Matches (15)
IPL (4)
PSL (3)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Stats Analysis

Kapil Dev's 175, and Duncan Fletcher's all-round show

A look at the best batting, bowling, allround, and team performances of the 1983 World Cup

Kapil Dev on his way to 175 off 138, India v Zimbabwe, 1983 World Cup, Tunbridge Wells, June 18, 1983

Kapil Dev's 175 was undoubtedly the innings of the 1983 World Cup  •  Getty Images

A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.

The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.

The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.

The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.

The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.

Let us move on to the Performance Analysis tables for 1983.

Top Batting performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Batsman For VsRuns Balls
1 7381983 216N Kapil Dev India Zim175*138
2 3491983 197MD Crowe New Zealand Eng 97 118
3 3481983 210IVA Richards West Indies Ind119 146
4 3391983 201DI Gower England Slk130 120
5 3361983 200Yashpal Sharma India Win 89 120
6 3291983 218Zaheer Abbas Pakistan Nzl103*121
7 3171983 197AJ Lamb England Nzl102 105
8 3121983 207TM Chappell Australia Ind110 131
9 3121983 222IVA Richards West Indies Pak 80* 96
10 2981983 211Imran Khan Pakistan Slk102*133

This Kapil Dev innings is the lily which need not be gilded. So much has been written about it. Kapil came in at 9 for 4, saw the score slide to 17 for 5, and scored an unbeaten 175 to take India to 266 for 8 and on to a 31 run win. And a week later to the World Cup win. This was one of the greatest ODI innings of all time. Martin Crowe's brave 97 follows next, a mile away, albeit in a losing cause. Richards' measured 119 against India follows next. He would dearly have liked to have transferred a few of these runs to the final. David Gower's smooth-as-silk innings contained five sixes, not so common those days. Yashpal Sharma's innings was an important match-winner against West Indies.

Top Bowling performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Bowler For VsAnalysis
1 4831983 207KH MacLeay India Aus11.5 - 3 - 39 - 6
2 4721983 214ALF de Mel New Zealand Slk12.0 - 4 - 32 - 5
3 4581983 223S Madan Lal West Indies Ind12.0 - 2 - 31 - 3
4 4191983 206RJ Hadlee Sri Lanka Nzl10.1 - 4 - 25 - 5
5 4101983 203WW Davis Australia Win10.3 - 0 - 51 - 7
6 3911983 211ALF de Mel Pakistan Slk12.0 - 1 - 39 - 5
7 3671983 223M Amarnath West Indies Ind 7.0 - 0 - 12 - 3
8 3621983 199DAG Fletcher Australia Zim11.0 - 1 - 42 - 4
9 3601983 211Abdul Qadir Sri Lanka Pak12.0 - 1 - 44 - 5
10 3441983 202Abdul Qadir New Zealand Pak12.0 - 4 - 21 - 4

Unlikely in the next two World Cups, there were a number of five-wicket bowling efforts during 1983. The bowling table is headed by MacLeay's six-wicket haul against India. It was a very average batting performance by the Indians. This is followed by de Mel's 5 for 32 against New Zealand. This match was won by Sri Lanka: an upset of sorts in those days. Then comes possibly the most important 3-wicket bowling effort by any bowler: Madan Lal's 3 for 31 against West Indies in the final. He dismissed Haynes, Richards and Gomes. Amarnath's cleaning up act of 3 for 12 in the final comes later in the table. Winston Davis' seven-wicket haul, the first in ODI history, is in the top five.

Top Player performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Player For Vs Runs Balls Analysis
1 6231983 199DAG Fletcher Zimbabwe Aus 69* 8411.0-1-42-4
2 5621983 223S Madan Lal India Win 17 2712.0-2-31-3
3 4881983 202Abdul Qadir Pakistan Nzl 41* 6812.0-4-21-4
4 4851983 223M Amarnath India Win 26 80 7.0-0-12-3
5 4431983 207N Kapil Dev India Aus 40 2712.0-2-43-5
6 4421983 216KM Curran Zimbabwe Ind 73 9312.0-1-65-3
7 4361983 218Zaheer Abbas Pakistan Nzl103*121 4.0-1- 8-1
8 4221983 221M Amarnath India Eng 46 9212.0-1-27-2
9 3471983 209JV Coney New Zealand Eng 66* 9712.0-2-27-1
10 2931983 209RJ Hadlee New Zealand Eng 31 4510.0-3-32-3

One of the greatest WC upsets was Zimbabwe's defeat of Australia in 1983. One player led the effort from the front: their captain, Duncan Fletcher, unfortunately much-maligned by Indian fans nowadays. His quick 69 took Zimbabwe to a middling total of 239. Then he captured 4 top order Australian wickets to secure an unlikely 13-run win. Madan Lal's useful 17 at no.9, coupled with his 3-wicket haul in the final got him to a second place. Amarnath, with his similar valuable cameo and 3-wicket haul, is in fifth place. Kapil Dev, with his economical spell supplementing the great innings of 175 is in the top half of the table.

Top Team performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Team Own score Vs Other score
1 8181983 223India 183 for 10 in 54.4Win140 for 10 in 52.0
2 7201983 221India 217 for 4 in 54.4Eng213 for 10 in 60.0
3 7111983 222West Indies 188 for 2 in 48.4Pak184 for 8 in 60.0
4 6921983 207Australia 320 for 9 in 60.0Ind158 for 10 in 37.5
5 6881983 217England 137 for 1 in 24.1Slk136 for 10 in 50.4
6 6741983 199Zimbabwe 239 for 6 in 60.0Aus226 for 7 in 60.0
7 6601983 219India 247 for 10 in 55.5Aus129 for 10 in 38.2
8 6501983 197England 322 for 6 in 60.0Nzl216 for 10 in 59.0
9 6421983 205England 199 for 2 in 50.4Pak193 for 8 in 60.0
10 6411983 214Sri Lanka 184 for 7 in 52.5Nzl181 for 10 in 58.2

India's surprisingly easy final win propelled them to the top of the Team standings. The fact that the margin was 43 runs with a low first innings score of 183 helped them a lot. The quality of the West Indian team was an added factor. India's easy 6-wicket win over England in the semi final is in second place. England was also a strong team. The other semi final provides the third place. Pakistan was vanquished by West Indies. Zimbabwe's upset win over Australia is in sixth place.

This was the World Cup in which the tortoise moved past the winning post after the self destruction of the hare. There was a bit of arrogance in the West Indian batting. Richards had the match in his hands and if he had batted for another 30 minutes West Indies would have won. There was a portent to this in the league win by India over West Indies. But there is no denying that this was a much loved Indian team and each player contributed his bit. The last man, Sandhu scored 11 and bowled the ball of the match castling Greenidge with a devastating in-swinger. India's semi final win over England was unexpected and comprehensive.

The match of the tournament, other than the final, was Zimbabwe's upset win over Australia.
The partnership of the tournament was Imran Khan's stand of 144 for the sixth wicket, with Shahid Mahboob.
The innings of the tournament: this could very well be called the innings of the ten World Cups, the 175 by Kapil Dev.
The bowling spell was probably Fletcher's 4 top order Australian wickets.

Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems