Matches (15)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
IPL (2)
PSL (3)
Women's One-Day Cup (1)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
USA-W vs ZIM-W (1)

IPL Inbox

Give us raw emotion, stripped of commercialisation

By Indra Chakraborty, USA

Nikita Bastian
Nikita Bastian
25-Feb-2013
By Indra Chakraborty, USA
As I watched Sourav Ganguly’s instinctual celebrations after he had cleaned up Kevin Pietersen on Saturday, I realised for the first time I was paying the game my full, undivided attention. I was fascinated to see whether Dada would be able to conjure up another win for his team, the blue shades of Pune Warriors’ kit reminiscent of the colours of the national team he had led not too many summers ago. Not the cheerleaders, not the frills, but pure cricketing emotion, stripped naked of all commercialisation, caught my attention. Is this what the IPL needs to be relevant ten years from now?
As ratings for the mega-extravaganza continue to dip, it doesn't need Twenty20 mercenaries showing up for the various franchises. It doesn't need Navjot Sidhu's poetry coupled with the on-cue gyrations of cheerleaders in the pre-match show studio. What the IPL needs is that raw emotion, like that showcased by Ganguly in Delhi. And this is something that can't be bought at an auction.
Full post
Owais Shah for World T20?

By Ewan Day-Collins, United Kingdom

Cricinfo
25-Feb-2013
By Ewan Day-Collins, United Kingdom
Owais Shah is a man blessed with talent. Some, however, believe it has been largely wasted throughout his career. A career, some say, defined by failure to grab international opportunities has been a waste.
With this IPL, though, Shah is impressively returning. Similar to how Michael Lumb opened the batting for the Rajasthan Royals back in 2010 – demonstrating power and consistency – Shah is performing with versatility and reliability. Lumb earned an England T20 call-up: eventually forming a tournament-conquering partnership with Craig Kieswetter at the World T20 in the West Indies.
Full post
How good is the IPL as a TV product?

By Aamod Desai, India ‘… And it’s time for the strategic time-out,’ the commentator says only to reappear – or rather, only to be reheard – about five seconds short of 2.5 minutes as the crowd at the ground counts down those seconds on the ticker

Nikita Bastian
Nikita Bastian
25-Feb-2013
By Aamod Desai, India ‘… And it’s time for the strategic time-out,’ the commentator says only to reappear – or rather, only to be reheard – about five seconds short of 2.5 minutes as the crowd at the ground counts down those seconds on the ticker. In between we have all the brands who have affiliated with the IPL promoting their products.
Cricket is probably the only sport that allows its advertisers so much live airtime, and the broadcaster often attempts to squeeze out every second possible for his investors. There’s nothing wrong with the advertiser or the broadcaster trying to maximise his potential gains.
During the current season, we have had two outstanding high-scoring ‘afternoon’ games, involving teams chasing down big totals (CSK v RCB and RR v DC), followed by the second game of that day. In between, the broadcaster manages to fit in only the post-match presentation and two-three minutes of packaged highlights; for a TV viewer this is too short a time to recollect the match that has transpired, especially when it’s a cracker of a match like those big chases.
Full post
Royal Challengers' fifth bowler problem

By Aashish Calla, India

Cricinfo
25-Feb-2013
By Aashish Calla, India
Over the last two matches that the Royal Challengers Bangalore have played in IPL 2012, and lost, it has become clear that despite having four international bowlers (and good ones at that) in their playing XI, it's the fifth bowler that has lost them both games. Look at these stats below: Vs Chennai Super Kings: Fifth bowler – Virat Kohli + Raju Bhatkal, gave away 71 runs in four overs, wicket-less. Vs Rajasthan Royals: Fifth bowler – S Aravind + Chris Gayle, gave away 69 runs in four overs, wicket-less. That's an average of 17.75 and 17.25 runs per over, respectively, which, as Daniel Vettori also said, is "unacceptable".
The other bowlers in the Royals game gave away 121 runs in 16 overs, which is an economy-rate of less than eight, quite acceptable. Going by this, Royals would have ended up scoring slightly less than 160 had the fifth bowler maintained a similar RPO. But the fact that they leaked 69 runs there meant that the score sky-rocketed to 195, which in the end proved unassailable. It was a similar situation with the Super Kings game.
Full post
Time to implement rotation policy?

By Sriraj GS, Australia

Cricinfo
25-Feb-2013
By Sriraj GS, Australia
There was recently an article in the Inbox about allowing five foreign players in the IPL by Karan Mamgain. While it generated the usual heated debate in the feedback section, one particular comment by 'cricsavvy' caught my eye - how about implementing a rotation policy? Going through the pros and cons discussed in the feedback, one does feel four is a justified cap on the number of foreign players. However, using a cap in the form of a rotation policy can also be another way at looking to develop competition in the squads. This way, whether the limit on foreign players is four or five, it doesn't have a huge effect.
So how about stipulating that a player (except the nominated captain) can only play a maximum of 75% of the total matches in the league stage for his team? This would mean a cap of 12 games per player this season.
Full post
Play five foreign players to help Indian cricket

By Karan Mamgain, Indonesia

Nikita Bastian
Nikita Bastian
25-Feb-2013
By Karan Mamgain, Indonesia
It's 8pm in India. Time to grab a beer – or tea – and settle down to watch the tamasha unfold on TV on Set Max. You ask your buddy, ‘wasn't the game last night fun?’ He replies, ‘yes, they played so well, especially him’. If the IPL wants to continue selling itself, the ‘him’ in that sentence needs to be replaced with youngsters’ names. With nine teams playing 16 game apiece, it is a fair criticism that the IPL is too long, for the viewers and the players. A possible antidote would be if it threw up international quality youngsters on a regular basis. That would keep the players and audience better interested, but is that possible under the current format?
The solution, I think, is simple, and its effects will extend to the quality of cricket being played – another plus for the viewers. Allow each team to field five overseas players. It may sound counterintuitive: how does taking away an Indian's spot help India’s youngsters, those waiting to emerge from the anonymity of domestic cricket. Competition. That’s the answer.
Full post

Showing 11 - 20 of 21