, but one team has clearly set the early benchmarks: Mumbai Indians have won three games extremely convincingly, and with Sachin Tendulkar and Lasith Malinga leading their batting and bowling, they, quite clearly, have the best numbers in the tournament so far.

Mumbai are joint leaders in the points table with six, and are one of only two teams to have lost one match so far. Kings XI Punjab have the same win-loss record and points, but in terms of batting and bowling numbers Mumbai are well clear of all sides, though Punjab have surprised many with their resurgence after a poor start. Other teams have scored more runs at a faster rate, but that's only because Mumbai's bowlers have ensured their batsmen don't have to do a lot. In their three wins so far, they've chased targets of 96, 141, and 119. They allowed Pune Warriors to get closer than they should have in their last match, but Mumbai have still lost only eight wickets in IPL 2011, and only four of their batsmen have been dismissed so far. Andrew Symonds has faced only 15 deliveries so far, while Rohit Sharma has played 48.

Overall, Mumbai's bowlers have taken three times the number of wickets their team has lost with the bat, which is why their bowling average is so much better than their batting one. That also means the difference between their batting index (batting average multiplied by runs scored per ball) and their bowling index (bowling average multiplied by runs conceded per ball) is easily the highest among all teams - in fact, it's almost seven times the value of the next-best side.

Kolkata are that team, thanks largely to their wonderfully disciplined bowling unit, which has accounted for 30 wickets (excluding run-outs), the most by any team in the tournament so far. No side has touched 160 against them, and they also bowled out Rajasthan Royals for 81, the lowest total of this IPL and the third-lowest in all IPL matches. The Kolkata bowlers' combined economy rate of 6.92 runs per over is also the lowest by any bowling unit in the tournament so far. The difference between the two indices for them is 6.69 - considerably lower than Mumbai's, but far better than any other side. In fact, Punjab and Chennai Super Kings are the only other side whose difference between the batting and bowling index is greater than zero.

At the other end of the table are Royal Challengers Bangalore and Delhi Daredevils, two teams which have struggled for form and momentum. Both teams were among the top contenders in the last couple of years, but this year the batting and bowling have been problem areas. Only a couple of players from both teams have topped 100 runs - David Warner and Venugopal Rao for Delhi, and AB de Villiers and Virat Kohli for Bangalore - while their two star openers have largely been flops so far - Virender Sewhag for Delhi and Tillakaratne Dilshan for Bangalore. The bowling for both teams have been poor too, with averages exceeding 40 and the economy rates touching eight.

Teams in IPL 2011 with bat and ball
Team Runs scored/wkts lost Bat ave/ SR Ave x SR/100 (I1) Wkts taken Bowl ave/ER Ave x ER/6 (I2) I1-I2
Mumbai Indians 507/ 8 63.37/ 111.92 70.92 24 21.54/ 6.98 25.06 45.86
Kolkata Knight Riders 641/ 23 27.86/ 115.08 32.06 30 22.00/ 6.92 25.37 6.69
Kings XI Punjab 624/ 21 29.71/ 133.90 39.78 22 27.50/ 8.26 37.86 1.92
Chennai Super Kings 640/ 17 37.64/ 138.22 52.03 18 35.33/ 8.57 50.46 1.57
Pune Warriors 534/ 24 22.25/ 126.84 28.22 22 25.31/ 7.02 29.61 -1.39
Deccan Chargers 769/ 33 23.30/ 127.52 29.71 24 30.75/ 7.64 39.16 -9.45
Kochi Tuskers Kerala 716/ 25 28.64/ 126.50 36.23 20 36.35/ 7.69 46.59 -10.36
Rajasthan Royals 637/ 27 23.59/ 113.54 26.78 22 32.40/ 7.72 41.69 -14.91
Royal Challengers Bangalore 561/ 24 23.37/ 117.61 27.49 16 40.81/ 8.31 56.52 -29.03
Delhi Daredevils 552/ 30 18.40/ 119.22 21.94 14 42.00/ 7.80 54.60 -32.66
All stats include only runs off the bat, and wickets taken are those by bowlers only.

No.4 on top

It's the fourth edition of the IPL, and quite fittingly, batsmen at the No.4 slot have had a pretty enjoyable time in the tournament so far. In 40 innings, they've averaged almost 38, which is comfortably the highest among batsmen in all slots, at a strike rate of 123.

The openers have obviously scored a huge chunk of fifties and hundreds - they've managed two hundreds and 16 fifties - but the two-down batsmen have acquitted themselves very well too, with fifties for Virat Kohli, AB de Villiers, S Badrinath, Yuvraj Singh and Bharat Chipli. Manoj Tiwary hasn't scored a fifty, but he has an aggregate of 133 runs at No.4, at an average of 66.50.

Stats by batting position in IPL 2011 so far
Position Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Openers 88 2427 29.96 122.36 2/ 16
No.3 44 1112 30.05 123.96 0/ 6
No.4 42 1019 37.74 123.36 0/ 5
No.5 36 593 20.44 118.83 0/ 1
No.6 31 499 22.68 136.71 0/ 1
No.7 21 288 22.15 123.60 0/ 1

In terms of partnerships, though, the one for the second wicket has been the most prolific so far, with the average touching 39 at a rate of almost eight. Of the six century stands in this IPL, three have been for the third wicket. The highest partnership of this IPL has also been for the second wicket, when Gautam Gambhir and Jacques Kallis added an undefeated 152 for Kolkata against Rajasthan. Tendulkar and Rayudu have also done their bit to boost the average for the second wicket with two century stands, against Kochi and Bangalore.

Partnership stats for each wicket in IPL 2011
Wicket Innings Runs Average stand Run rate 100/ 50 p'ships
First 44 1306 29.68 7.78 2/ 8
Second 44 1585 37.73 7.73 3/ 10
Third 42 1167 32.41 7.64 1/ 6
Fourth 36 762 23.09 7.42 0/ 4
Fifth 31 829 36.04 8.59 0/ 4
Sixth 21 420 22.10 9.03 0/ 1

The Tendulkar-Rayudu pair is also the prolific in IPL 2011 so far, with a tally of 330 runs and an average stand of 110 per dismissal. The next three pairs that follow them are all those that bat at the top of the order. The leaders among them are the Adam Gilchrist-Paul Valthaty combination: in three innings they've put together partnerships of 61 (versus Chennai), 136 (against Deccan) and 67 (versus Rajasthan).

In fact, the top four teams have a pair each in the first four slots, which shows the importance of a strong top order to the fortunes of a team. That's all the more reason for Delhi and Bangalore to hope that Sehwag and Dilshan perform to potential. If they do, both these teams could make a strong comeback in a tournament that so far hasn't gone according to plan for them.

Most prolific pairs in the IPL so far
Pair Innings Runs Average stand Run rate 100/ 50 stands
Ambati Rayudu - Sachin Tendulkar (Mumbai) 4 330 110.00 7.79 2/ 1
Adam Gilchrist - Paul Valthaty (Punjab) 3 264 88.00 10.92 1/ 2
Mahela Jayawardene - Brendon McCullum (Kochi) 4 229 57.25 8.22 1/ 0
Gautam Gambhir - Jacques Kallis (Kolkata) 2 191 191.00 8.95 1/ 0
Brad Hodge - Ravindra Jadeja (Kochi) 4 164 82.00 9.55 0/ 1

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by skepticaloptimist on (April 23, 2011, 12:07 GMT)

@Rajeev - I am a KKR supporter, but I am rather disgusted at your thinking. We don't have a strong opening pair unless Haddin or Gauti open with Kallis. I want to see strong, competitive cricket, and teams playing at their full strength. MI have deserved what they have achieved. I hope they would be able to solve their three main issues: fouth overseas player; SRT's opening partner, and R Sathish. And KKR can just manage their resources better. RCB have a capricious opening pair. With the attitude that Dilshan is employing, he's a liability on the team. Pujara should open with Gayle. I feel CSK have the best opening pair so far - with both stability and explosiveness.

Posted by   on (April 23, 2011, 11:46 GMT)

Yeah,MI looked the same formidable team in IPL3....Everyone said that they would win....But what happened in the final.....They surrendered to the CSK....MI is always an over-estimated team...

Posted by Rajeev129 on (April 23, 2011, 10:32 GMT)

On paper their batting looks strong but not as stronger as RCB / KKR. So there is no question that why cant they lose the matches.

Without MALINGA Mumbai Indians are definitely an average team, i am hoping that he will be injured in this IPL at some stage and that will lead to permanent rejection by Sri Lankan Cricket board, who are indirectly telling him to quit the IPL.

Posted by soumyas on (April 23, 2011, 9:49 GMT)

1) Mumbai team doesn't give more opportunities to youngsters, too many big players in team and they never let youngsters take opportunity. 2) Everytimes Sachin bats taking most of the strike, so the explossive batsmen like Pollard,symmonds get less chances to show their batting, they become unused resources. the day they lost when sachin scorred century they cud hav scored well over 200, but they managed 180's on flat track and lost. 3) players like Sharma,Symmonds are match winners, too many match winners in mumbai team, i think Sharma,Symmonds shud have been in team like Deccan and Delhi which have weak batting line up. so making it even contest between teams. 4) look at Punjab team they have discovered Valthaty, Deccan descovered Bharat Chipli, and see how shane warne groom youngsters and give them the best chance to show their skills. tendulkar,pollard,malinga,bhajji were enough....

Posted by Sidthoughtworks on (April 23, 2011, 8:44 GMT)

Nice analysis, Rajesh!! However, Mumbai is the only team that has looked vulnerable while defending their total. It would be interesting to look at their average without Malinga or Harbhajan, along with the strike rates. That may be the reason they lost to Kochi, when Malinga went for runs...

Posted by VinodKambli on (April 23, 2011, 4:06 GMT)

Sachin,

Mumbai Ranji team are not extras for IPL 3 and IPL 4. If u treat the Mumbai Ranji players this way, the day will come "You will be extra or at the corner"

Every state or city should give chance to local ranji team players.

Posted by sandeep6900 on (April 22, 2011, 22:02 GMT)

I don't like IPL. I have love and respect when our Indian team is playing as a whole with other nations. Teams having foreign players and atleast the local players not playing for thier local teams- like Laxman for Hyd, Gambhir for Delhi... sad!

Posted by InsideHedge on (April 22, 2011, 21:03 GMT)

Valthaty has a chance in the Indian T-20 team but he doesn't look comfortable against pure pace. Then again, how many times would he have faced someone like Steyn and Tait. The exposure that he's getting in the IPL is only going to help him and the Indian team in the long run.

Lots of promising batters such as Rayudu, Trivedi, Vijay etc. However, there is a distinct lack of promising bowlers. There doesn't appear to be much competition for the pacers in the Indian team.

There's some promising spinners such as Ali Murtaza and Rahul Sharma. I'd like to see seamer Abu Nechim progress at the First Class level too. Will these players be prepared to slog it out in FC cricket in front of 5 spectators when they've experienced the thrill of T20 in India?

Posted by Cricket_BornForIt on (April 22, 2011, 20:47 GMT)

@Krishna -- I do not agree with you at all. Mumbai is only team where 90% of time top four are all Indian, despite u having likes of Symonds and Pollard. I always feel Saching is the only captain who gives Indian's more chance.

All teams with foreign captains will have all International Players getting maximum exposure. Think about it. If you see last year also Sachin always gave preference too Rayudu, Tiwary, satish

Posted by   on (April 22, 2011, 14:22 GMT)

Mumbai unlike other teams do not give opportunity to budding young mumbai players and except Rohit no one plays for mumbai ranji team. I am not including "GOD"in the ranji team. This is unfair to local players where every team plays atleast four local players in the team.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Catch dodgy actions early

Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level

    Reorganising West Indies' first-class structure is only half the battle won

Tony Cozier: Pitches, umpiring, and practice facilities must be simultaneously improved

    Trading places

All Out Cricket: In a world where £50m can be staked on a single IPL game, armies of professional cricket traders work the betting markets. But who are these people?

The set-up

The Cricket Monthly: When Tony Greig was outwitted by Ashley Mallett
Download the app: for iPad | for Android tablet

A method to rate the dominance of Test teams

Kartikeya Date: Taking into account margin of victory and draws, while eliminating arbitrary decay in setting cut-off limits

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

85 Tests, 70 defeats

Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

News | Features Last 7 days