Arjuna Ranatunga's statement to ICC code of conduct hearing (30 January 1999)
"During the One Day International Cricket match played between Sri Lanka and England at the Adelaide Oval on January 23, 1999, I took certain actions following the decision of umpire Emerson to no ball Sri Lankan off spinner Muttiah Muralitharan
30-Jan-1999
30 January 1999
Arjuna Ranatunga's statement to ICC code of conduct hearing
The Daily News
Arjuna Ranatunga the Sri Lankan skipper who was found guilty
of breaching the IC Code of Conduct and was slapped a six one-day
match suspended for 12 months and fined 75 per cent of his match fee
issued the following statement:
"During the One Day International Cricket match played between Sri
Lanka and England at the Adelaide Oval on January 23, 1999, I took
certain actions following the decision of umpire Emerson to no ball
Sri Lankan off spinner Muttiah Muralitharan under Law 24.2 of The laws
of Cricket. Like umpire Emerson's decision, my actions have been the
subject of an intense public debate which, unfortunately, has taken
the focus off the outstanding cricket that is being played by the
Australian, English and Sri Lankan teams.
In the interests of cricket, I have agreed to give this statement to
the ICC Code of Conduct Inquiry and have agreed to its release to the
public to explain my conduct and reiterate the important
responsibilities I have to cricket as captain of Sri Lanka. As captain
of the Sri Lankan team, I acknowledge and understand my responsibility
to uphold the spirit as well as the laws of the game.
Cricket is an emotional game which is of immense importance to the
peoples of many different nations. It is a game that tests the
character of those who play it, particularly at international level
where the happiness of millions can be affected by the outcome of a
particular match or the bating or bowling performance of an individual
player. The spirit of cricket invokes not only the wonderful
characteristic of sportsmanship, but also the virtues of teamwork and
loyalty to one's teammates and superiors. Some times these qualities
can find themselves in competition.
My actions following the no balling of Sri Lanka's great bowler Murali
during the match were motivated by my responsibility to demonstrate
support for Murali in this difficult situation. I believe Murali is a
player who possesses talent which should be the source of celebration
for cricket lovers the world over. I was not motivated to cause
embarrassment to anyone. However, I recognise that my actions during
the game did cause embarrassment to the opposition team, to members of
the public and to officials.
My actions in approaching the boundary line were simply consistent
with the instructions I had received from the BCCSL to consult with
them should Murali be no balled.
The implications of the decision of umpire Emerson were potentially
far reaching and beyond my authority as captain of the Sri Lankan
team, where my responsibilities are limited to the team's on field
performance. As captain, however, I wish to publicly state that I do
acknowledge that my responsibilities extend to upholding the spirit of
the beautiful game I play, as well as its laws.
It is my absolute commitment that I will be seen as upholding those
principles for so long as I have the privilege to play the game of
cricket at any level."
Source :: Daily News (https://www.lanka.net)